Aria Olumi

Aria Olumi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 August 2004 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SFSan Francisco
San Francisco
IFIgnacio F.
Ignacio F.
WDWilliam C. DeWolf
William C. DeWolf
DPDonna M. Peehl
Donna M. Peehl
AOAria Olumi
Aria Olumi

1 December 2018 in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MIMatthew D. Ingham
Matthew D. Ingham
RLRichard J. Lee
Richard J. Lee
DMDhara MacDermed
Dhara MacDermed
AOAria Olumi
Aria Olumi

17 January 2022 in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKenneth Softness
Kenneth Softness
SKSumedh Kaul
Sumedh Kaul
AFAaron Fleishman
Aaron Fleishman
JEJason Efstathiou
Jason Efstathiou
JBJoaquim Bellmunt
Joaquim Bellmunt
BGBoris Gershman
Boris Gershman

1 January 2003
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IFIgnacio F San Francisco
Ignacio F San Francisco
WDWilliam C DeWolf
William C DeWolf
SRSeymour Rosen
Seymour Rosen
MUMelissa Upton
Melissa Upton
AOAria Olumi
Aria Olumi
We examined the concordance of Gleason scores in prostate needle biopsy specimens and the corresponding radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens in a cohort of patients grouped according to the number of cores obtained during diagnostic needle biopsy. We reviewed clinical and pathological data on a cohort of 466 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer by needle biopsies who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between January 1, 1990 and July 31, 2001. Two study groups were identified, including 126 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer by extended needle biopsies (10 or more cores) and 340 diagnosed with cancer by nonextended needle biopsies (9 or fewer cores). Mean age was 60 years and median prostate specific antigen was 5.8 ng./ml. The median number of cores in the extended and nonextended biopsy groups was 12 and 6, respectively. The concordance of Gleason score in the needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens was compared and correlated with the number of cores on needle biopsy. In the whole cohort 311 patients (67%) had identical Gleason scores on the needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens, while 53 (11%) were over graded and 102 (22%) were under graded on needle biopsy. In patients who underwent extended needle biopsies the accuracy rate for Gleason scoring was 76% with 10% over and 14% under graded. The highest accuracy rates were in patients with 13, 14 and 16 cores (89%, 87% and 100%, respectively). No patients in the extended needle biopsy group had a discrepancy of more than 2 Gleason units in grade in the biopsy and surgical specimens. In those who underwent nonextended needle biopsies the accuracy rate for Gleason scoring was 63% with 12% over and 25% under graded. There were significantly different rates of accuracy (p = 0.008) and under grading (p = 0.01) in the 2 needle biopsy groups. Patients with a needle biopsy Gleason score of less than 7 had significantly higher concordance with the prostatectomy Gleason score when extended biopsies were done compared with nonextended biopsies (p = 0.001). Prostate cancer grading by extended needle biopsy is a better predictor of the final Gleason score than nonextended needle biopsy, as determined by radical prostatectomy histological evaluation. Therefore, extended prostate needle biopsy provides better guidance to determine the appropriate treatment in patients with prostate cancer.

1 February 2014 in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Commentary on “Identification of 23 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci using the iCOGS custom genotyping array.” Eeles RA, Olama AA, Benlloch S, Saunders EJ, Leongamornlert DA, Tymrakiewicz M, Ghoussaini M, Luccarini C, Dennis J, Jugurnauth-Little S, Dadaev T, Neal DE, Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Muir K, Giles GG, Severi G, Wiklund F, Gronberg H, Haiman CA, Schumacher F, Henderson BE, Le Marchand L, Lindstrom S, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, Gapstur S, Chanock SJ, Berndt SI, Albanes D, Andriole G, Schleutker J, Weischer M, Canzian F, Riboli E, Key TJ, Travis RC, Campa D, Ingles SA, John EM, Hayes RB, Pharoah PD, Pashayan N, Khaw KT, Stanford JL, Ostrander EA, Signorello LB, Thibodeau SN, Schaid D, Maier C, Vogel W, Kibel AS, Cybulski C, Lubinski J, Cannon-Albright L, Brenner H, Park JY, Kaneva R, Batra J, Spurdle AB, Clements JA, Teixeira MR, Dicks E, Lee A, Dunning AM, Baynes C, Conroy D, Maranian MJ, Ahmed S, Govindasami K, Guy M, Wilkinson RA, Sawyer EJ, Morgan A, Dearnaley DP, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Khoo VS, Parker CC, Van As NJ, Woodhouse CJ, Thompson A, Dudderidge T, Ogden C, Cooper CS, Lophatananon A, Cox A, Southey MC, Hopper JL, English DR, Aly M, Adolfsson J, Xu J, Zheng SL, Yeager M, Kaaks R, Diver WR, Gaudet MM, Stern MC, Corral R, Joshi AD, Shahabi A, Wahlfors T, Tammela TL, Auvinen A, Virtamo J, Klarskov P, Nordestgaard BG, Røder MA, Nielsen SF, Bojesen SE, Siddiq A, Fitzgerald LM, Kolb S, Kwon EM, Karyadi DM, Blot WJ, Zheng W, Cai Q, McDonnell SK, Rinckleb AE, Drake B, Colditz G, Wokolorczyk D, Stephenson RA, Teerlink C, Muller H, Rothenbacher D, Sellers TA, Lin HY, Slavov C, Mitev V, Lose F, Srinivasan S, Maia S, Paulo P, Lange E, Cooney KA, Antoniou AC, Vincent D, Bacot F, Tessier DC; COGS–Cancer Research UK GWAS–ELLIPSE (part of GAME-ON) Initiative; Australian Prostate Cancer Bioresource; UK Genetic Prostate Cancer Study Collaborators/British Association of Urological Surgeons' Section of Oncology; UK ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) Study Collaborators; PRACTICAL (Prostate Cancer Association Group to Investigate Cancer-Associated Alterations in the Genome) Consortium, Kote-Jarai Z, Easton DF, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
AOAria Olumi
Aria Olumi

1 January 2003
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JUJean O Ung
Jean O Ung
IFIgnacio F San Francisco
Ignacio F San Francisco
MRMeredith M Regan
Meredith M Regan
WDWilliam C DeWolf
William C DeWolf
AOAria Olumi
Aria Olumi
We investigated the relationship between prostate volume and cancer detection by needle biopsy, and determined the effect of an increased number of cores on the sampling error of needle biopsy on large prostate glands. The study cohort included 750 consecutive patients who underwent first time transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy from January 1995 to August 2001. Prostate volumes were divided into quartiles (13 to 34, 34.1 to 45, 45.1 to 64 and 64.1 to 244 cc). Multivariate analysis controlling for age, prostate specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy indication was performed to determine the effect of the number of cores and prostate volume on prostate cancer detection. Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were older (p = 0.0035) and had higher PSA levels (p = 0.0002) than those with no cancer on biopsy. Decreasing cancer detection rates were seen with increasing prostate volume (p = 0.0074). The OR of detection for each additional core was 0.99 (95% CI 0.93, 1.06), suggesting that increasing the number of biopsy cores did not increase the rate of prostate cancer detection. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with larger prostates had the same, or possibly lower, cancer detection rate as the number of biopsy cores was increased. Patients with larger prostates were older (p <0.0001), had higher PSA levels (p <0.0001) and were even more likely to have undergone biopsy for increased PSA rather than abnormal digital rectal examination alone (p <0.0001). Our study suggests that the lower cancer detection rate for men with large prostates may be due to a decrease in the use of increased serum PSA for prostate cancer detection in larger prostates in addition to other factors such as sampling error. Increased serum PSA levels in cases of larger prostates, although a risk factor for prostate cancer warranting biopsy, may also be due to nonmalignant sources such as benign prostatic hyperplasia.