Vipin Kumar Singh

Dr. Vipin Kumar Singh

Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India, 221005

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 June 2021 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vishnu D. RajputVishnu D. Rajput
Vishnu D. Rajput
Tatiana MinkinaTatiana Minkina
Tatiana Minkina
Arpna KumariArpna Kumari
Arpna Kumari
. Harish. Harish
. Harish
Vipin Kumar SinghVipin Kumar Singh
Vipin Kumar Singh
Chetan KeswaniChetan Keswani
Chetan Keswani
Abiotic stress in plants is a crucial issue worldwide, especially heavy-metal contaminants, salinity, and drought. These stresses may raise a lot of issues such as the generation of reactive oxygen species, membrane damage, loss of photosynthetic efficiency, etc. that could alter crop growth and developments by affecting biochemical, physiological, and molecular processes, causing a significant loss in productivity. To overcome the impact of these abiotic stressors, many strategies could be considered to support plant growth including the use of nanoparticles (NPs). However, the majority of studies have focused on understanding the toxicity of NPs on aquatic flora and fauna, and relatively less attention has been paid to the topic of the beneficial role of NPs in plants stress response, growth, and development. More scientific attention is required to understand the behavior of NPs on crops under these stress conditions. Therefore, the present work aims to comprehensively review the beneficial roles of NPs in plants under different abiotic stresses, especially heavy metals, salinity, and drought. This review provides deep insights about mechanisms of abiotic stress alleviation in plants under NP application.

1 April 2021 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UAUttpal Anand
Uttpal Anand
BRBhaskar Reddy
Bhaskar Reddy
Vipin Kumar SinghVipin Kumar Singh
Vipin Kumar Singh
ASAmit Kishore Singh
Amit Kishore Singh
Kavindra Kumar KesariKavindra Kumar Kesari
Kavindra Kumar Kesari
Jesus Simal-GandaraJesus Simal-Gandara
Jesus Simal-Gandara
The disposal of municipal solid waste (MSW) directly at landfills or open dump areas, without segregation and treatment, is a significant concern due to its hazardous contents of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB), antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), and metal resistance genes (MGEs). The released leachate from landfills greatly effects the soil physicochemical, biological, and groundwater properties associated with agricultural activity and human health. The abundance of ARB, ARGs, and MGEs have been reported worldwide, including MSW landfill sites, animal husbandry, wastewater, groundwater, soil, and aerosol. This review elucidates the occurrence and abundance of ARB, ARGs, and MRGs, which are regarded as emerging contaminants (ECs). Recently, ECs have received global attention because of their prevalence in leachate as a substantial threat to environmental and public health, including an economic burden for developing nations. The present review exclusively discusses the demands to develop a novel eco-friendly management strategy to combat these global issues. This review also gives an intrinsic discussion about the insights of different aspects of environmental and public health concerns caused due to massive leachate generation, the abundance of antibiotics resistance (AR), and the effects of released leachate on the various environmental reservoirs and human health. Furthermore, the current review throws light on the source and fate of different ECs of landfill leachate and their possible impact on the nearby environments (groundwater, surface water, and soil) affecting human health. The present review strongly suggests the demand for future research focuses on the advancement of the removal efficiency of contaminants with the improvement of relevant landfill management to reduce the potential effects of disposable waste. We propose the necessity of the identification and monitoring of potential environmental and human health risks associated with landfill leachate contaminants.

2 December 2022 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
UDUmesh Pravin Dhuldhaj
Umesh Pravin Dhuldhaj
RSRISHIKESH SINGH
RISHIKESH SINGH
Vipin Kumar SinghVipin Kumar Singh
Vipin Kumar Singh

28 June 2023 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NKNikhil Kashyap
Nikhil Kashyap
Sandeep Kumar SinghSandeep Kumar Singh
Sandeep Kumar Singh
NYNisha Yadav
Nisha Yadav
Vipin Kumar SinghVipin Kumar Singh
Vipin Kumar Singh
MKMadhuree Kumari
Madhuree Kumari
Ajay KumarAjay Kumar
Ajay Kumar
The considerable loss of crop productivity each year due to plant disease or pathogen invasion during pre- or post-harvest storage conditions is one of the most severe challenges to achieving the goals of food security for the rising global population. Although chemical pesticides severally affect the food quality and health of consumers, a large population relies on them for plant disease management. But currently, endophytes have been considered one of the most suitable biocontrol agents due to better colonization and acclimatization potential. However, a very limited number of endophytes have been used commercially as biocontrol agents. Isolation of endophytes and their screening to represent potential characteristics as biocontrol agents are considered challenging by different procedures. Through a web search using the keywords “endophytes as biocontrol agents” or “biocontrol mechanism of endophytes,” we have succinctly summarised the isolation strategies and different in vitro and in vivo biocontrol screening methods of endophytic biocontrol agents in the present review. In this paper, biocontrol mechanisms of endophytes and their potential application in plant disease management have also been discussed. Furthermore, the registration and regulatory mechanism of the endophytic biocontrol agents are also covered.

11 September 2018 in Environmental Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Vipin Kumar SinghVipin Kumar Singh
Vipin Kumar Singh
ASAsha Lata Singh
Asha Lata Singh
RSRishikesh Singh
Rishikesh Singh
AKAjay Kumar
Ajay Kumar

6 June 2018 in Applied Water Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAsha Lata Singh
Asha Lata Singh
Vipin Kumar SinghVipin Kumar Singh
Vipin Kumar Singh
A total of 22 water quality parameters were selected for the analysis of groundwater samples with reference to arsenic contamination. Samples were collected in the pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons of the year 2013. The maximum arsenic concentration in both the pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons was approximately the same, i.e., the maximum arsenic concentration being 75.60 and 74.46 µg/L in pre-monsoon and monsoon, respectively. Out of 72 collected samples, three were below the WHO guideline value of 10 µg/L for arsenic concentration. In 95.83% of the groundwater samples, the arsenic concentration was above the permissible limit. Nickel, manganese, and chromium concentrations were above the permissible limits in nearly all samples except for chromium concentration in a few pre-monsoon samples. However, the total iron concentrations in 23 samples (31.94%) were above the permissible limit. A total of six and seven principal components (PCs) were extracted using principal component analysis during the pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons, respectively, accounting for 76.25 and 78.52% of the total variation during two consecutive seasons. Correlation statistics revealed that the arsenic concentration was positively correlated with phosphate, iron, ammonium, bicarbonate, and manganese concentrations but negatively correlated with oxidation reduction potential (ORP), sulfate concentration, electrical conductivity, and total dissolved solids concentration. The negative correlation of arsenic with ORP suggested reducing conditions prevailing in the groundwater. The trilinear Piper diagram revealed calcium and magnesium enrichment of groundwater with an abundance of chloride ions but no predominance of bicarbonate ions. Thus, the groundwater fell into Ca2+ − Mg2+ − Cl− − SO42− category.