Guowei Li

Dr. Guowei Li


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 January 2017 in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGuowei Li
Guowei Li
LTLehana Thabane
Lehana Thabane
APAlexandra Papaioannou
Alexandra Papaioannou
GIGeorge Ioannidis
George Ioannidis
MLMitchell A. H. Levine
Mitchell A. H. Levine
JAJonathan Derrick Adachi
Jonathan Derrick Adachi
Osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures remain significant public health challenges worldwide. Recently the concept of frailty in relation to osteoporosis in the elderly has been increasingly accepted, with emerging studies measuring frailty as a predictor of osteoporotic fractures. In this overview, we reviewed the relationship between frailty and osteoporosis, described the approaches to measuring the grades of frailty, and presented current studies and future research directions investigating osteoporosis and frailty in the elderly. It is concluded that measuring the grades of frailty in the elderly could assist in the assessment, management and decision-making for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures at a clinical research level and at a health care policy level.

1 January 2018 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ATAnd Jie Tang
And Jie Tang
GLGuowei Li
Guowei Li
BCBaoxin Chen
Baoxin Chen
ZHZhijie Huang
Zhijie Huang
YZYanmei Zhang
Yanmei Zhang
YYYizhen Yu
Yizhen Yu
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a highly prevalent and serious public health problem among adolescents worldwide. However, to date there were no studies assessing the prevalence of NSSI defined by suggested DSM-5 criteria among Chinese adolescents. We aimed to conduct a nationwide survey to explore the prevalence of and risk factors for NSSI among school-based adolescents in rural China. A total sample of 15,623 adolescents in rural China were enrolled by using a multistage sampling method. Data was collected by self-report questionnaires including demographic characteristics, neglect, maltreatment, loneliness, resilience, social support and emotional management ability. NSSI was defined by suggested DSM-5 criteria, according to which the engagement in self-injury took place more than 5 times a year. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between risk factors and NSSI. There were 12.2% of adolescents (n = 1908) met the suggested DSM-5 criteria. Approximately 29% reported a history of NSSI at least once during the last year. Significant differences were found in several demographic factors including gender, ethnicity, grade, and family structure between adolescents with and without experiencing NSSI. The top three NSSI behaviors among adolescents with NSSI experience were hitting self, pinching, and pulling hair, with a prevalence rate of 16.7%, 14.1% and 11.2%, respectively. Female, Han ethnicity, fathers' education level, neglect, maltreatment, loneliness, social support, suicidal behaviors and emotional management ability were significantly associated with NSSI by multivariate analysis. No significant relationship was found between resilience and risk of NSSI. The DSM-5 has proposed 6 groups of criteria for NSSI, we only used criteria on frequency given its more accepted feasibility and pragmatic application. Consequently, it may different from other prevalence that estimated by other criteria. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting prevalence of NSSI defined by suggested DSM-5 criteria among adolescent in rural China. In comparison to finding from the similar samples of adolescents, Chinese rural adolescents seem to have a relative higher prevalence. The potential risk factors for NSSI include female, father's education, Han ethnicity, psychosocial factors and suicide behaviors. More evidence for further understanding of context of the occurrence, improving access to health care utilization, and identifying the role of psychosocial factors and family relationship, is needed for the prevention and management of NSSI.

28 January 2019 in Diabetes Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGuowei Li
Guowei Li
JPJerilynn C. Prior
Jerilynn C. Prior
WLWilliam D. Leslie
William D. Leslie
LTLehana Thabane
Lehana Thabane
APAlexandra Papaioannou
Alexandra Papaioannou
JAJonathan D. Adachi
Jonathan D. Adachi
OBJECTIVE We aimed to explore whether frailty was associated with fracture risk and whether frailty could modify the propensity of type 2 diabetes toward increased risk of fractures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Data were from a prospective cohort study. Our primary outcome was time to the first incident clinical fragility fracture; secondary outcomes included time to hip fracture and to clinical spine fracture. Frailty status was measured by a Frailty Index (FI) of deficit accumulation. Cox model incorporating an interaction term (frailty × diabetes) was used for analyses. RESULTS The analysis included 3,149 (70% women) participants; 138 (60% women) had diabetes. Higher bone mineral density and FI were observed in participants with diabetes compared with control subjects. A significant relationship between the FI and the risk of incident fragility fractures was found, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.02 (95% CI 1.01–1.03) and 1.19 (95% CI 1.10–1.33) for per-0.01 and per-0.10 FI increase, respectively. The interaction was also statistically significant (P = 0.018). The HR for per-0.1 increase in the FI was 1.33 for diabetes and 1.19 for nondiabetes if combining the estimate for the FI itself with the estimate from the interaction term. No evidence of interaction between frailty and diabetes was found for risk of hip and clinical spine fractures. CONCLUSIONS Participants with type 2 diabetes were significantly frailer than individuals without diabetes. Frailty increases the risk of fragility fracture and enhances the effect of diabetes on fragility fractures. Particular attention should be paid to diabetes as a risk factor for fragility fractures in those who are frail.

10 January 2020 in Frontiers in Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XCXuejiao Chen
Xuejiao Chen
WHWenfeng Hua
Wenfeng Hua
XHXin Huang
Xin Huang
YCYuming Chen
Yuming Chen
JZJunguo Zhang
Junguo Zhang
GLGuowei Li
Guowei Li
Osteoporosis is a metabolic skeletal disorder in which bone mass is depleted and bone structure is destroyed to the degree that bone becomes fragile and prone to fractures. Emerging evidence suggests that N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification, a novel epitranscriptomic marker, has a significant role in bone development and metabolism. M6A modification not only participates in bone development, but also plays important roles as writers and erasers in the osteoporosis. M6A methyltransferase METTL3 and demethyltransferase FTO involves in the delicate process between adipogenesis differentiation and osteogenic differentiation, which is important for the pathological development of osteoporosis. Conditional knockdown of the METTL3 in bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) could suppress PI3K-Akt signaling, limit the expression of bone formation-related genes (such as Runx2 and Osterix), restrain the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and down-regulate the decreased translation efficiency of parathyroid hormone receptor-1 mRNA. Meanwhile, knockdown of the METTL3 significantly promoted the adipogenesis process and janus kinase 1 (JAK1) protein expression via an m6A-dependent way. Specifically, there was a negative correlation between METTL3 expression and porcine BMSCs adipogenesis. The evidence above suggested that the relationship between METTL3 expression and adipogenesis was inverse, and osteogenesis was positive, respectively. Similarly, FTO regulated for BMSCs fate determination during osteoporosis through the GDF11-FTO-PPARγ axis, prompting the shift of MSC lineage commitment to adipocyte and inhibiting bone formation during osteoporosis. In this systematic review, we summarize the most up-to-date evidence of m6A RNA modification in osteoporosis and highlight the potential role of m6A in prevention, treatment, and management of osteoporosis.

XLXue Li
Xue Li
PSPeige Song
Peige Song
JLJun Li
Jun Li
YTYuchang Tao
Yuchang Tao
GLGuowei Li
Guowei Li
ZYZengli Yu
Zengli Yu
The temporal trend of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) incidence is reported to be increasing in worldwide regions; however, reports focusing on China are sparse. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the disease burden and clinical features of IBD in the Chinese population. We searched Medline, EMBASE, and another two Chinese databases. A parallel literature review and data extraction were conducted. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the summary incidence rate of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The constituent ratios with 95% CI were calculated for clinical phenotypes and classifications. The literature review included 47 publications. The summary incidence rate of IBD was 1.74 (95% CI: 1.08; 2.40) per 100,000 person years, and the corresponding incidence rates of CD and UC were 0.40 (95% CI: 0.23; 0.57) and 1.18 (95% CI: 0.81; 1.56) per 100,000 person years, respectively. The sex distribution analysis indicated a male predominance in both CD (sex ratio: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.47–1.84) and UC (sex ratio: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.21–1.38). The clinical characteristics were summarized using data from 2283 CD cases and 17,958 UC cases; in which the majority of CD patients were diagnosed between 17–40 years of age, with non-stricturing and non-penetrating disease, varied disease locations, and less extra-intestinal manifestation. UC cases were featured with later disease diagnosis, a more severe disease course, more segmental lesions, and less extra-intestinal manifestations. Our study provided an estimated disease burden of IBD and demonstrated distinct clinical features in the Chinese population. Large-scale population-based studies are needed to further evaluate these findings.

29 December 2017 in BMC Medical Research Methodology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGuowei Li
Guowei Li
LALuciana P. F. Abbade
Luciana P. F. Abbade
INIkunna Nwosu
Ikunna Nwosu
YJYanling Jin
Yanling Jin
ALAlvin Leenus
Alvin Leenus
LTLehana Thabane
Lehana Thabane
Evidence shows that research abstracts are commonly inconsistent with their corresponding full reports, and may mislead readers. In this scoping review, which is part of our series on the state of reporting of primary biomedical research, we summarized the evidence from systematic reviews and surveys, to investigate the current state of inconsistent abstract reporting, and to evaluate factors associated with improved reporting by comparing abstracts and their full reports. We searched EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and CINAHL from January 1st 1996 to September 30th 2016 to retrieve eligible systematic reviews and surveys. Our primary outcome was the level of inconsistency between abstracts and corresponding full reports, which was expressed as a percentage (with a lower percentage indicating better reporting) or categorized rating (such as major/minor difference, high/medium/low inconsistency), as reported by the authors. We used medians and interquartile ranges to describe the level of inconsistency across studies. No quantitative syntheses were conducted. Data from the included systematic reviews or surveys was summarized qualitatively. Seventeen studies that addressed this topic were included. The level of inconsistency was reported to have a median of 39% (interquartile range: 14% - 54%), and to range from 4% to 78%. In some studies that separated major from minor inconsistency, the level of major inconsistency ranged from 5% to 45% (median: 19%, interquartile range: 7% - 31%), which included discrepancies in specifying the study design or sample size, designating a primary outcome measure, presenting main results, and drawing a conclusion. A longer time interval between conference abstracts and the publication of full reports was found to be the only factor which was marginally or significantly associated with increased likelihood of reporting inconsistencies. This scoping review revealed that abstracts are frequently inconsistent with full reports, and efforts are needed to improve the consistency of abstract reporting in the primary biomedical community.