Ciro Gardi

Dr. Ciro Gardi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2005 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VPVittorio Parisi
Vittorio Parisi
Cristina MentaCristina Menta
Cristina Menta
CGCiro Gardi
Ciro Gardi
CJCarlo Jacomini
Carlo Jacomini
EMEnrico Mozzanica
Enrico Mozzanica

17 April 2014 in Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CGCiro Gardi
Ciro Gardi
PPPanos Panagos
Panos Panagos
MLMarc Van Liedekerke
Marc Van Liedekerke
CBClaudio Bosco
Claudio Bosco
DBDelphine De Brogniez
Delphine De Brogniez
Soil is a multifunctional, non-renewable natural resource for Europe as clearly expressed in the European Union (EU) Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection (COM (2006)231). Soil carries out multiple functions, including the support of food production. Urban development and its associated land take poses a major threat to soil and could have significant effects on agricultural production. This paper aims to evaluate the potential productivity losses in European agriculture due to land-take processes between 1990 and 2006. Agricultural land take was calculated using CORINE Land Cover maps of 1990, 2000 and 2006. For 21 of the 27 EU member states, agricultural land take was computed to be 752,973 ha for 1990–2000 and 436,095 ha for 2000–2006, representing 70.8% and 53.5%, respectively, of the total EU land take for these periods. The impact of this land take on the production capabilities of the agricultural sector for the period 1990–2006 for 19 of the 21 states was estimated to be equivalent to a loss of more than six million tonnes of wheat. The paper demonstrates that Europe’s intense urbanisation has a direct impact on its capability to produce food.JRC.H.7-Climate Risk Managemen

1 January 2016 in Applied Soil Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMichiel Rutgers
Michiel Rutgers
AOAlberto Orgiazzi
Alberto Orgiazzi
CGCiro Gardi
Ciro Gardi
JRJörg Römbke
Jörg Römbke
SJStephan Jänsch
Stephan Jänsch
DZDick de Zwart
Dick de Zwart

5 February 2013 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CGCiro Gardi
Ciro Gardi
SJSimon Jeffery
Simon Jeffery
ASAndrea Saltelli
Andrea Saltelli

15 September 2009 in European Journal of Soil Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CGCiro Gardi
Ciro Gardi
LML. Montanarella
L. Montanarella
DAD. Arrouays
D. Arrouays
ABA. Bispo
A. Bispo
PLP. Lemanceau
P. Lemanceau
Cristina MentaCristina Menta
Cristina Menta

1 March 2016 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AOAlberto Orgiazzi
Alberto Orgiazzi
PPPanos Panagos
Panos Panagos
YYYusuf Yigini
Yusuf Yigini
MDMartha B. Dunbar
Martha B. Dunbar
CGCiro Gardi
Ciro Gardi
CBCristiano Ballabio
Cristiano Ballabio
Because of the increasing pressures exerted on soil, below-ground life is under threat. Knowledge-based rankings of potential threats to different components of soil biodiversity were developed in order to assess the spatial distribution of threats on a European scale. A list of 13 potential threats to soil biodiversity was proposed to experts with different backgrounds in order to assess the potential for three major components of soil biodiversity: soil microorganisms, fauna, and biological functions. This approach allowed us to obtain knowledge-based rankings of threats. These classifications formed the basis for the development of indices through an additive aggregation model that, along with ad-hoc proxies for each pressure, allowed us to preliminarily assess the spatial patterns of potential threats. Intensive exploitation was identified as the highest pressure. In contrast, the use of genetically modified organisms in agriculture was considered as the threat with least potential. The potential impact of climate change showed the highest uncertainty. Fourteen out of the 27 considered countries have more than 40% of their soils with moderate-high to high potential risk for all three components of soil biodiversity. Arable soils are the most exposed to pressures. Soils within the boreal biogeographic region showed the lowest risk potential. The majority of soils at risk are outside the boundaries of protected areas. First maps of risks to three components of soil biodiversity based on the current scientific knowledge were developed. Despite the intrinsic limits of knowledge-based assessments, a remarkable potential risk to soil biodiversity was observed. Guidelines to preliminarily identify and circumscribe soils potentially at risk are provided. This approach may be used in future research to assess threat at both local and global scale and identify areas of possible risk and, subsequently, design appropriate strategies for monitoring and protection of soil biota.