Tomas Erban

Dr. Tomas Erban

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 October 2016 in Microbial Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJan Hubert
Jan Hubert
MBMartina Bicianova
Martina Bicianova
Ondrej LedvinkaOndrej Ledvinka
Ondrej Ledvinka
MKMartin Kamler
Martin Kamler
PLPhilip J. Lester
Philip J. Lester
TETomas Erban
Tomas Erban

24 February 2016 in Experimental and Applied Acarology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMartin Kamler
Martin Kamler
MNMarta Nesvorna
Marta Nesvorna
JSJitka Stara
Jitka Stara
TETomas Erban
Tomas Erban
JHJan Hubert
Jan Hubert

21 March 2008 in Experimental and Applied Acarology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TETomas Erban
Tomas Erban
JHJan Hubert
Jan Hubert

11 July 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TETomas Erban
Tomas Erban
Ondrej LedvinkaOndrej Ledvinka
Ondrej Ledvinka
MKMartin Kamler
Martin Kamler
MNMarta Nesvorna
Marta Nesvorna
BHBronislava Hortova
Bronislava Hortova
JHJan Hubert
Jan Hubert
Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) workers act as passive vectors of Paenibacillus larvae spores, which cause the quarantine disease American foulbrood (AFB). We assessed the relative proportions of P. larvae within the honeybee microbiome using metabarcoding analysis of the 16 S rRNA gene. The microbiome was analyzed in workers outside of the AFB zone (control - AFB0), in workers from asymptomatic colonies in an AFB apiary (AFB1), and in workers from colonies exhibiting clinical AFB symptoms (AFB2). The microbiome was processed for the entire community and for a cut-off microbiome comprising pathogenic/environmental bacteria following the removal of core bacterial sequences; varroosis levels were considered in the statistical analysis. No correlation was observed between AFB status and varroosis level, but AFB influenced the worker bee bacterial community, primarily the pathogenic/environmental bacteria. There was no significant difference in the relative abundance of P. larvae between the AFB1 and AFB0 colonies, but we did observe a 9-fold increase in P. larvae abundance in AFB2 relative to the abundance in AFB1. The relative sequence numbers of Citrobacter freundii and Hafnia alvei were higher in AFB2 and AFB1 than in AFB0, whereas Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella oxytoca, Spiroplasma melliferum and Morganella morganii were more abundant in AFB0 and AFB1 than in AFB2.

17 April 2019 in Journal of Natural Products
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TETomas Erban
Tomas Erban
ESElena Shcherbachenko
Elena Shcherbachenko
PTPavel Talacko
Pavel Talacko
KHKarel Harant
Karel Harant

25 September 2017 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TETomas Erban
Tomas Erban
Ondrej LedvinkaOndrej Ledvinka
Ondrej Ledvinka
MKMartin Kamler
Martin Kamler
BHBronislava Hortova
Bronislava Hortova
MNMarta Nesvorna
Marta Nesvorna
JHJan Hubert
Jan Hubert
Background: Melissococcus plutoniusis an entomopathogenic bacterium that causes European foulbrood (EFB), a honeybee (Apis melliferaL.) disease that necessitates quarantine in some countries. In Czechia, positive evidence of EFB was absent for almost 40 years, until an outbreak in the Krkonose Mountains National Park in 2015. This occurrence of EFB gave us the opportunity to study the epizootiology of EFB by focusing on the microbiome of honeybee workers, which act as vectors of honeybee diseases within and between colonies.Methods: The study included worker bees collected from brood combs of colonies (i) with no signs of EFB (EFB0), (ii) without clinical symptoms but located at an apiary showing clinical signs of EFB (EFB1), and (iii) with clinical symptoms of EFB (EFB2). In total, 49 samples from 27 honeybee colonies were included in the dataset evaluated in this study. Each biological sample consisted of 10 surface-sterilized worker bees processed for DNA extraction. All subjects were analyzed using conventional PCR and by metabarcoding analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene V1–V3 region, as performed through Illumina MiSeq amplicon sequencing.Results: The bees from EFB2 colonies with clinical symptoms exhibited a 75-fold-higher incidence ofM. plutoniusthan those from EFB1 asymptomatic colonies.Melissococcus plutoniuswas identified in all EFB1 colonies as well as in some of the control colonies. The proportions ofFructobacillus fructosus,Lactobacillus kunkeei,Gilliamella apicola,Frischella perrara, andBifidobacterium coryneformewere higher in EFB2 than in EFB1, whereasLactobacillus melliswas significantly higher in EFB2 than in EFB0.Snodgrassella alviandL. melliventris,L. helsingborgensisand,L. kullabergensisexhibited higher proportion in EFB1 than in EFB2 and EFB0. The occurrence ofBartonella apisandCommensalibacter intestiniwere higher in EFB0 than in EFB2 and EFB1.Enterococcus faecalisincidence was highest in EFB2.Conclusions: High-throughput Illumina sequencing permitted a semi-quantitative analysis of the presence ofM. plutoniuswithin the honeybee worker microbiome. The results of this study indicate that worker bees from EFB-diseased colonies are capable of transmittingM. plutoniusdue to the greatly increased incidence of the pathogen. The presence ofM. plutoniussequences in control colonies supports the hypothesis that this pathogen exists in an enzootic state. The bacterial groups synergic to both the colonies with clinical signs of EFB and the EFB-asymptomatic colonies could be candidates for probiotics. This study confirms thatE. faecalisis a secondary invader toM. plutonius; however, other putative secondary invaders were not identified in this study.