Accurately predicting the mortality of trees that initially survive a fire event is important for management, such as planning post-fire salvage, planting, and prescribed fires. Although crown scorch has been successfully used to predict post-fire mortality (greater than one-year post-fire), it remains unclear whether other first-order fire effect metrics (e.g., stem char) and information on growing conditions can improve such predictions. Droughts can also elevate mortality and may interact, synergistically, with fire effects to influence post-fire tree survival. We used logistic regression to test whether drought exposure, as indicated by summarized monthly Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) over ten-years could improve predictions of delayed mortality (4–9 years post-fire) at the individual tree level in fire-affected forest inventory and analysis (FIA) plots in California (USA). We included crown scorch, bark thickness, stem char, soil char, slope, and aspect in the model as predictors. We selected the six most prevalent species to include in the model: canyon live oak, Douglas-fir, Jeffrey pine, incense-cedar, ponderosa pine, and white fir. Mean delayed mortality, based on tree count, across all FIA plots across all tree species and plots was 17%, and overall accuracy was good (AUC = 79%). Our model performed well, correctly predicting survivor trees (sensitivity of 0.98) but had difficulty correctly predicting the smaller number of mortality trees (specificity of 0.27) at the standard probability=0.5 mortality threshold. Crown scorch was the most influential predictor of tree mortality. Increasing crown scorch was associated with greater risk of delayed mortality for all six species, with trees exhibiting over 75% crown scorch having a probability of dying that exceeded 0.5. Increasing levels of stem char and soil char (first order indicators) were associated with increasing mortality risk but to less effect than crown scorch. We expected that greater drought exposure would increase delayed post-fire mortality, but we found that increasing drought exposure (median and minimum PDSI) was associated with a modest decrease in post-fire mortality. However, we did find that trees with high levels of crown scorch were less likely to survive with increasing drought exposure (median PDSI). Delayed mortality risk decreased as terrain slope increased. Taken together, our results suggest that trees with substantial crown damage may be more vulnerable to delayed mortality if exposed to drought and that crown scorch is an effective post-fire mortality predictor up to 10 years post-fire.

Forest land managers rely on predictions of tree mortality generated from fire behavior models to identify stands for post-fire salvage and to design fuel reduction treatments that reduce mortality. A key challenge in improving the accuracy of these predictions is selecting appropriate wind and fuel moisture inputs. Our objective was to evaluate postfire mortality predictions using the Forest Vegetation Simulator Fire and Fuels Extension (FVS-FFE) to determine if using representative fire-weather data would improve prediction accuracy over two default weather scenarios. We used pre- and post-fire measurements from 342 stands on forest inventory plots, representing a wide range of vegetation types affected by wildfire in California, Oregon, and Washington. Our representative weather scenarios were created by using data from local weather stations for the time each stand was believed to have burned. The accuracy of predicted mortality (percent basal area) with different weather scenarios was evaluated for all stands, by forest type group, and by major tree species using mean error, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE). One of the representative weather scenarios, Mean Wind, had the lowest mean error (4%) in predicted mortality, but performed poorly in some forest types, which contributed to a relatively high RMSE of 48% across all stands. Driven in large part by over-prediction of modelled flame length on steeper slopes, the greatest over-prediction mortality errors arose in the scenarios with higher winds and lower fuel moisture. Our results also indicated that fuel moisture was a stronger influence on post-fire mortality than wind speed. Our results suggest that using representative weather can improve accuracy of mortality predictions when attempting to model over a wide range of forest types. Focusing simulations exclusively on extreme conditions, especially with regard to wind speed, may lead to over-prediction of tree mortality from fire.