Pascal Title

Dr. Pascal Title

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 May 2014 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DRDaniel Rabosky
Daniel Rabosky
MGMichael Grundler
Michael Grundler
CACarlos Anderson
Carlos Anderson
PTPascal Title
Pascal Title
JSJeff J Shi
Jeff J Shi
JLJoanna G Larson
Joanna G Larson

4 July 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DRDaniel Rabosky
Daniel Rabosky
JCJonathan Chang
Jonathan Chang
PTPascal Title
Pascal Title
PCPeter Cowman
Peter Cowman
LSLauren Sallan
Lauren Sallan
MAMichael E. Alfaro
Michael E. Alfaro


1 June 2014 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KBKevin J. Burns
Kevin J. Burns
ASAllison J. Shultz
Allison J. Shultz
PTPascal Title
Pascal Title
NMNicholas A. Mason
Nicholas A. Mason
FBF. Keith Barker
F. Keith Barker
ILIrby J. Lovette
Irby J. Lovette

21 January 2019 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PTPascal Title
Pascal Title
DRDaniel L. Rabosky
Daniel L. Rabosky
Species‐specific diversification rates, or ‘tip rates’, can be computed quickly from phylogenies and are widely used to study diversification rate variation in relation to geography, ecology and phenotypes. These tip rates provide a number of theoretical and practical advantages, such as the relaxation of assumptions of rate homogeneity in trait‐dependent diversification studies. However, there is substantial confusion in the literature regarding whether these metrics estimate speciation or net diversification rates. Additionally, no study has yet compared the relative performance and accuracy of tip rate metrics across simulated diversification scenarios. We compared the statistical performance of three model‐free rate metrics (inverse terminal branch lengths; node density metric; DR statistic) and a model‐based approach (Bayesian analysis of macroevolutionary mixtures [BAMM]). We applied each method to a large set of simulated phylogenies that had been generated under different diversification processes. We summarized performance in relation to the type of rate variation, the magnitude of rate heterogeneity and rate regime size. We also compared the ability of the metrics to estimate both speciation and net diversification rates. We show decisively that model‐free tip rate metrics provide a better estimate of the rate of speciation than of net diversification. Error in net diversification rate estimates increases as a function of the relative extinction rate. In contrast, error in speciation rate estimates is low and relatively insensitive to extinction. Overall, and in particular when relative extinction was high, BAMM inferred the most accurate tip rates and exhibited lower error than non‐model‐based approaches. DR was highly correlated with true speciation rates but exhibited high error variance, and was the best metric for very small rate regimes. We found that, of the metrics tested, DR and BAMM are the most useful metrics for studying speciation rate dynamics and trait‐dependent diversification. Although BAMM was more accurate than DR overall, the two approaches have complementary strengths. Because tip rate metrics are more reliable estimators of speciation rate, we recommend that empirical studies using these metrics exercise caution when drawing biological interpretations in any situation where the distinction between speciation and net diversification is important.

5 May 2016 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ARAlison Davis Rabosky
Alison Davis Rabosky
CCChristian L. Cox
Christian L. Cox
DRDaniel L. Rabosky
Daniel L. Rabosky
PTPascal Title
Pascal Title
IHIris A. Holmes
Iris A. Holmes
JMJimmy A. McGuire
Jimmy A. McGuire
Batesian mimicry, in which harmless species (mimics) deter predators by deceitfully imitating the warning signals of noxious species (models), generates striking cases of phenotypic convergence that are classic examples of evolution by natural selection. However, mimicry of venomous coral snakes has remained controversial because of unresolved conflict between the predictions of mimicry theory and empirical patterns in the distribution and abundance of snakes. Here we integrate distributional, phenotypic and phylogenetic data across all New World snake species to demonstrate that shifts to mimetic coloration in nonvenomous snakes are highly correlated with coral snakes in both space and time, providing overwhelming support for Batesian mimicry. We also find that bidirectional transitions between mimetic and cryptic coloration are unexpectedly frequent over both long- and short-time scales, challenging traditional views of mimicry as a stable evolutionary ‘end point’ and suggesting that insect and snake mimicry may have different evolutionary dynamics.