Rashmita Bajracharya

Ms. Rashmita Bajracharya


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
SDSeema Das
Seema Das
Rupesh DasRupesh Das
Rupesh Das
RBRashmita Bajracharya
Rashmita Bajracharya
GBGehanath Baral
Gehanath Baral
BJBina Jabegu
Bina Jabegu
MOMaria Lisa Odland
Maria Lisa Odland
This study aims to determine the incidence of pre-eclampsia and distribution of risk factors of pre-eclampsia at Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. A retrospective study included 4820 pregnant women from 17 September to 18 December 2017. Data were obtained from the medical records of the hospital’s Statistics Department. Associations between the risk factors and pre-eclampsia were determined using logistic regression analysis and expressed as odds ratios. The incidence rate of pre-eclampsia in the study population was 1.8%. Higher incidence of pre-eclampsia was observed for women older than 35 years (Adjusted Odds Ratio, AOR)= 3.27; (Confidence Interval, CI 1.42–7.52) in comparison to mothers aged 20–24 years, primiparous women (AOR = 2.12; CI 1.25–3.60), women with gestational age less than 37 weeks (AOR = 3.68; CI 2.23–6.09), twins pregnancy (AOR = 8.49; CI 2.92–24.72), chronic hypertension (AOR = 13.64; CI 4.45–41.81), urinary tract infection (AOR = 6.89; CI 1.28–36.95) and gestational diabetes (AOR = 11.79; CI 3.20–43.41). Iron and calcium supplementation appear to be protective. Age of the mothers, primiparity, early gestational age, twin pregnancy, chronic hypertension, urinary tract infection and gestational diabetes were the significant risk factors for pre-eclampsia. Iron and calcium supplementation and young aged women were somewhat protective.

25 May 2022 in Innovation in Aging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSShamatree Shakya
Shamatree Shakya
RBRashmita Bajracharya
Rashmita Bajracharya
LLLeila Ledbetter
Leila Ledbetter
MCMichael P Cary
Michael P Cary
Background and Objectives: Enhanced management and prevention of frailty depend on our understanding of the association between potentially modifiable risk factors and frailty. However, the associations between potentially modifiable cardiometabolic risk factors and frailty are not clear. The purpose of this review was to appraise and synthesize the current evidence examining the associations between the cardiometabolic risk factors and frailty. Research Design and Methods: Multiple databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase (via Elsevier), and Web of Science (via Clarivate), were searched extensively. Studies that examined cardiometabolic risk factors and frailty as main predictors and outcome of interest, respectively, among older adults (≥60 years) were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to evaluate the quality of studies. PRISMA (2020) guided this review, and findings were synthesized without meta-analysis. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021252565). Results: Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Abdominal obesity, hyperglycemia, and multiple co-occurring cardiometabolic risk factors were associated with the increased likelihood of frailty in older adults. There was inconsistency across the studies regarding the associations between dyslipidemia, elevated blood pressure, and frailty. Discussion and Implications: Understanding the association between cardiometabolic risk factors and frailty can have translational benefits in developing tailored interventions for the prevention and management of frailty. More studies are needed to validate predictive and clinically significant associations between single and specific combinations of co-occurring cardiometabolic risk factors and frailty.

12 April 2022 in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRashmita Bajracharya
Rashmita Bajracharya
JGJack M. Guralnik
Jack M. Guralnik
MSMichelle D. Shardell
Michelle D. Shardell
ARAlan M. Rathbun
Alan M. Rathbun
TYTakashi Yamashita
Takashi Yamashita
DODenise L. Orwig
Denise L. Orwig

3 February 2023 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRashmita Bajracharya
Rashmita Bajracharya
VKVerena Katzke
Verena Katzke
Trasias MukamaTrasias Mukama
Trasias Mukama
RKRudolf Kaaks
Rudolf Kaaks
Ecological studies showed correlations between a shift toward animal-protein-rich diets and longer life-expectancy; however, only a few studies examined individual-level association of protein source and mortality risks using appropriate iso-caloric substitution models adjusted for total energy intake. We used EPIC-Heidelberg (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition) to create iso-caloric substitution models and determined relative all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality hazards associated with dietary intake of animal protein and other macronutrients, employing Cox proportional hazard models. For comparison with other studies, we also synthesized evidence from a systematic review relating animal protein intake to mortality risk from seven prospective cohort studies in the USA, Europe and Japan. Substitution of 3% of total energy from animal protein for fat (saturated, mono-unsaturated) and carbohydrate (simple, complex) was associated with all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratios [HR] from 1.05 to 1.11), mostly driven by cardiovascular mortality (HR from 1.13 to 1.15). Independently of animal protein, substituting poly-unsaturated fat for saturated fat increased cancer-related mortality risk by 12 percent. The systematic review largely corroborated our findings. Overall, higher proportions of dietary energy from animal protein, combined with low energy intake from either carbohydrate sub-types or dietary fats, increases all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risks, but not cancer-related mortality.

11 August 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAEnrique Almanza-Aguilera
Enrique Almanza-Aguilera
DFDaniel Guiñón Fort
Daniel Guiñón Fort
APAurora Perez-Cornago
Aurora Perez-Cornago
Miriam Martínez-HuélamoMiriam Martínez-Huélamo
Miriam Martínez-Huélamo
CACristina Andrés-Lacueva
Cristina Andrés-Lacueva
Raul Zamora-RosRaul Zamora-Ros
Raul Zamora-Ros
Existing epidemiological evidence regarding the potential role of (poly)phenol intake in prostate cancer (PCa) risk is scarce and, in the case of flavonoids, it has been suggested that their intake may increase PCa risk. We investigated the associations between the intake of the total and individual classes and subclasses of (poly)phenols and the risk of PCa, including clinically relevant subtypes. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort included 131,425 adult men from seven European countries. (Poly)phenol intake at baseline was assessed by combining validated center/country-specific dietary questionnaires and the Phenol-Explorer database. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). In total, 6939 incident PCa cases (including 3501 low-grade and 710 high-grade, 2446 localized and 1268 advanced, and 914 fatal Pca cases) were identified during a mean follow-up of 14 years. No associations were observed between the total intake of (poly)phenols and the risk of PCa, either overall (HRlog2 = 0.99, 95% CI 0.94–1.04) or according to PCa subtype. Null associations were also found between all classes (phenolic acids, flavonoids, lignans, and stilbenes) and subclasses of (poly)phenol intake and the risk of PCa, overall and according to PCa subtype. The results of the current large prospective cohort study do not support any association between (poly)phenol intake and PCa incidence.

14 March 2023 in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRashmita Bajracharya
Rashmita Bajracharya
JGJack M. Guralnik
Jack M. Guralnik
MSMichelle D. Shardell
Michelle D. Shardell
MHMarc C. Hochberg
Marc C. Hochberg
DODenise L. Orwig
Denise L. Orwig
JMJay S. Magaziner
Jay S. Magaziner