Dermal immunization using antigen-coated microneedle arrays is a promising vaccination strategy. However, reduction of microneedle sharpness and the available surface area for antigen coating is a limiting factor. To overcome these obstacles, a layer-by-layer coating approach can be applied onto pH-sensitive microneedles. Following this approach, pH-sensitive microneedle arrays (positively charged at coating pH5.8 and nearly uncharged at pH7.4) were alternatingly coated with negatively charged diphtheria toxoid (DT) and N-trimethyl chitosan (TMC), a cationic adjuvant. First, the optimal DT dose for intradermal immunization was determined in a dose-response study, which revealed that low-dose intradermal immunization was more efficient than subcutaneous immunization and that the EC50 dose of DT upon intradermal immunization is 3-fold lower, as compared to subcutaneous immunization. In a subsequent immunization study, microneedle arrays coated with an increasing number (2, 5, and 10) of DT/TMC bilayers resulted in step-wise increasing DT-specific immune responses. Dermal immunization with microneedle arrays coated with 10 bilayers of DT/TMC (corresponding with ±0.6μg DT delivered intradermally) resulted in similar DT-specific immune responses as subcutaneous immunization with 5μg of DT adjuvanted with aluminum phosphate (8-fold dose reduction). Summarizing, the layer-by-layer coating approach onto pH-sensitive microneedles is a versatile method to precisely control the amount of coated and dermally-delivered antigen that is highly suitable for dermal immunization.

Cationic liposomes are potential adjuvants for influenza vaccines. In a previous study we reported that among a panel of cationic liposomes loaded with influenza hemagglutinin (HA), DC-Chol:DPPC (1:1 molar ratio) liposomes induced the strongest immune response. However, it is not clear whether the cholesterol (Chol) backbone or the tertiary amine head group of DC-Chol was responsible for this. Therefore, in the present work we studied the influence of Chol in the lipid bilayer of cationic liposomes. Moreover, we investigated the effect of the HA loading method (adsorption versus encapsulation) and the encapsulation of immune modulators in DC-Chol liposomes on the immunogenicity of HA. Liposomes consisting of a neutral lipid (DPPC or Chol) and a cationic compound (DC-Chol, DDA, or eDPPC) were produced by film hydration-extrusion with/without an encapsulated immune modulator (CpG or imiquimod). The liposomes generally showed comparable size distribution, zeta potential and HA loading. In vitro studies with monocyte-derived human dendritic cells and immunization studies in C57Bl/6 mice showed that: (1) liposome-adsorbed HA is more immunogenic than encapsulated HA; (2) the incorporation of Chol in the bilayer of cationic liposomes enhances their adjuvant effect; and (3) CpG loaded liposomes are more efficient at enhancing HA-specific humoral responses than plain liposomes or Alhydrogel.

Aims: To evaluate feasibility of intradermal (i.d.) adalimumab administration using hollow microneedles, and to compare a single i.d. dose of adalimumab using a hollow microneedle with a single subcutaneous (s.c.) dose using a conventional needle.Methods: In this single‐centre double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, double‐dummy clinical trial in 24 healthy adults we compared 40 mg adalimumab (0.4 mL) administered i.d. using a hollow microneedle with a s.c. dose using a conventional needle. Primary parameters were pain, acceptability and local tolerability; secondary parameters safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. We explored usability of optical coherence tomography, clinical photography, thermal imaging, and laser speckle contrast imaging to evaluate skin reaction after i.d. injections. In vitro protein analysis was performed to assess compatibility of adalimumab with the hollow microneedle device.Results: While feasible and safe, injection pain of i.d. adalimumab was higher compared to s.c. adalimumab (35.4 vs. 7.9 on a 100‐point visual analogue scale). Initial absorption rate and relative bioavailability were higher after i.d. adalimumab (time to maximum plasma concentration = 95 h [47–120]; F_rel = 129% [6.46%]) compared to s.c. adalimumab (time to maximum plasma concentration = 120 h [96–221]). Anti‐adalimumab antibodies were detected in 50% and 83% of the subjects after i.d. and s.c. adalimumab, respectively. We observed statistically significantly more erythema and skin perfusion after i.d. adalimumab, compared to s.c. adalimumab and placebo injections (P < .0001). Cytokine secretion after whole blood lipopolysaccharide challenge was comparable between administration routes.Conclusions: Intradermal injection of adalimumab using hollowing microneedles was perceived as more painful and less accepted than s.c. administration, but yields a higher relative bioavailability with similar safety and pharmacodynamic effects.

Antigenic peptide-loaded cationic liposomes have shown promise as cancer vaccines. Quantification of both peptides and lipids is critical for quality control of such vaccines for clinical translation. In this work we describe a reversed phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography (RP-UPLC) method that separates lipids (DOTAP, DOPC and their degradation products) and two physicochemically different peptides within 12 min. Samples were prepared by dilution in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of methanol and water. Peptide quantifi-cation was done via UV detection and lipids were quantified by an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD), both coupled to the RP-UPLC system, with high precision (RSD < 3.5%). We showed that the presence of lipids and peptides did not mutually influence their quantification. Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ), as determined in the ICH guidelines, were 6 and 20 ng for DOTAP, 12 ng and 40 ng for DOPC, 3.0 ng and 8.0 ng for peptide A and 2.4 ng and 7.2 ng for the more hydrophobic peptide B. Finally, lipid degradation of DOTAP and DOPC was monitored in peptide loaded DOTAP:DOPC liposomes upon storage at 4 degrees C and 40 degrees C.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Pharmacists Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)