Jonathan Penm

Dr. Jonathan Penm

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 May 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJonathan Minh Phuong
Jonathan Minh Phuong
JPJonathan Penm
Jonathan Penm
BCBetty Chaar
Betty Chaar
LOLachlan Daniel Oldfield
Lachlan Daniel Oldfield
RMRebekah Moles
Rebekah Moles
In recent years, medication shortages have become a growing worldwide issue. This scoping review aimed to systematically synthesise the literature to report on the economic, clinical, and humanistic impacts of medication shortages on patient outcomes. Medline, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched using the two key concepts of medicine shortage and patient outcomes. Articles were limited to the English language, human studies and there were no limits to the year of publication. Manuscripts included contained information regarding the shortage of a scheduled medication and had gathered data regarding the economic, clinical, and/or humanistic outcomes of drug shortages on human patients. We found that drug shortages were predominantly reported to have adverse economic, clinical and humanistic outcomes to patients. Patients were more commonly reported to have increased out of pocket costs, rates of drug errors, adverse events, mortality, and complaints during times of shortage. There were also reports of equivalent and improved patient outcomes in some cases. The results of this review provide valuable insights into the impact drug shortages have on patient outcomes. The majority of studies reported medication shortages resulted in negative patient clinical, economic and humanistic outcomes.

1 February 2021 in Journal of Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGShruti Goradia
Shruti Goradia
ASArwa Abu Sardaneh
Arwa Abu Sardaneh
SNSujita Narayan
Sujita Narayan
JPJonathan Penm
Jonathan Penm
APAsad Patanwala
Asad Patanwala

4 January 2018 in Human Resources for Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSThiago R. Santos
Thiago R. Santos
JPJonathan Penm
Jonathan Penm
André Oliveira BaldoniAndré Oliveira Baldoni
André Oliveira Baldoni
LALorena Rocha Ayres
Lorena Rocha Ayres
RMRebekah Moles
Rebekah Moles
CSCristina Sancehs
Cristina Sancehs
This study aims to describe the distribution of the hospital pharmacy workforce in Brazil. Data were acquired, during 2016, through the Brazilian National Database of Healthcare Facilities (CNES). The following variables were extracted: hospital name, registry number, telephone, e-mail, state, type of institution, subtype, management nature, ownership, presence of research/teaching activities, complexity level, number of hospital beds, presence of pharmacists, number of pharmacists, pharmacist specialization. All statistical analyses were performed by IBM SPSS v.19. The number of hospitals with a complete registry in the national database was 4790. The majority were general hospitals (77.9%), managed by municipalities (66.1%), under public administration (44.0%), had no research/teaching activities (90.5%), classified as medium complexity (71.6%), and had no pharmacist in their team (50.6%). Furthermore, almost 60.0% of hospitals did not comply with the minimum recommendations of having a pharmacist per 50 hospital beds. The Southeast region had the highest prevalence of pharmacists, with 64.4% of hospitals having a pharmaceutical professional. This may have occurred as this region had the highest population to hospital ratio. Non-profit hospitals were more likely to have pharmacists compared to those under public administration and private hospitals. This study mapped the hospital pharmacy workforce in Brazil, showing a higher prevalence of hospital pharmacists in the Southeast region, and in non-profit specialized hospitals.

30 August 2013 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GKGritta Kamarudin
Gritta Kamarudin
JPJonathan Penm
Jonathan Penm
Betty ChaarBetty Chaar
Betty Chaar
RMRebekah Moles
Rebekah Moles
Objective: To review the literature on educational interventions to improve prescribing and identify educational methods that improve prescribing competency in both medical and non-medical prescribers. Design: A systematic review was conducted. The databases Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), EMBASE and CINAHL were searched for articles in English published between January 1990 and July 2013. Setting: Primary and secondary care. Participants: Medical and non-medical prescribers. Intervention: Education-based interventions to aid improvement in prescribing competency. Primary outcome: Improvements in prescribing competency (knows how) or performance (shows how) as defined by Miller's competency model. This was primarily demonstrated through prescribing examinations, changes in prescribing habits or adherence to guidelines. Results: A total of 47 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Studies were categorised by their method of assessment, with 20 studies assessing prescribing competence and 27 assessing prescribing performance. A wide variety of educational interventions were employed, with different outcome measures and methods of assessments. In particular, six studies demonstrated that specific prescribing training using the WHO Guide to Good Prescribing increased prescribing competency in a wide variety of settings. Continuing medical education in the form of academic detailing and personalised prescriber feedback also yielded positive results. Only four studies evaluated educational interventions targeted at non-medical prescribers, highlighting that further research is needed in this area. Conclusions: A broad range of educational interventions have been conducted to improve prescribing competency. The WHO Guide to Good Prescribing has the largest body of evidence to support its use and is a promising model for the design of targeted prescribing courses. There is a need for further development and evaluation of educational methods for non-medical prescribers.

1 July 2018 in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EWErin L. Winstanley
Erin L. Winstanley
YZYifan Zhang
Yifan Zhang
RMRebecca Mashni
Rebecca Mashni
SSSydney Schnee
Sydney Schnee
JPJonathan Penm
Jonathan Penm
Neil MacKinnonNeil MacKinnon
Neil MacKinnon

1 March 2017 in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJonathan Penm
Jonathan Penm
Neil MacKinnonNeil MacKinnon
Neil MacKinnon
JBJill M. Boone
Jill M. Boone
ACAntonio Ciaccia
Antonio Ciaccia
CMCameron McNamee
Cameron McNamee
EWErin L. Winstanley
Erin L. Winstanley
To describe the strategies and policies implemented in Ohio to improve opioid safety and to discuss the role that pharmacists can play in implementing, promoting, and enhancing the effectiveness of these policies. Ohio has the fifth highest rate of drug overdose deaths (24.6 deaths per 100,000) in the United States. Unintentional drug overdose has become the leading cause of injury-related death in Ohio. In 2015, there were 3050 overdose deaths in Ohio, and in 2014 there were an estimated 12,847 overdose events reversed by emergency medical services with naloxone. Not applicable. In 2011, the Governor's Cabinet Opiate Action Team was created to implement a multifaceted strategy, in part (1) to promote the responsible use of opioids, (2) to reduce the supply of opioids, and (3) to support overdose prevention and expand access to naloxone. Innovations to assist these goals include the development of Ohio guidelines on the responsible use of opioids, mandatory use of Ohio's prescription drug monitoring program, closing pill mills, promotion of drug take-back programs and increased access to naloxone and public health campaigns. Not applicable. Since the development of the Governor's Cabinet Opiate Action Team, there were 81 million fewer doses of opioids dispensed to Ohio patients in 2015 compared with 782 million doses dispensed in 2011. As such, the proportion of unintentional drug overdose deaths involving prescription opioids has reduced from 45% in 2011 to 22% in 2015. Strong political support was crucial in Ohio to facilitate the rapid implementation opioid overdose prevention programs and the promotion of public awareness campaigns. However, the misuse and abuse of prescription opioids are complex problems requiring a comprehensive and multifaceted approach. Pharmacists are identified as a crucial component of the state strategy to addressing opioid abuse by promoting responsible prescribing and adopting prevention practices.