Sarah Marshall-Pescini

Dr. Sarah Marshall-Pescini


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 August 2009 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AWAndrew Whiten
Andrew Whiten
NMNicola McGuigan
Nicola McGuigan
SMSarah Marshall-Pescini
Sarah Marshall-Pescini
LHLydia M. Hopper
Lydia M. Hopper
We describe our recent studies of imitation and cultural transmission in chimpanzees and children, which question late twentieth-century characterizations of children as imitators, but chimpanzees as emulators. As emulation entails learning only about the results of others' actions, it has been thought to curtail any capacity to sustain cultures. Recent chimpanzee diffusion experiments have by contrast documented a significant capacity for copying local behavioural traditions. Additionally, in recent ‘ghost’ experiments with no model visible, chimpanzees failed to replicate the object movements on which emulation is supposed to focus. We conclude that chimpanzees rely more on imitation and have greater cultural capacities than previously acknowledged. However, we also find that they selectively apply a range of social learning processes that include emulation. Recent studies demonstrating surprisingly unselective ‘over-imitation’ in children suggest that children's propensity to imitate has been underestimated too. We discuss the implications of these developments for the nature of social learning and culture in the two species. Finally, our new experiments directly address cumulative cultural learning. Initial results demonstrate a relative conservatism and conformity in chimpanzees' learning, contrasting with cumulative cultural learning in young children. This difference may contribute much to the contrast in these species' capacities for cultural evolution.

1 February 2004 in Learning & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AWAndrew Whiten
Andrew Whiten
VHVictoria Horner
Victoria Horner
CLCarla Litchfield
Carla Litchfield
SMSarah Marshall-Pescini
Sarah Marshall-Pescini

1 July 2009 in Behavioural Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSarah Marshall-Pescini
Sarah Marshall-Pescini
CPChiara Passalacqua
Chiara Passalacqua
SBShanis Barnard
Shanis Barnard
PVPaola Maria Valsecchi
Paola Maria Valsecchi
EPEmanuela Prato-Previde
Emanuela Prato-Previde

1 July 2008 in Behavioural Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSarah Marshall-Pescini
Sarah Marshall-Pescini
PVPaola Maria Valsecchi
Paola Maria Valsecchi
IPIrena Petak
Irena Petak
PAPier Attilio Accorsi
Pier Attilio Accorsi
EPEmanuela Prato Previde
Emanuela Prato Previde

11 October 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IMIsabella Merola
Isabella Merola
EPEmanuela Prato-Previde
Emanuela Prato-Previde
SMSarah Marshall-Pescini
Sarah Marshall-Pescini
Social referencing is a process whereby an individual uses the emotional information provided by an informant about a novel object/stimulus to guide his/her own future behaviour towards it. In this study adult dogs were tested in a social referencing paradigm involving a potentially scary object with either their owner or a stranger acting as the informant and delivering either a positive or negative emotional message. The aim was to evaluate the influence of the informant's identity on the dogs' referential looking behaviour and behavioural regulation when the message was delivered using only vocal and facial emotional expressions. Results show that most dogs looked referentially at the informant, regardless of his/her identity. Furthermore, when the owner acted as the informant dogs that received a positive emotional message changed their behaviour, looking at him/her more often and spending more time approaching the object and close to it; conversely, dogs that were given a negative message took longer to approach the object and to interact with it. Fewer differences in the dog's behaviour emerged when the informant was the stranger, suggesting that the dog-informant relationship may influence the dog's behavioural regulation. Results are discussed in relation to studies on human-dog communication, attachment, mood modification and joint attention.

1 November 2011 in Animal Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPChiara Passalacqua
Chiara Passalacqua
SMSarah Marshall-Pescini
Sarah Marshall-Pescini
SBShanis Barnard
Shanis Barnard
GLGabriella Lakatos
Gabriella Lakatos
PVPaola Maria Valsecchi
Paola Maria Valsecchi
EPEmanuela Prato Previde
Emanuela Prato Previde