Tineke L Lenstra

Dr. Tineke L Lenstra

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2014 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Patrick KemmerenPatrick Kemmeren
Patrick Kemmeren
KSKatrin Sameith
Katrin Sameith
LPLoes A.L. van de Pasch
Loes A.L. van de Pasch
JBJoris J. Benschop
Joris J. Benschop
TLTineke L Lenstra
Tineke L Lenstra
FHFrank C.P. Holstege
Frank C.P. Holstege

1 May 2011 in Molecular Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TLTineke L Lenstra
Tineke L Lenstra
JBJoris J. Benschop
Joris J. Benschop
TKTaeSoo Kim
TaeSoo Kim
JSJulia M Schulze-Hentrich
Julia M Schulze-Hentrich
NBNathalie A.C.H. Brabers
Nathalie A.C.H. Brabers
FHFrank C.P. Holstege
Frank C.P. Holstege

17 May 2019 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BDBenjamin T Donovan
Benjamin T Donovan
AHAnh Huynh
Anh Huynh
DBDavid A Ball
David A Ball
HPHeta P Patel
Heta P Patel
MPMichael G Poirier
Michael G Poirier
TLTineke L Lenstra
Tineke L Lenstra
EMBO Press is an editorially independent publishing platform for the development of EMBO scientific publications.

5 July 2016 in Annual Review of Biophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TLTineke L Lenstra
Tineke L Lenstra
JRJoseph Rodriguez
Joseph Rodriguez
HCHuimin Chen
Huimin Chen
DLDaniel R. Larson
Daniel R. Larson
The transcription cycle can be roughly divided into three stages: initiation, elongation, and termination. Understanding the molecular events that regulate all these stages requires a dynamic view of the underlying processes. The development of techniques to visualize and quantify transcription in single living cells has been essential in revealing the transcription kinetics. They have revealed that (a) transcription is heterogeneous between cells and (b) transcription can be discontinuous within a cell. In this review, we discuss the progress in our quantitative understanding of transcription dynamics in living cells, focusing on all parts of the transcription cycle. We present the techniques allowing for single-cell transcription measurements, review evidence from different organisms, and discuss how these experiments have broadened our mechanistic understanding of transcription regulation.

1 December 2010 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWSake van Wageningen
Sake van Wageningen
Patrick KemmerenPatrick Kemmeren
Patrick Kemmeren
PLPhilip Lijnzaad
Philip Lijnzaad
TMThanasis Margaritis
Thanasis Margaritis
JBJoris J. Benschop
Joris J. Benschop
FHFrank C.P. Holstege
Frank C.P. Holstege

1 June 2014 in Molecular Systems Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EOEoghan O'DUibhir
Eoghan O'DUibhir
PLPhilip Lijnzaad
Philip Lijnzaad
JBJoris J Benschop
Joris J Benschop
TLTineke L Lenstra
Tineke L Lenstra
DLDik van Leenen
Dik van Leenen
FHFrank Cp Holstege
Frank Cp Holstege
Growth condition perturbation or gene function disruption are commonly used strategies to study cellular systems. Although it is widely appreciated that such experiments may involve indirect effects, these frequently remain uncharacterized. Here, analysis of functionally unrelated Saccharyomyces cerevisiae deletion strains reveals a common gene expression signature. One property shared by these strains is slower growth, with increased presence of the signature in more slowly growing strains. The slow growth signature is highly similar to the environmental stress response (ESR), an expression response common to diverse environmental perturbations. Both environmental and genetic perturbations result in growth rate changes. These are accompanied by a change in the distribution of cells over different cell cycle phases. Rather than representing a direct expression response in single cells, both the slow growth signature and ESR mainly reflect a redistribution of cells over different cell cycle phases, primarily characterized by an increase in the G1 population. The findings have implications for any study of perturbation that is accompanied by growth rate changes. Strategies to counter these effects are presented and discussed.