John Roberts

John Roberts

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2000 in Management Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPamela D. Morrison
Pamela D. Morrison
John RobertsJohn Roberts
John Roberts
EHEric von Hippel
Eric von Hippel
It is known that end users of products and services sometimes innovate, and that innovations developed by users sometimes become the basis for important newcommercial products and services. It has also been argued and to some extent shown that such innovations will be found concentrated in a “lead user” segment of the user community. However, neither the characteristics of innovating users nor the scope of the community that they “lead” has been explored in depth. In this paper, we explore the characteristics of innovation, innovators, and innovation sharing by library users of OPAC information search systems in Australia. This market has capable users, but it is nonetheless clearly a “follower” with respect to worldwide technological advance. Wefind that 26% of users in this local market nonetheless do modify their OPACs in both major and minor ways, and that OPAC manufacturers judge many of these user modifications to be of commercial interest. We find that we can distinguish modifying from nonmodifying users on the basis of a number of factors, including their “leading-edge status” and their in-house technical capabilities. We find that many innovating users freely share their innovations with others, and find that we can distinguish users that share information about their modifications from users that do not. We conclude by considering some implications of our findings for idea generation practices in marketing.

1 February 1991 in Games and Economic Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPaul Milgrom
Paul Milgrom
John RobertsJohn Roberts
John Roberts

1 March 2004 in Research Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PMPamela D Morrison
Pamela D Morrison
John RobertsJohn Roberts
John Roberts
DMDavid F Midgley
David F Midgley

1 June 2014 in International Journal of Research in Marketing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
John RobertsJohn Roberts
John Roberts
UKUjwal Kayande
Ujwal Kayande
SSStefan Stremersch
Stefan Stremersch
We aim to investigate the impact of marketing science articles and tools on the practice of marketing. This impact may be direct (e.g., an academic article may be adapted to solve a practical problem) or indirect (e.g., its contents may be incorporated into practitioners' tools, which then influence marketing decision making). We use the term “marketing science value chain” to describe these diffusion steps, and survey marketing managers, marketing science intermediaries (practicing marketing analysts), and marketing academics to calibrate the value chain.In our sample, we find that (1) the impact of marketing science is perceived to be largest on decisions such as the management of brands, pricing, new products, product portfolios, and customer/market selection, and (2) tools such as segmentation, survey-based choice models, marketing mix models, and pre-test market models have the largest impact on marketing decisions. Exemplary papers from 1982 to 2003 that achieved dual – academic and practice – impact are Guadagni and Little (1983) and Green and Srinivasan (1990). Overall, our results are encouraging. First, we find that the impact of marketing science has been largest on marketing decision areas that are important to practice. Second, we find moderate alignment between academic impact and practice impact. Third, we identify antecedents of practice impact among dual impact marketing science papers. Fourth, we discover more recent trends and initiatives in the period 2004–2012, such as the increased importance of big data and the rise of digital and mobile communication, using the marketing science value chain as an organizing framework

15 September 2008 in Journal of Marketing Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TATim Ambler
Tim Ambler
John RobertsJohn Roberts
John Roberts
This paper starts with the premise that marketing should be accountable, and considers by which measure or measures it should be held to account. "Marketing" for the purposes of this paper is defined as satisfying customers and thereby maximising net inward cash flow. This suggests that marketing performance can and should be evaluated financially, ideally with a single number, or "silver metric". The authors review the arguments for and against silver metrics in general and, in particular, three popular candidates: ROI, Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) and Return on Customer. So far as performance evaluation is concerned, six objections to the use of ROI, five to the use of DCF and four to Return on Customer are identified. Furthermore, the authors highlight the critical and potentially misleading role of forecasts as benchmarks for performance assessment. At the same time, the value of DCF techniques, such as customer equity and customer lifetime value, is recognis ed for planning purposes. A more satisfactor...

1 August 1999 in Marketing Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TETülin Erdem
Tülin Erdem
JSJoffre Swait
Joffre Swait
SBSusan Broniarczyk
Susan Broniarczyk
DCDipankar Chakravarti
Dipankar Chakravarti
JKJean-Noël Kapferer
Jean-Noël Kapferer
FZFlorian Zettelmeyer
Florian Zettelmeyer