Mikhail Arshinov

Dr. Mikhail Arshinov

V.E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IAO SB RAS), 1, Academician Zuev square, 634055 Tomsk, Russia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 October 2018 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TNTuomo Nieminen
Tuomo Nieminen
Veli-Matti KerminenVeli-Matti Kerminen
Veli-Matti Kerminen
TPTuukka Petäjä
Tuukka Petäjä
PAPasi P. Aalto
Pasi P. Aalto
Mikhail ArshinovMikhail Arshinov
Mikhail Arshinov
MKMarkku Kulmala
Markku Kulmala
Atmospheric new particle formation (NPF) is an important phenomenon in terms of global particle number concentrations. Here we investigated the frequency of NPF, formation rates of 10 nm particles, and growth rates in the size range of 10–25 nm using at least 1 year of aerosol number size-distribution observations at 36 different locations around the world. The majority of these measurement sites are in the Northern Hemisphere. We found that the NPF frequency has a strong seasonal variability. At the measurement sites analyzed in this study, NPF occurs most frequently in March–May (on about 30 % of the days) and least frequently in December–February (about 10 % of the days). The median formation rate of 10 nm particles varies by about 3 orders of magnitude (0.01–10 cm−3 s−1) and the growth rate by about an order of magnitude (1–10 nm h−1). The smallest values of both formation and growth rates were observed at polar sites and the largest ones in urban environments or anthropogenically influenced rural sites. The correlation between the NPF event frequency and the particle formation and growth rate was at best moderate among the different measurement sites, as well as among the sites belonging to a certain environmental regime. For a better understanding of atmospheric NPF and its regional importance, we would need more observational data from different urban areas in practically all parts of the world, from additional remote and rural locations in North America, Asia, and most of the Southern Hemisphere (especially Australia), from polar areas, and from at least a few locations over the oceans.

17 December 2018 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EEEkaterina Ezhova
Ekaterina Ezhova
IYIlona Ylivinkka
Ilona Ylivinkka
JKJoel Kuusk
Joel Kuusk
KKKaupo Komsaare
Kaupo Komsaare
MVMarko Vana
Marko Vana
MKMarkku Kulmala
Markku Kulmala
The effect of aerosol loading on solar radiation and the subsequent effect on photosynthesis is a relevant question for estimating climate feedback mechanisms. This effect is quantified in the present study using ground-based measurements from five remote sites in boreal and hemiboreal (coniferous and mixed) forests of Eurasia. The diffuse fraction of global radiation associated with the direct effect of aerosols, i.e. excluding the effect of clouds, increases with an increase in the aerosol loading. The increase in the diffuse fraction of global radiation from approximately 0.11 on days characterized by low aerosol loading to 0.2–0.27 on days with relatively high aerosol loading leads to an increase in gross primary production (GPP) between 6 % and 14 % at all sites. The largest increase in GPP (relative to days with low aerosol loading) is observed for two types of ecosystems: a coniferous forest at high latitudes and a mixed forest at the middle latitudes. For the former ecosystem the change in GPP due to the relatively large increase in the diffuse radiation is compensated for by the moderate increase in the light use efficiency. For the latter ecosystem, the increase in the diffuse radiation is smaller for the same aerosol loading, but the smaller change in GPP due to this relationship between radiation and aerosol loading is compensated for by the higher increase in the light use efficiency. The dependence of GPP on the diffuse fraction of solar radiation has a weakly pronounced maximum related to clouds.

24 January 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RJRajesh Janardanan
Rajesh Janardanan
Shamil MaksyutovShamil Maksyutov
Shamil Maksyutov
ATAki Tsuruta
Aki Tsuruta
FWFenjuan Wang
Fenjuan Wang
YTYogesh K. Tiwari
Yogesh K. Tiwari
TMTsuneo Matsunaga
Tsuneo Matsunaga
We employed a global high-resolution inverse model to optimize the CH4 emission using Greenhouse gas Observing Satellite (GOSAT) and surface observation data for a period from 2011–2017 for the two main source categories of anthropogenic and natural emissions. We used the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR v4.3.2) for anthropogenic methane emission and scaled them by country to match the national inventories reported to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Wetland and soil sink prior fluxes were simulated using the Vegetation Integrative Simulator of Trace gases (VISIT) model. Biomass burning prior fluxes were provided by the Global Fire Assimilation System (GFAS). We estimated a global total anthropogenic and natural methane emissions of 340.9 Tg CH4 yr−1 and 232.5 Tg CH4 yr−1, respectively. Country-scale analysis of the estimated anthropogenic emissions showed that all the top-emitting countries showed differences with their respective inventories to be within the uncertainty range of the inventories, confirming that the posterior anthropogenic emissions did not deviate from nationally reported values. Large countries, such as China, Russia, and the United States, had the mean estimated emission of 45.7 ± 8.6, 31.9 ± 7.8, and 29.8 ± 7.8 Tg CH4 yr−1, respectively. For natural wetland emissions, we estimated large emissions for Brazil (39.8 ± 12.4 Tg CH4 yr−1), the United States (25.9 ± 8.3 Tg CH4 yr−1), Russia (13.2 ± 9.3 Tg CH4 yr−1), India (12.3 ± 6.4 Tg CH4 yr−1), and Canada (12.2 ± 5.1 Tg CH4 yr−1). In both emission categories, the major emitting countries all had the model corrections to emissions within the uncertainty range of inventories. The advantages of the approach used in this study were: (1) use of high-resolution transport, useful for simulations near emission hotspots, (2) prior anthropogenic emissions adjusted to the UNFCCC reports, (3) combining surface and satellite observations, which improves the estimation of both natural and anthropogenic methane emissions over spatial scale of countries.

22 November 2016 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HLHanna K. Lappalainen
Hanna K. Lappalainen
Veli-Matti KerminenVeli-Matti Kerminen
Veli-Matti Kerminen
TPTuukka Petäjä
Tuukka Petäjä
TKTheo Kurtén
Theo Kurtén
Alexander BaklanovAlexander Baklanov
Alexander Baklanov
MKMarkku Kulmala
Markku Kulmala
The northern Eurasian regions and Arctic Ocean will very likely undergo substantial changes during the next decades. The Arctic–boreal natural environments play a crucial role in the global climate via albedo change, carbon sources and sinks as well as atmospheric aerosol production from biogenic volatile organic compounds. Furthermore, it is expected that global trade activities, demographic movement, and use of natural resources will be increasing in the Arctic regions. There is a need for a novel research approach, which not only identifies and tackles the relevant multi-disciplinary research questions, but also is able to make a holistic system analysis of the expected feedbacks. In this paper, we introduce the research agenda of the Pan-Eurasian Experiment (PEEX), a multi-scale, multi-disciplinary and international program started in 2012 (https://www.atm.helsinki.fi/peex/). PEEX sets a research approach by which large-scale research topics are investigated from a system perspective and which aims to fill the key gaps in our understanding of the feedbacks and interactions between the land–atmosphere–aquatic–society continuum in the northern Eurasian region. We introduce here the state of the art for the key topics in the PEEX research agenda and present the future prospects of the research, which we see relevant in this context.

23 July 2020 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RFRyo Fujita
Ryo Fujita
SMShinji Morimoto
Shinji Morimoto
Shamil MaksyutovShamil Maksyutov
Shamil Maksyutov
HKHeon‐Sook Kim
Heon‐Sook Kim
Mikhail ArshinovMikhail Arshinov
Mikhail Arshinov
TNTakakiyo Nakazawa
Takakiyo Nakazawa
To better understand the current global CH4 budget, biogenic, fossil fuel, and biomass burning CH4 fluxes for the period 1995–2013 were inversely estimated from the observed mole fraction data of atmospheric CH4 using a three‐dimensional chemical transport model. Then, forward simulations of carbon and hydrogen isotope ratios of atmospheric CH4 (δ13C‐CH4 and δD‐CH4) were conducted using the inversion fluxes to evaluate the source proportion of the global total CH4 emission. Model‐simulated spatiotemporal variations of atmospheric CH4 reproduce the observational results well; however, the simulated δ13C‐CH4 and δD‐CH4 values significantly underestimate their observed values as a whole. This implies that the proportion of biogenic CH4 sources in the global CH4 emission, deduced by inverse modeling, is overestimated, although the proportion is fairly comparable with the medians of recent multiple CH4 inverse modeling. To reduce the disagreement between the observed and calculated isotope ratios, the CH4 fluxes of individual source categories were adjusted using our atmospheric δ13C‐CH4 and δD‐CH4 data observed at Arctic and Antarctic surface stations. The resultant global average biogenic, fossil fuel, and biomass burning CH4 fluxes over 2003–2012 are 346 ± 11, 162 ± 2, and 50 ± 2 TgCH4 year−1, respectively. It is also strongly suggested that the leveling‐off of atmospheric CH4 in the early 2000s and the renewed growth after 2006/2007 are, respectively, explainable by the decrease in biogenic and biomass burning CH4 emissions for 2000–2006 and the increase in biogenic CH4 emissions after that period. These emission changes mainly originate in the tropics.

17 August 2020 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLXin Lin
Xin Lin
BRBrendan Rogers
Brendan Rogers
CSColm Sweeney
Colm Sweeney
FCFrédéric Chevallier
Frédéric Chevallier
Mikhail ArshinovMikhail Arshinov
Mikhail Arshinov
GKGretchen Keppel-Aleks
Gretchen Keppel-Aleks
Significance: The increasing atmospheric CO 2 seasonal cycle amplitude in the Northern Hemisphere suggests northern ecosystems are responding strongly to global change. Considerable uncertainties remain regarding drivers of these changes and their locations. We find that seasonal flux changes in Siberian and temperate ecosystems together shape the increasing CO 2 amplitude. Particularly, enhanced seasonal carbon exchange in Siberia drives most of observed amplitude increases at the surface of northern high latitudes. Arctic-boreal North America shows much smaller changes in flux seasonality and has only localized impacts, consistent with more browning in this region from field and satellite observations. Our findings highlight divergent ecosystem responses among regions, countering the simple narrative that CO 2 fertilization and climate warming are the dominant drivers.