Maryse Vanderplanck

Dr. Maryse Vanderplanck

University of Mons (UMONS)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 February 2020 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Anthony VaudoAnthony Vaudo
Anthony Vaudo
JTJohn F. Tooker
John F. Tooker
HPHarland M. Patch
Harland M. Patch
DBDavid Biddinger
David Biddinger
MCMichael Coccia
Michael Coccia
CGChristina M. Grozinger
Christina M. Grozinger
Pollinator nutritional ecology provides insights into plant–pollinator interactions, coevolution, and the restoration of declining pollinator populations. Bees obtain their protein and lipid nutrient intake from pollen, which is essential for larval growth and development as well as adult health and reproduction. Our previous research revealed that pollen protein to lipid ratios (P:L) shape bumble bee foraging preferences among pollen host-plant species, and these preferred ratios link to bumble bee colony health and fitness. Yet, we are still in the early stages of integrating data on P:L ratios across plant and bee species. Here, using a standard laboratory protocol, we present over 80 plant species’ protein and lipid concentrations and P:L values, and we evaluate the P:L ratios of pollen collected by three bee species. We discuss the general phylogenetic, phenotypic, behavioral, and ecological trends observed in these P:L ratios that may drive plant–pollinator interactions; we also present future research questions to further strengthen the field of pollination nutritional ecology. This dataset provides a foundation for researchers studying the nutritional drivers of plant–pollinator interactions as well as for stakeholders developing planting schemes to best support pollinators.

21 January 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maryse VanderplanckMaryse Vanderplanck
Maryse Vanderplanck
RMRomain Moerman
Romain Moerman
PRPierre Rasmont
Pierre Rasmont
GLGeorges Lognay
Georges Lognay
BWBernard Wathelet
Bernard Wathelet
DMDenis Michez
Denis Michez
Larvae and imagos of bees rely exclusively on floral rewards as a food source but host-plant range can vary greatly among bee species. While oligolectic species forage on pollen from a single family of host plants, polylectic bees, such as bumblebees, collect pollen from many families of plants. These polylectic species contend with interspecific variability in essential nutrients of their host-plants but we have only a limited understanding of the way in which chemicals and chemical combinations influence bee development and feeding behaviour. In this paper, we investigated five different pollen diets (Calluna vulgaris, Cistus sp., Cytisus scoparius, Salix caprea and Sorbus aucuparia) to determine how their chemical content affected bumblebee colony development and pollen/syrup collection. Three compounds were used to characterise pollen content: polypeptides, amino acids and sterols. Several parameters were used to determine the impact of diet on micro-colonies: (i) Number and weight of larvae (total and mean weight of larvae), (ii) weight of pollen collected, (iii) pollen efficacy (total weight of larvae divided by weight of the pollen collected) and (iv) syrup collection. Our results show that pollen collection is similar regardless of chemical variation in pollen diet while syrup collection is variable. Micro-colonies fed on S. aucuparia and C. scoparius pollen produced larger larvae (i.e. better mates and winter survivors) and fed less on nectar compared to the other diets. Pollen from both of these species contains 24-methylenecholesterol and high concentrations of polypeptides/total amino acids. This pollen nutritional “theme” seems therefore to promote worker reproduction in B. terrestris micro-colonies and could be linked to high fitness for queenright colonies. As workers are able to selectively forage on pollen of high chemical quality, plants may be evolutionarily selected for their pollen content, which might attract and increase the degree of fidelity of generalist pollinators, such as bumblebees.

6 August 2014 in Apidologie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLaurent Somme
Laurent Somme
Maryse VanderplanckMaryse Vanderplanck
Maryse Vanderplanck
DMDenis Michez
Denis Michez
ILIsabelle Lombaerde
Isabelle Lombaerde
RMRomain Moerman
Romain Moerman
AJAnne-Laure Jacquemart
Anne-Laure Jacquemart

18 April 2016 in Urban Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLaurent Somme
Laurent Somme
LMLaura Moquet
Laura Moquet
MQMuriel Quinet
Muriel Quinet
Maryse VanderplanckMaryse Vanderplanck
Maryse Vanderplanck
DMDenis Michez
Denis Michez
AJAnne-Laure Jacquemart
Anne-Laure Jacquemart

11 October 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maxence GérardMaxence Gérard
Maxence Gérard
DMDenis Michez
Denis Michez
VDVincent Debat
Vincent Debat
LFLovina Fullgrabe
Lovina Fullgrabe
IMIvan Meeus
Ivan Meeus
Maryse VanderplanckMaryse Vanderplanck
Maryse Vanderplanck
Human activities can generate a wide variety of direct and indirect effects on animals, which can manifest as environmental and genetic stressors. Several phenotypic markers have been proposed as indicators of these stressful conditions but have displayed contrasting results, depending, among others, on the phenotypic trait measured. Knowing the worldwide decline of multiple bumblebee species, it is important to understand these stressors and link them with the drivers of decline. We assessed the impact of several stressors (i.e. natural toxin-, parasite-, thermic- and inbreeding- stress) on both wing shape and size and their variability as well as their directional and fluctuating asymmetries. The total data set includes 650 individuals ofBombus terrestris(Hymenoptera: Apidae). Overall wing size and shape were affected by all the tested stressors. Except for the sinigrin (e.g. glucosinolate) stress, each stress implies a decrease of wing size. Size variance was affected by several stressors, contrary to shape variance that was affected by none of them. Although wing size directional and fluctuating asymmetries were significantly affected by sinigrin, parasites and high temperatures, neither directional nor fluctuating shape asymmetry was significantly affected by any tested stressor. Parasites and high temperatures led to the strongest phenotype modifications. Overall size and shape were the most sensitive morphological traits, which contrasts with the common view that fluctuating asymmetry is the major phenotypic marker of stress.

1 January 2017 in Journal of Insect Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NRNathalie Roger
Nathalie Roger
DMDenis Michez
Denis Michez
RWRuddy Wattiez
Ruddy Wattiez
CSChristopher Sheridan
Christopher Sheridan
Maryse VanderplanckMaryse Vanderplanck
Maryse Vanderplanck