Jorge Ropero

Dr. Jorge Ropero

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 July 2007 in IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IMIigo Monedero
Iigo Monedero
Carlos LeonCarlos Leon
Carlos Leon
JRJorge Ropero
Jorge Ropero
AGAntonio Garcia
Antonio Garcia
JEJos Manuel Elena
Jos Manuel Elena
JMJuan C. Montano
Juan C. Montano
Power-quality (PQ) monitoring is an essential service that many utilities perform for their industrial and larger commercial customers. Detecting and classifying the different electrical disturbances which can cause PQ problems is a difficult task that requires a high level of engineering knowledge. This paper presents a novel system based on neural networks for the classification of electrical disturbances in real time. In addition, an electrical pattern generator has been developed in order to generate common disturbances which can be found in the electrical grid. The classifier obtained excellent results (for both test patterns and field tests) thanks in part to the use of this generator as a training tool for the neural networks. The neural system is integrated on a software tool for a PC with hardware connected for signal acquisition. The tool makes it possible to monitor the acquired signal and the disturbances detected by the system.

2 July 2020 in JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJaime Benjumea
Jaime Benjumea
JRJorge Ropero
Jorge Ropero
Octavio RiveraOctavio Rivera
Octavio Rivera
EZEnrique Dorronzoro Zubiete
Enrique Dorronzoro Zubiete
Alejandro CarrascoAlejandro Carrasco
Alejandro Carrasco
Background: Privacy has always been a concern, especially in the health domain. The proliferation of mobile health (mHealth) apps has led to a large amount of sensitive data being generated. Some authors have performed privacy assessments of mHealth apps. They have evaluated diverse privacy components; however, different authors have used different criteria for their assessments. Objective: This scoping review aims to understand how privacy is assessed for mHealth apps, focusing on the components, scales, criteria, and scoring methods used. A simple taxonomy to categorize the privacy assessments of mHealth apps based on component evaluation is also proposed. Methods: We followed the methodology defined by Arksey and O’Malley to conduct a scoping review. Included studies were categorized based on the privacy component, which was assessed using the proposed taxonomy. Results: The database searches retrieved a total of 710 citations—24 of them met the defined selection criteria, and data were extracted from them. Even though the inclusion criteria considered articles published since 2009, all the studies that were ultimately included were published from 2014 onward. Although 12 papers out of 24 (50%) analyzed only privacy, 8 (33%) analyzed both privacy and security. Moreover, 4 papers (17%) analyzed full apps, with privacy being just part of the assessment. The evaluation criteria used by authors were heterogeneous and were based on their experience, the literature, and/or existing legal frameworks. Regarding the set of items used for the assessments, each article defined a different one. Items included app permissions, analysis of the destination, analysis of the content of communications, study of the privacy policy, use of remote storage, and existence of a password to access the app, among many others. Most of the included studies provided a scoring method that enables the comparison of privacy among apps. Conclusions: The privacy assessment of mHealth apps is a complex task, as the criteria used by different authors for their evaluations are very heterogeneous. Although some studies about privacy assessment have been conducted, a very large set of items to evaluate privacy has been used up until now. In-app information and privacy policies are primarily utilized by the scientific community to extract privacy information from mHealth apps. The creation of a scale based on more objective criteria is a desirable step forward for privacy assessment in the future.

16 September 2023 in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Octavio RiveraOctavio Rivera
Octavio Rivera
EGElia Gabarron
Elia Gabarron
JRJorge Ropero
Jorge Ropero
KDKerstin Denecke
Kerstin Denecke
Mobile health, or mHealth, is based on mobile information and communication technologies and provides solutions for empowering individuals to participate in healthcare. Personalisation techniques have been used to increase user engagement and adherence to interventions delivered as mHealth solutions. This study aims to explore the current state of personalisation in mHealth, including its current trends and implementation. We conducted a review following PRISMA guidelines. Four databases (PubMed, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, and APA PsycInfo) were searched for studies on mHealth solutions that integrate personalisation. The retrieved papers were assessed for eligibility and useful information regarding integrated personalisation techniques. Out of the 1,139 retrieved studies, 62 were included in the narrative synthesis. Research interest in the personalisation of mHealth solutions has increased since 2020. mHealth solutions were mainly applied to endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases; mental, behavioural, or neurodevelopmental diseases; or the promotion of healthy lifestyle behaviours. Its main purposes are to support disease self-management and promote healthy lifestyle behaviours. Mobile applications are the most prevalent technological solution. Although several design models, such as user-centred and patient-centred designs, were used, no specific frameworks or models for personalisation were followed. These solutions rely on behaviour change theories, use gamification or motivational messages, and personalise the content rather than functionality. A broad range of data is used for personalisation purposes. There is a lack of studies assessing the efficacy of these solutions; therefore, further evidence is needed. Personalisation in mHealth has not been well researched. Although several techniques have been integrated, the effects of using a combination of personalisation techniques remain unclear. Although personalisation is considered a persuasive strategy, many mHealth solutions do not employ it. Open research questions concern guidelines for successful personalisation techniques in mHealth, design frameworks, and comprehensive studies on the effects and interactions among multiple personalisation techniques.

28 July 2020 in JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJaime Benjumea
Jaime Benjumea
JRJorge Ropero
Jorge Ropero
Octavio RiveraOctavio Rivera
Octavio Rivera
EZEnrique Dorronzoro Zubiete
Enrique Dorronzoro Zubiete
Alejandro CarrascoAlejandro Carrasco
Alejandro Carrasco
Background: Cancer patients are increasingly using mobile health (mHealth) apps to take control of their health. Many studies have explored their efficiency, content, usability, and adherence; however, these apps have created a new set of privacy challenges, as they store personal and sensitive data. Objective: The purpose of this study was to refine and evaluate a scale based on the General Data Protection Regulation and assess the fairness of privacy policies of mHealth apps. Methods: Based on the experience gained from our previous work, we redefined some of the items and scores of our privacy scale. Using the new version of our scale, we conducted a case study in which we analyzed the privacy policies of cancer Android apps. A systematic search of cancer mobile apps was performed in the Spanish version of the Google Play website. Results: The redefinition of certain items reduced discrepancies between reviewers. Thus, use of the scale was made easier, not only for the reviewers but also for any other potential users of our scale. Assessment of the privacy policies revealed that 29% (9/31) of the apps included in the study did not have a privacy policy, 32% (10/31) had a score over 50 out of a maximum of 100 points, and 39% (12/31) scored fewer than 50 points. Conclusions: In this paper, we present a scale for the assessment of mHealth apps that is an improved version of our previous scale with adjusted scores. The results showed a lack of fairness in the mHealth app privacy policies that we examined, and the scale provides developers with a tool to evaluate their privacy policies.

8 October 2009 in Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJorge Ropero
Jorge Ropero
LBLauren Beach
Lauren Beach
MBManel Alcalà Bernàrdez
Manel Alcalà Bernàrdez
RRRaizza Rentas
Raizza Rentas
Rajesh N. DaveRajesh N. Dave
Rajesh N. Dave
RRRodolfo Jesus Romanach
Rodolfo Jesus Romanach

31 March 2012 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JRJorge Ropero
Jorge Ropero
AGAriel Gómez
Ariel Gómez
ACAlejandro Carrasco
Alejandro Carrasco
Carlos LeonCarlos Leon
Carlos Leon
In this paper, we propose a novel method for Information Extraction (IE) in a set of knowledge in order to answer to user consultations using natural language. The system is based on a Fuzzy Logic engine, which takes advantage of its flexibility for managing sets of accumulated knowledge. These sets may be built in hierarchic levels by a tree structure. The aim of this system is to design and implement an intelligent agent to manage any set of knowledge where information is abundant, vague or imprecise. The method was applied to the case of a major university web portal, University of Seville web portal, which contains a huge amount of information. Besides, we also propose a novel method for term weighting (TW). This method also is based on Fuzzy Logic, and replaces the classical TF–IDF method, usually used for TW, for its flexibility.