The tumor-derived factors involved in the expansion and accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in metastatic dissemination of colorectal cancer (CRC) to the liver has not been studied. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) and signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) in human colorectal tumors. IL-6 and interferon-γ were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Tumor growth, invasion, and migration were evaluated by MTT, transwell, and wound healing assays, respectively. Subcutaneous tumor-bearing and CRC liver metastasis (CRLM) nude mouse models were constructed. The percentage of MDSCs was measured using multicolor flow cytometry. Western blot assay was used to evaluate S1PR1 and p-STAT3 expression in MDSCs after separation from the liver and tumor by magnetic antibody. T-cell suppression assay was detected by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE). Aberrant co-expressed S1PR1 and p-STAT3 was correlated with metachronous liver metastasis and poor prognosis in CRC. A mutual activation loop between S1PR1 and STAT3 can enhance CRC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and in vivo. The expression of p-STAT3 and its downstream proteins can be regulated by S1PR1. p-STAT3 was the dependent signaling pathway of S1PR1 in the promotion of cell growth and liver metastasis in CRC. The level of IL-6 and the associated MDSCs stimulated by the S1PR1–STAT3 correlated with the number of liver metastatic nodes in the CRLM mouse models and patients. Increased CD14⁺HLA-DR^−/low MDSCs from CRLM patients inhibited autologous T-cell proliferation and predict poor prognosis. The S1PR1–STAT3–IL-6–MDSCs axis operates in both tumor cells and MDSCs involved in the promotion of growth and liver metastasis in CRC. MDSCs induced by S1PR1–STAT3 in CRC cells formed the premetastatic niche in the liver can promote organ-specific metastasis.

Silencing homeobox C6 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation

Background: The calculation of the tumor burden score (TBS) is not perfect because the bilobar spread of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is neglected. The identification of an ideal prognostic scoring system for CRLM remains controversial. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent curative intent liver resection for CRLM from one medical center were enrolled in cohort 1 (787 patients) and cohort 2 (162 patients). Tumor relapse-free survival (RFS) was the main outcome. A Cox regression model was used to identify independent predictors of prognosis. The time-dependent area under the curve, calibration curve, and C-index were employed to validate the predictive ability of the survival model. Results: Modified TBS (mTBS) was established by a mathematical equation with parameters including CRLM size, CRLM number, and unilobar or bilobar metastasis. Five preoperative predictors of worse RFS were identified in cohort 1 and incorporated into the Comprehensive Evaluation of Relapse Risk (CERR) score: KRAS/NRAS/BRAF-mutated tumor (1 point); node-positive primary (1 point); extrahepatic disease (1 point); carcinoembryonic antigen level > 200 ng/mL or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) >200 U/mL (1 point); and mTBS between 5 and 11 (1 point) or 12 and over (2 points). Patients in cohort 1 were stratified by their CERR score into risk groups: the high-risk group (CERR score 4 or more), the medium-risk group (CERR score 2–3), and the low-risk group (CERR score 0–1). Importantly, internal validation in cohort 1 and further validation in cohort 2 both showed the superior discriminatory capacity of the CERR score. Conclusion: mTBS should be promoted. The CERR score is a powerful prognostic tool that can help determine optimal clinical management strategies. Implications for Practice: This work resulted in the successful modification of the tumor burden score and development of a comprehensive and practical prognostic scoring system—the Comprehensive Evaluation of Relapse Risk (CERR) score. The CERR score, with a better prognostic discriminatory ability, outperformed the Fong score. Perhaps more importantly, the CERR score is a powerful prognostic tool because it unified the most consistently reported prognostic factors. Therefore, the CERR score can assist doctors in determining optimal clinical management strategies.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between robotic-assisted simultaneous resection and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer and liver metastases. Background: Open simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases is widely performed and the potential cure for eligible patients. However, the feasibility of robotic simultaneous resection of primary and secondary liver lesions has not been established as a treatment option for metastatic rectal cancer. Patients and methods: A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted at a hospital in China. Enrolling patients were aged from 18 to 75 years and diagnosed with surgically resectable metastatic rectal cancer (distal extension to ≤15 cm from the anal margin). Patients selected for simultaneous resection were randomly assigned to have robotic or open surgery at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of complications within 30 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints were bladder, sexual function, 3-year disease-free survival, and overall survival. Results: A total of 171 patients were enrolled in this trial with 86 in the robotic group and 85 in the open group. As a result, patients in the robotic group demonstrated fewer complications within 30 days after surgery than those in the open group (31.4 vs. 57.6%, P=0.014) and no mortality seen in either group. Patients in the robotic group had less blood loss [mean (SD), 125.5 (38.3) vs. 211.6 (68.7) ml; P<0.001], faster bowel function recovery [mean (SD), 63.7 (27.4) vs. 93.8 (33.5) h P<0.001] and shorter hospital stay [mean (SD), 8.0 (2.2) vs. 10.7 (5.4) days; P<0.001] compared with those in the open group. The robotic group had a faster recovery of bladder and sexual function at 3 months after surgery than that of the open group. The 3-year disease-free survival rate (39.5 vs. 35.3%, P=0.739) and the 3-year overall survival rate (76.7 vs. 72.9%, P=0.712) were not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusions: In our randomized clinical trial, robotic simultaneous resection treatment of patients with rectal cancer and liver metastases resulted in fewer surgical complications, and a faster recovery to those of open surgery. Oncological outcomes showed no significant difference between the two groups.

Currently, no published studies have compared the clinical outcomes of the medial-to-lateral approach (MA) and lateral-to-medial approach (LA) for open right hemicolectomy. Thus, the present study aimed to assess whether one of these approaches has any potential benefits over the other. A retrospective study was performed of all patients who underwent open right hemicolectomy with pathologically confirmed disease who met the eligibility criteria between June 2008 and June 2012. The population was divided into an MA group and an LA group by propensity scoring. We compared patient demographic and clinical characteristic variables between the two groups and assessed short-term and long-term outcomes. A total of 450 patients (MA, n = 150; LA, n = 300) were evaluated. The operation time (MA,138.4 minutesvs.LA,166.2 minutes; P < .05) and blood loss (MA,52.0mL vs. LA,62.6mL; P < .05)were significantly lower in the MA group. No differences in the number of harvested lymph nodes and oncologic outcomes were observed between the two groups. Further subgroup analysis for stage III colon cancer revealed that the MA group had significantly more retrieved lymph nodes (MA,18.8vs. LA,16.0; P = .028). There were no differences in other variables between the two groups. The MA reduced operative time and blood loss compared with the LA. We thus concluded that the MA provided short-term benefits compared with the LA in open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer.