Sebastien Rinaldetti

Dr. Sebastien Rinaldetti

Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 February 2015 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LKL Kalmanti
L Kalmanti
SSS Saussele
S Saussele
MLM Lauseker
M Lauseker
MMM C Müller
M C Müller
CDC T Dietz
C T Dietz
RHR Hehlmann
R Hehlmann

7 May 2020 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRüdiger Hehlmann
Rüdiger Hehlmann
AVAstghik Voskanyan
Astghik Voskanyan
MLMichael Lauseker
Michael Lauseker
MPMarkus Pfirrmann
Markus Pfirrmann
LKLida Kalmanti
Lida Kalmanti
MBMichele Baccarani
Michele Baccarani
Blast crisis is one of the remaining challenges in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Whether additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) enable an earlier recognition of imminent blastic proliferation and a timelier change of treatment is unknown. One thousand five hundred and ten imatinib-treated patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML randomized in CML-study IV were analyzed for ACA/Ph+ and blast increase. By impact on survival, ACAs were grouped into high risk (+8, +Ph, i(17q), +17, +19, +21, 3q26.2, 11q23, −7/7q abnormalities; complex) and low risk (all other). The presence of high- and low-risk ACAs was linked to six cohorts with different blast levels (1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%) in a Cox model. One hundred and twenty-three patients displayed ACA/Ph+ (8.1%), 91 were high risk. At low blast levels (1–15%), high-risk ACA showed an increased hazard to die compared to no ACA (ratios: 3.65 in blood; 6.12 in marrow) in contrast to low-risk ACA. No effect was observed at blast levels of 20–30%. Sixty-three patients with high-risk ACA (69%) died (n = 37) or were alive after progression or progression-related transplantation (n = 26). High-risk ACA at low blast counts identify end-phase CML earlier than current diagnostic systems. Mortality was lower with earlier treatment. Cytogenetic monitoring is indicated when signs of progression surface or response to therapy is unsatisfactory.

18 September 2015 in Annals of Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAlice Fabarius
Alice Fabarius
LKLida Kalmanti
Lida Kalmanti
CDChristian T. Dietz
Christian T. Dietz
MLMichael Lauseker
Michael Lauseker
Sebastien RinaldettiSebastien Rinaldetti
Sebastien Rinaldetti
TGthe German CML Study Group
the German CML Study Group

13 September 2021 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NANeeraj Agarwal
Neeraj Agarwal
Sebastien RinaldettiSebastien Rinaldetti
Sebastien Rinaldetti
BCBassem B. Cheikh
Bassem B. Cheikh
QZQiong Zhou
Qiong Zhou
EHEvan P. Hass
Evan P. Hass
DTDan Theodorescu
Dan Theodorescu
Significance: Telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is involved in immortalization and survival of cancer cells. Recurring mutations in its promoter often lead to its reexpression in cancer. Therapies targeting hTERT activity have been challenging to develop, and none are in routine use. Using targeted functional genomics knockout screening in a human bladder cancer model, we found that transcription factor TRIM28 activates hTERT expression preferentially from the mutant promoter allele. We also revealed a therapeutically targetable mechanism whereby mTORC1-mediated phosphorylation of TRIM28 is required to activate hTERT transcription. This study describes an approach to functional screening of endogenous promoters and insights into TERT regulation, and it may aid clinicians in making informed decisions for precision therapy of cancer patients harboring hTERT promoter mutations.

26 February 2018 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSusanne Saussele
Susanne Saussele
RHRüdiger Hehlmann
Rüdiger Hehlmann
AFAlice Fabarius
Alice Fabarius
SJSabine Jeromin
Sabine Jeromin
UPUlrike Proetel
Ulrike Proetel
MLMichael Lauseker
Michael Lauseker
Major molecular remission (MMR) is an important therapy goal in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). So far, MMR is not a failure criterion according to ELN management recommendation leading to uncertainties when to change therapy in CML patients not reaching MMR after 12 months. At monthly landmarks, for different molecular remission status Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for patients registered to CML study IV who were divided in a learning and a validation sample. The minimum HR for MMR was found at 2.5 years with 0.28 (compared to patients without remission). In the validation sample, a significant advantage for progression-free survival (PFS) for patients in MMR could be detected (p-value 0.007). The optimal time to predict PFS in patients with MMR could be validated in an independent sample at 2.5 years. With our model we provide a suggestion when to define lack of MMR as therapy failure and thus treatment change should be considered. The optimal response time for 1% BCR-ABL at about 12–15 months was confirmed and for deep molecular remission no specific time point was detected. Nevertheless, it was demonstrated that the earlier the MMR is achieved the higher is the chance to attain deep molecular response later.

4 June 2020 in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JAJosh Abbott
Josh Abbott
QZQiong Zhou
Qiong Zhou
HEHector Esquer
Hector Esquer
LPLaura Pike
Laura Pike
TBTravis P. Broneske
Travis P. Broneske
DLDaniel V. Labarbera
Daniel V. Labarbera
Since the discovery of CHD1L in 2008, it has emerged as an oncogene implicated in the pathology and poor prognosis of a variety of cancers, including gastrointestinal cancers. However, a mechanistic understanding of CHD1L as a driver of colorectal cancer has been limited. Until now, there have been no reported inhibitors of CHD1L, also limiting its development as a molecular target. We sought to characterize the clinicopathologic link between CHD1L and colorectal cancer, determine the mechanism(s) by which CHD1L drives malignant colorectal cancer, and discover the first inhibitors with potential for novel treatments for colorectal cancer. The clinicopathologic characteristics associated with CHD1L expression were evaluated using microarray data from 585 patients with colorectal cancer. Further analysis of microarray data indicated that CHD1L may function through the Wnt/TCF pathway. Thus, we conducted knockdown and overexpression studies with CHD1L to determine its role in Wnt/TCF-driven epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). We performed high-throughput screening (HTS) to identify the first CHD1L inhibitors. The mechanism of action, antitumor efficacy, and drug-like properties of lead CHD1L inhibitors were determined using biochemical assays, cell models, tumor organoids, patient-derived tumor organoids, and in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Lead CHD1L inhibitors display potent in vitro antitumor activity by reversing TCF-driven EMT. The best lead CHD1L inhibitor possesses drug-like properties in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic mouse models. This work validates CHD1L as a druggable target and establishes a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of colorectal cancer.