Katherine Loree Cook

Dr. Katherine Loree Cook

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 June 2014 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KCKatherine Loree Cook
Katherine Loree Cook
AWAnni Wärri
Anni Wärri
DSDavid R. Soto-Pantoja
David R. Soto-Pantoja
PCPamela Ag. Clarke
Pamela Ag. Clarke
MCM. Idalia Cruz
M. Idalia Cruz
RCRobert Clarke
Robert Clarke
Purpose: Estrogen receptor-α (ERα)-targeted therapies including tamoxifen (TAM) or Faslodex (ICI) are used to treat ER+ breast cancers. Up to 50% of tumors will acquire resistance to these interventions. Autophagy has been implicated as a major driver of antiestrogen resistance. We have explored the ability of chloroquine (CQ), which inhibits autophagy, to affect antiestrogen responsiveness. Experimental Design: TAM-resistant MCF7-RR and ICI-resistant/TAM cross-resistant LCC9 ER+ breast cancer cells were injected into mammary fat pads of female athymic mice and treated with TAM and/or ICI in combination with oral low-dose CQ. Results: We show that CQ can increase antiestrogen responsiveness in MCF7-RR and LCC9 cells and tumors, likely through the inhibition of autophagy. However, the combination of ICI+CQ was less effective than CQ alone in vivo, unlike the TAM+CQ combination. Antiestrogen treatment stimulated angiogenesis in tumors but did not prevent CQ effectiveness. The lower efficacy of ICI+CQ was associated with ICI effects on cell-mediated immunity within the tumor microenvironment. The mouse chemokine KC (CXCL1) and IFNγ were differentially regulated by both TAM and ICI treatments, suggesting a possible effect on macrophage development/activity. Consistent with these observations, TAM+CQ treatment increased tumor CD68+ cells infiltration, whereas ICI and ICI+CQ reduced peripheral tumor macrophage content. Moreover, macrophage elimination of breast cancer target cells in vitro was reduced following exposure to ICI. Conclusion: CQ restores antiestrogen sensitivity to resistant tumors. Moreover, the beneficial combination of TAM+CQ suggests a positive outcome for ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials using this combination for the treatment of ER+ ductal carcinoma in situ lesions. Clin Cancer Res; 20(12); 3222–32. ©2014 AACR.

14 March 2012 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RCRobert Clarke
Robert Clarke
KCKatherine Loree Cook
Katherine Loree Cook
RHRong Hu
Rong Hu
CFCaroline O.B. Facey
Caroline O.B. Facey
ITIman Tavassoly
Iman Tavassoly
ASAyeasha Shajahan-Haq
Ayeasha Shajahan-Haq
How breast cancer cells respond to the stress of endocrine therapies determines whether they will acquire a resistant phenotype or execute a cell-death pathway. After a survival signal is successfully executed, a cell must decide whether it should replicate. How these cell-fate decisions are regulated is unclear, but evidence suggests that the signals that determine these outcomes are highly integrated. Central to the final cell-fate decision is signaling from the unfolded protein response, which can be activated following the sensing of stress within the endoplasmic reticulum. The duration of the response to stress is partly mediated by the duration of inositol-requiring enzyme-1 activation following its release from heat shock protein A5. The resulting signals appear to use several B-cell lymphoma-2 family members to both suppress apoptosis and activate autophagy. Changes in metabolism induced by cellular stress are key components of this regulatory system, and further adaptation of the metabolome is affected in response to stress. Here we describe the unfolded protein response, autophagy, and apoptosis, and how the regulation of these processes is integrated. Central topologic features of the signaling network that integrate cell-fate regulation and decision execution are discussed. Cancer Res; 72(6); 1321–31. ©2012 AACR.

1 October 2018 in Cell Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CSCarol A. Shively
Carol A. Shively
TRThomas C. Register
Thomas C. Register
SASusan E. Appt
Susan E. Appt
TCThomas B. Clarkson
Thomas B. Clarkson
BUBeth Uberseder
Beth Uberseder
KCKatherine Loree Cook
Katherine Loree Cook
Recent identification of a mammary gland-specific microbiome led to studies investigating bacteria populations in breast cancer. Malignant breast tumors have lower Lactobacillus abundance compared with benign lesions, implicating Lactobacillus as a negative regulator of breast cancer. Diet is a main determinant of gut microbial diversity. Whether diet affects breast microbiome populations is unknown. In a non-human primate model, we found that consumption of a Western or Mediterranean diet modulated mammary gland microbiota and metabolite profiles. Mediterranean diet consumption led to increased mammary gland Lactobacillus abundance compared with Western diet-fed monkeys. Moreover, mammary glands from Mediterranean diet-fed monkeys had higher levels of bile acid metabolites and increased bacterial-processed bioactive compounds. These data suggest that diet directly influences microbiome populations outside the intestinal tract in distal sites such as the mammary gland. Our study demonstrates that diet affects the mammary gland microbiome, establishing an alternative mechanistic pathway for breast cancer prevention.

1 August 2011 in Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KCKatherine Loree Cook
Katherine Loree Cook
ASAyeasha Shajahan-Haq
Ayeasha Shajahan-Haq
RCRobert Clarke
Robert Clarke
The American Cancer Society estimates that over 200,000 new breast cancer cases are diagnosed annually in the USA alone. Of these cases, the majority are invasive breast cancers and almost 70% are ...

1 July 2012 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KCKatherine Loree Cook
Katherine Loree Cook
ASAyeasha Shajahan-Haq
Ayeasha Shajahan-Haq
AWAnni Wärri
Anni Wärri
LJLu Jin
Lu Jin
LHLeena A. Hilakivi-Clarke
Leena A. Hilakivi-Clarke
RCRobert Clarke
Robert Clarke
While more than 70% of breast cancers express estrogen receptor-α (ER+), endocrine therapies targeting these receptors often fail. The molecular mechanisms that underlie treatment resistance remain unclear. We investigated the potential role of glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) in mediating estrogen resistance. Human breast tumors showed increased GRP78 expression when compared with normal breast tissues. However, GRP78 expression was reduced in ER+ breast tumors compared with HER2-amplifed or triple-negative breast tumors. ER+ antiestrogen-resistant cells and ER+ tumors with an acquired resistant antiestrogen phenotype were both shown to overexpress GRP78, which was not observed in cases of de novo resistance. Knockdown of GRP78 restored antiestrogen sensitivity in resistant cells, and overexpression of GRP78 promoted resistance in sensitive cells. Mechanistically, GRP78 integrated multiple cellular signaling pathways to inhibit apoptosis and stimulate prosurvival autophagy, which was dependent on TSC2/AMPK-mediated mTOR inhibition but not on beclin-1. Inhibition of autophagy prevented GRP78-mediated endocrine resistance, whereas caspase inhibition abrogated the resensitization that resulted from GRP78 loss. Simultaneous knockdown of GRP78 and beclin-1 synergistically restored antiestrogen sensitivity in resistant cells. Together, our findings reveal a novel role for GRP78 in the integration of cellular signaling pathways including the unfolded protein response, apoptosis, and autophagy to determine cell fate in response to antiestrogen therapy. Cancer Res; 72(13); 3337–49. ©2012 AACR.

18 October 2019 in Molecular Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAkiko Chiba
Akiko Chiba
ABAlaa Bawaneh
Alaa Bawaneh
CVChristine Velazquez
Christine Velazquez
KCKenysha Y.J. Clear
Kenysha Y.J. Clear
AWAdam S. Wilson
Adam S. Wilson
KCKatherine Loree Cook
Katherine Loree Cook
Breast tumors have their own specific microbiota, distinct from normal mammary gland tissue. Patients with breast cancer that present with locally advanced disease often undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy to reduce tumor size prior to surgery to allow breast conservation or limit axillary lymph node dissection. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy modulates the tumor microbiome and the potential impact of microbes on breast cancer signaling. Using snap-frozen aseptically collected breast tumor tissue from women who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 15) or women with no prior therapy at time of surgery (n = 18), we performed 16S rRNA-sequencing to identify tumoral bacterial populations. We also stained breast tumor microarrays to confirm presence of identified microbiota. Using bacteria-conditioned media, we determined the effect of bacterial metabolites on breast cancer cell proliferation and doxorubicin therapy responsiveness. We show chemotherapy administration significantly increased breast tumor Pseudomonas spp. Primary breast tumors from patients who developed distant metastases displayed increased tumoral abundance of Brevundimonas and Staphylococcus. We confirmed presence of Pseudomonas in breast tumor tissue by IHC staining. Treatment of breast cancer cells with Pseudomonas aeruginosa conditioned media differentially effected proliferation in a dose-dependent manner and modulated doxorubicin-mediated cell death. Our results indicate chemotherapy shifts the breast tumor microbiome and specific microbes correlate with tumor recurrence. Further studies with a larger patient cohort may provide greater insights into the role of microbiota in therapeutic outcome and develop novel bacterial biomarkers that could predict distant metastases. Implications: Breast tumor microbiota are modified by therapy and affects molecular signaling.