Background: Preliminary evidence suggests that diet manipulation may influence motor and nonmotor symptoms in PD, but conflict exists regarding the ideal fat to carbohydrate ratio.Objectives: We designed a pilot randomized, controlled trial to compare the plausibility, safety, and efficacy of a low‐fat, high‐carbohydrate diet versus a ketogenic diet in a hospital clinic of PD patients.Methods: We developed a protocol to support PD patients in a diet study and randomly assigned patients to a low‐fat or ketogenic diet. Primary outcomes were within‐ and between‐group changes in MDS‐UPDRS Parts 1 to 4 over 8 weeks.Results: We randomized 47 patients, of which 44 commenced the diets and 38 completed the study (86% completion rate for patients commencing the diets). The ketogenic diet group maintained physiological ketosis. Both groups significantly decreased their MDS‐UPDRS scores, but the ketogenic group decreased more in Part 1 (−4.58 ± 2.17 points, representing a 41% improvement in baseline Part 1 scores) compared to the low‐fat group (−0.99 ± 3.63 points, representing an 11% improvement) (P < 0.001), with the largest between‐group decreases observed for urinary problems, pain and other sensations, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and cognitive impairment. There were no between‐group differences in the magnitude of decrease for Parts 2 to 4. The most common adverse effects were excessive hunger in the low‐fat group and intermittent exacerbation of the PD tremor and/or rigidity in the ketogenic group.Conclusions: It is plausible and safe for PD patients to maintain a low‐fat or ketogenic diet for 8 weeks. Both diet groups significantly improved in motor and nonmotor symptoms; however, the ketogenic group showed greater improvements in nonmotor symptoms. © 2018 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Background: Brain energy metabolism is impaired in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which may be mitigated by a ketogenic diet. We conducted a randomized crossover trial to determine whether a 12-week modified ketogenic diet improved cognition, daily function, or quality of life in a hospital clinic of AD patients. Methods: We randomly assigned patients with clinically confirmed diagnoses of AD to a modified ketogenic diet or usual diet supplemented with low-fat healthy-eating guidelines and enrolled them in a single-phase, assessor-blinded, two-period crossover trial (two 12-week treatment periods, separated by a 10-week washout period). Primary outcomes were mean within-individual changes in the Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination - III (ACE-III) scale, AD Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) inventory, and Quality of Life in AD (QOL-AD) questionnaire over 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes considered changes in cardiovascular risk factors and adverse effects. Results: We randomized 26 patients, of whom 21 (81%) completed the ketogenic diet; only one withdrawal was attributed to the ketogenic diet. While on the ketogenic diet, patients achieved sustained physiological ketosis (12-week mean beta-hydroxybutyrate level: 0.95 ± 0.34 mmol/L). Compared with usual diet, patients on the ketogenic diet increased their mean within-individual ADCS-ADL (+ 3.13 ± 5.01 points, P = 0.0067) and QOL-AD (+ 3.37 ± 6.86 points, P = 0.023) scores; the ACE-III also increased, but not significantly (+ 2.12 ± 8.70 points, P = 0.24). Changes in cardiovascular risk factors were mostly favourable, and adverse effects were mild. Conclusions: This is the first randomized trial to investigate the impact of a ketogenic diet in patients with uniform diagnoses of AD. High rates of retention, adherence, and safety appear to be achievable in applying a 12-week modified ketogenic diet to AD patients. Compared with a usual diet supplemented with low-fat healthy-eating guidelines, patients on the ketogenic diet improved in daily function and quality of life, two factors of great importance to people living with dementia. Trial registration: This trial is registered on the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12618001450202. The trial was registered on August 28, 2018.

Fasting is deeply entrenched in evolution, yet its potential applications to today’s most common, disabling neurological diseases remain relatively unexplored. Fasting induces an altered metabolic state that optimizes neuron bioenergetics, plasticity, and resilience in a way that may counteract a broad array of neurological disorders. In both animals and humans, fasting prevents and treats the metabolic syndrome, a major risk factor for many neurological diseases. In animals, fasting probably prevents the formation of tumors, possibly treats established tumors, and improves tumor responses to chemotherapy. In human cancers, including cancers that involve the brain, fasting ameliorates chemotherapy-related adverse effects and may protect normal cells from chemotherapy. Fasting improves cognition, stalls age-related cognitive decline, usually slows neurodegeneration, reduces brain damage and enhances functional recovery after stroke, and mitigates the pathological and clinical features of epilepsy and multiple sclerosis in animal models. Primarily due to a lack of research, the evidence supporting fasting as a treatment in human neurological disorders, including neurodegeneration, stroke, epilepsy, and multiple sclerosis, is indirect or non-existent. Given the strength of the animal evidence, many exciting discoveries may lie ahead, awaiting future investigations into the viability of fasting as a therapy in neurological disease.

Huntington's disease (HD) is a progressive, fatal neurodegenerative disorder with limited treatment options. Substantial evidence implicates mitochondria dysfunction in brain and skeletal muscle in the pathogenesis of HD. Metabolic strategies, such as fasting and ketogenic diets, theoretically enhance brain and muscle metabolism and mitochondria function, which may improve the clinical symptoms of HD. We report the case of a 41-year-old man with progressive, deteriorating HD who pursued a time-restricted ketogenic diet (TRKD) for 48 weeks. Improvements were measured in his motor symptoms (52% improvement from baseline), activities of daily living (28% improvement), composite Unified HD Rating Scale (cUHDRS) score (20% improvement), HD-related behavior problems (apathy, disorientation, anger, and irritability improved by 50–100%), and mood-related quality of life (25% improvement). Cognition did not improve. Weight remained stable and there were no significant adverse effects. This case study is unique in that a patient with progressive, deteriorating HD was managed with a TRKD, with subsequent improvements in his motor symptoms, activities of daily living, cUHDRS score, most major HD-related behavior problems, and quality of life. Our patient remains dedicated to his TRKD, which continues to provide benefit for him and his family.

Neurodegenerative disorders are typically “split” based on their hallmark clinical, anatomical, and pathological features, but they can also be “lumped” by a shared feature of impaired mitochondrial biology. This leads us to present a scientific framework that conceptualizes Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and Huntington’s disease (HD) as “metabolic icebergs” comprised of a tip, a bulk, and a base. The visible tip conveys the hallmark neurological symptoms, neurodegenerative regions, and neuronal protein aggregates for each disorder. The hidden bulk depicts impaired mitochondrial biology throughout the body, which is multifaceted and may be subdivided into impaired cellular metabolism, cell-specific mitotypes, and mitochondrial behaviours, functions, activities, and features. The underlying base encompasses environmental factors, especially modern industrial toxins, dietary lifestyles, and cognitive, physical, and psychosocial behaviours, but also accommodates genetic factors specific to familial forms of AD, PD, and ALS, as well as HD. Over years or decades, chronic exposure to a particular suite of environmental and genetic factors at the base elicits a trajectory of impaired mitochondrial biology that maximally impacts particular subsets of mitotypes in the bulk, which eventually surfaces as the hallmark features of a particular neurodegenerative disorder at the tip. We propose that impaired mitochondrial biology can be repaired and recalibrated by activating “mitohormesis”, which is optimally achieved using strategies that facilitate a balanced oscillation between mitochondrial stressor and recovery phases. Sustainably harnessing mitohormesis may constitute a potent preventative and therapeutic measure for people at risk of, or suffering with, neurodegenerative disorders.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumour in adults. The standard of care consists of surgical resection and concurrent chemoradiation, followed by adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. This protocol is associated with a median survival of 12‑15 months, and 3 years. Ketogenic metabolic therapy (KMT) targets cancer cell metabolism by restricting glucose availability and evoking differential stress resistance and sensitization, which may augment the standard treatments and lead to therapeutic benefit. The present study reports the case of a 64‑year‑old woman with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)‑wildtype GBM who pursued the standard treatment protocol in conjunction with an intensive, multimodal KMT program for 3 years. The KMT program consisted of a series of prolonged (7‑day, fluid‑only) fasts, which were specifically timed to maximize the tolerability and efficacy of the standard treatments, combined with a time‑restricted ketogenic diet on all other days. During the first and second treatment years the patient sustained a glucose ketone index (GKI) of 1.65 and 2.02, respectively, which coincided with complete clinical improvement, a healthy body‑mass index and a high quality of life, with no visible progressive tumour detected on imaging at the end of the second year. In the setting of the death of an immediate family member leading to increased life stress, slightly relaxed KMT adherence, and a higher GKI of 3.20, slow cancer progression occurred during the third year. The adverse effects attributed to KMT were mild. Despite the limitations of this case report, it highlights the feasibility of implementing the standard treatment protocol for GBM in conjunction with an intensive, long‑term, multimodal and specifically timed KMT program, the potential therapeutic efficacy of which may depend upon achieving as low a GKI as possible.