Laurent Vergnes

Dr. Laurent Vergnes


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2012 in Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKenichi Shimada
Kenichi Shimada
TCTimothy R. Crother
Timothy R. Crother
JKJustin Karlin
Justin Karlin
JDJargalsaikhan Dagvadorj
Jargalsaikhan Dagvadorj
NCNorika Chiba
Norika Chiba
MAMoshe Arditi
Moshe Arditi

14 May 2014 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RCRandall M. Chin
Randall M. Chin
XFXudong Fu
Xudong Fu
MPMelody Y. Pai
Melody Y. Pai
LVLaurent Vergnes
Laurent Vergnes
HHHeejun Hwang
Heejun Hwang
JHJing Huang
Jing Huang

7 April 2013 in Nature Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YKYoko Kidani
Yoko Kidani
HEHeidi Elsaesser
Heidi Elsaesser
MHM Benjamin Hock
M Benjamin Hock
LVLaurent Vergnes
Laurent Vergnes
KWKevin J Williams
Kevin J Williams
SBSteven J Bensinger
Steven J Bensinger
T cell division is an intense metabolic process, and meeting its demands requires extensive metabolic reprogramming of the cell. Bensinger and colleagues demonstrate that SREBPs are critical for this reprogramming. Newly activated CD8+ T cells reprogram their metabolism to meet the extraordinary biosynthetic demands of clonal expansion; however, the signals that mediate metabolic reprogramming remain poorly defined. Here we demonstrate an essential role for sterol regulatory element–binding proteins (SREBPs) in the acquisition of effector-cell metabolism. Without SREBP signaling, CD8+ T cells were unable to blast, which resulted in attenuated clonal expansion during viral infection. Mechanistic studies indicated that SREBPs were essential for meeting the heightened lipid requirements of membrane synthesis during blastogenesis. SREBPs were dispensable for homeostatic proliferation, which indicated a context-specific requirement for SREBPs in effector responses. Our studies provide insights into the molecular signals that underlie the metabolic reprogramming of CD8+ T cells during the transition from quiescence to activation.

7 September 2011 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EVErina Vlashi
Erina Vlashi
CLChann Lagadec
Chann Lagadec
LVLaurent Vergnes
Laurent Vergnes
TMTomoo Matsutani
Tomoo Matsutani
KMKenta Masui
Kenta Masui
FPFrank Pajonk
Frank Pajonk
Gliomas contain a small number of treatment-resistant glioma stem cells (GSCs), and it is thought that tumor regrowth originates from GSCs, thus rendering GSCs an attractive target for novel treatment approaches. Cancer cells rely more on glycolysis than on oxidative phosphorylation for glucose metabolism, a phenomenon used in 2-[ 18 F]fluoro-2-deoxy- d -glucose positron emission tomography imaging of solid cancers, and targeting metabolic pathways in cancer cells has become a topic of considerable interest. However, if GSCs are indeed important for tumor control, knowledge of the metabolic state of GSCs is needed. We hypothesized that the metabolism of GSCs differs from that of their progeny. Using a unique imaging system for GSCs, we assessed the oxygen consumption rate, extracellular acidification rate, intracellular ATP levels, glucose uptake, lactate production, PKM1 and PKM2 expression, radiation sensitivity, and cell cycle duration of GSCs and their progeny in a panel of glioma cell lines. We found GSCs and progenitor cells to be less glycolytic than differentiated glioma cells. GSCs consumed less glucose and produced less lactate while maintaining higher ATP levels than their differentiated progeny. Compared with differentiated cells, GSCs were radioresistant, and this correlated with a higher mitochondrial reserve capacity. Glioma cells expressed both isoforms of pyruvate kinase, and inhibition of either glycolysis or oxidative phosphorylation had minimal effect on energy production in GSCs and progenitor cells. We conclude that GSCs rely mainly on oxidative phosphorylation. However, if challenged, they can use additional metabolic pathways. Therefore, targeting glycolysis in glioma may spare GSCs.

1 December 2015 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AYAutumn G. York
Autumn G. York
KWKevin J. Williams
Kevin J. Williams
JAJoseph P. Argus
Joseph P. Argus
QZQuan D. Zhou
Quan D. Zhou
GBGurpreet Brar
Gurpreet Brar
SBSteven J. Bensinger
Steven J. Bensinger

15 November 2011 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJin Zhang
Jin Zhang
IKIvan Khvorostov
Ivan Khvorostov
JHJason S Hong
Jason S Hong
YOYavuz Oktay
Yavuz Oktay
LVLaurent Vergnes
Laurent Vergnes
MTMichael A Teitell
Michael A Teitell
It has been assumed, based largely on morphologic evidence, that human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) contain underdeveloped, bioenergetically inactive mitochondria. In contrast, differentiated cells harbour a branched mitochondrial network with oxidative phosphorylation as the main energy source. A role for mitochondria in hPSC bioenergetics and in cell differentiation therefore remains uncertain. Here, we show that hPSCs have functional respiratory complexes that are able to consume O2 at maximal capacity. Despite this, ATP generation in hPSCs is mainly by glycolysis and ATP is consumed by the F1F ATP synthase to partially maintain hPSC mitochondrial membrane potential and cell viability. Uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) plays a regulating role in hPSC energy metabolism by preventing mitochondrial glucose oxidation and facilitating glycolysis via a substrate shunting mechanism. With early differentiation, hPSC proliferation slows, energy metabolism decreases, and UCP2 is repressed, resulting in decreased glycolysis and maintained or increased mitochondrial glucose oxidation. Ectopic UCP2 expression perturbs this metabolic transition and impairs hPSC differentiation. Overall, hPSCs contain active mitochondria and require UCP2 repression for full differentiation potential. There is a [Have you seen?][1] (December 2011) associated with this Article. [1]: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.436