SEMA ATASEVER

Mrs. SEMA ATASEVER

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 November 2022 in Clinical Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASEMA ATASEVER
SEMA ATASEVER
NANuh Azginoglu
Nuh Azginoglu
DTDuygu Sinanc Terzi
Duygu Sinanc Terzi
RTRamazan Terzi
Ramazan Terzi

20 February 2023 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGülbahar Bilgiç
Gülbahar Bilgiç
EBEmre Bendeş
Emre Bendeş
BÖBaşak Öztürk
Başak Öztürk
SASEMA ATASEVER
SEMA ATASEVER

13 March 2023 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGülbahar Bilgiç
Gülbahar Bilgiç
BOBasak Ozturk
Basak Ozturk
SASEMA ATASEVER
SEMA ATASEVER
MŞMükerrem Şahin
Mükerrem Şahin
HKHakan Kaplan
Hakan Kaplan

15 June 2024 in Medicinal Chemistry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SASEMA ATASEVER
SEMA ATASEVER

1 September 2023 in Biomimetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EKEbubekir Kaya
Ebubekir Kaya
CKCeren Baştemur Kaya
Ceren Baştemur Kaya
EBEmre Bendeş
Emre Bendeş
SASEMA ATASEVER
SEMA ATASEVER
BOBasak Ozturk
Basak Ozturk
BYBilgin Yazlık
Bilgin Yazlık
One of the most used artificial intelligence techniques for maximum power point tracking is artificial neural networks. In order to achieve successful results in maximum power point tracking, the training process of artificial neural networks is important. Metaheuristic algorithms are used extensively in the literature for neural network training. An important group of metaheuristic algorithms is swarm-intelligent-based optimization algorithms. In this study, feed-forward neural network training is carried out for maximum power point tracking by using 13 swarm-intelligent-based optimization algorithms. These algorithms are artificial bee colony, butterfly optimization, cuckoo search, chicken swarm optimization, dragonfly algorithm, firefly algorithm, grasshopper optimization algorithm, krill herd algorithm, particle swarm optimization, salp swarm algorithm, selfish herd optimizer, tunicate swarm algorithm, and tuna swarm optimization. Mean squared error is used as the error metric, and the performances of the algorithms in different network structures are evaluated. Considering the results, a success ranking score is obtained for each algorithm. The three most successful algorithms in both training and testing processes are the firefly algorithm, selfish herd optimizer, and grasshopper optimization algorithm, respectively. The training error values obtained with these algorithms are 4.5 × 10−4, 1.6 × 10−3, and 2.3 × 10−3, respectively. The test error values are 4.6 × 10−4, 1.6 × 10−3, and 2.4 × 10−3, respectively. With these algorithms, effective results have been achieved in a low number of evaluations. In addition to these three algorithms, other algorithms have also achieved mostly acceptable results. This shows that the related algorithms are generally successful ANFIS training algorithms for maximum power point tracking.

21 September 2022 in Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASEMA ATASEVER
SEMA ATASEVER
BOBasak Ozturk
Basak Ozturk
GBGülbahar Bilgiç
Gülbahar Bilgiç
With the increasing integration of wind power systems into conventional power systems, an accurate wind speed (WS) forecasting technique is essential for the reliable and stable operation of the power grid. The availability of wind energy increases with the correct WS estimation technique. Linear statistical methods such as the Seasonal Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) model have been popular in recent times for short-term and very short-term forecasting of WS. However, studies are continuing the effect of forecast errors resulting from different disaggregated time series on the resulting WS forecast error. In this paper, we present a state-of-the-art machine learning model, the Prophet model, which has not been used in short-term wind forecasting before in the literature. The performance reliability and accuracy of the developed Prophet model’s results were compared to those of the SARIMA model. The success of forecasting time-series data was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Square Error (RMSE) results. The models’ reliability, accuracy, fit, and performance were evaluated using standardized residuals, autocorrelation function (ACF), and partial autocorrelation (PACF). The 7-day performance metrics of the Prophet model are 1.9, 2.5, 4.1, 3.8, 4.0, 8.4, and 2.1 for MAE, and 2.3, 2.9, 4.7, 5.0, 4.4, 8.6, and 2.5 for RMSE, respectively. The performance measures of the SARIMA model are 3.3, 4.1, 5.1, 4.8, 5.1, 1.8, and 5.4 for the MAE, and 4.2, 5.1, 6.2, 6.2, 5.7, 2.6, and 6.2 for the RMSE, respectively. The Prophet model gave higher accuracy than SARIMA for all other days except 1 day (06.01.2018). As a result, the Prophet model outperformed the SARIMA model in predicting WS measurements 24 h ahead using quarterly training data.