Background: Nepal has made incremental progress in improving coverage of maternal health services leading to improved health outcomes. Government and other health sector stakeholders have consistently considered dissemination of educational messages on maternal health through mass media. However, in Nepal’s context, the media’s influence on the uptake of maternal health services is less known. This study examines the links between media exposure and maternal health service use in Nepal. Method: Our analysis is based on the nationally representative Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) 2022 data. We analyzed data from 1933 women aged 15–49 who had given birth in the two years preceding the survey. Weight analysis was performed to account for complex survey design. We presented categorical variables as frequency, percentage, and corresponding 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between media exposure and maternal health service use, and the results are presented as crude (COR) and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) along with 95% CI. Results: Women exposed to internet use had 1.59 times [AOR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.16, 2.19], and those exposed to radio and television health programs had 1.73 times [AOR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.17, 2.56] higher odds of having four or more Antenatal Care (ANC) visits. Similarly, women exposed to mass media had 1.32 times [AOR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.74] and those exposed to health programs had 1.50 times [AOR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.02, 2.21] higher odds of having an institutional delivery. However, mass media exposure, internet use, and health program exposure were not significantly associated with increased postnatal care of mother and newborn. Conclusion: Exposure to health programs and internet use are positively associated with four or more ANC visits. Exposure to mass media and health programs are positively associated with increased institutional delivery. Our findings imply that well-designed campaigns and awareness programs delivered through mass media platforms play a vital role in enhancing the uptake of maternal health services.

Healthcare waste management is the subject of a neglected issue in many developing countries. Health care facilities are facing a major challenge in handling healthcare wastes and reducing their potential risks to human health and the environment. Insufficient understanding of the risk associated with healthcare waste by health workforce can contribute to poor waste management practices. The main aim of this study is to assess risk perception towards healthcare waste among hospital attendants and to identify associated factors. We carried out a cross-sectional hospital-based study among 120 attendants of a private and public hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. We used two-stage random sampling for the selection of hospital and participants. We conducted a face-to-face interview with the participants using semi-structured questionnaires. Based on the mean score, we classified risk perception as good and poor. Bivariate and multivariate analysis was carried out to determine associates of risk perception towards healthcare waste. Approximately 51.0% of hospital attendants had poor risk perception of healthcare waste. Nearly half of the participants (49.2%) had inadequate knowledge and 43.0% had a negative attitude. Factors such as healthcare waste management training (p = 0.028), housekeeping department (p = 0.036) and attitude (p = 0.001) were associated with risk perception of healthcare waste. Hospital attendants had a poor understanding of risk perception of healthcare waste. Periodic training on healthcare waste management and edification on the risk associated with healthcare waste is essential to boost awareness among all healthcare workers. Communication on behavioral improvements for appropriate waste management must be prioritized to change the perception of health workers.

Healthcare waste management is a serious issue in context of developing countries. Better assessment of both risks and effects of exposure would permit improvements in the management of healthcare waste. However, there is not yet clear understanding of risks, and as consequences, inadequate management practices are often implemented. This study primarily aims to assess risk perception towards healthcare waste and secondly to assess knowledge, attitude and identify the factors associated with risk perception. A cross-sectional community based study was carried out among 270 respondents selected through multistage sampling technique. Face-to-face interview was conducted using semi-structured questionnaires. Risk perception was classified as good and poor based on mean score. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine the associates of risk perception. More than half, 52% of the sampled population had a poor risk perception towards healthcare waste. More than a quarter 26.3% had inadequate knowledge and forty percent (40%) had a negative attitude towards health care waste management. Having knowledge (OR = 3.31; CI = 1.67–6.58) was a strong predictor of risk perception towards healthcare waste. The perception of risk towards healthcare waste among community people was poor. This highlights the need for extensive awareness programs. Promoting knowledge on healthcare waste is a way to change the perception in Nepal. Community engaged research approach is needed to address environmental health concerns among public residents.

Background: Improvements in standard precaution related to infection prevention and control (IPC) at the national and local-level health facilities (HFs) are critical to ensuring patient’s safety, preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), mitigating Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), protecting health workers, and improving trust in HFs. This study aimed to assess HF’s readiness to implement standard precautions for IPC in Nepal. Methods: This study conducted a secondary analysis of the nationally-representative Nepal Health Facility Survey (NHFS) 2021 data and used the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) Manual from the World Health Organization (WHO) to examine the HF’s readiness to implement standard precautions for IPC. The readiness score for IPC was calculated for eight service delivery domains based on the availability of eight tracer items: guidelines for standard precautions, latex gloves, soap and running water or alcohol-based hand rub, single use of standard disposal or auto-disable syringes, disinfectant, safe final disposal of sharps, safe final disposal of infectious wastes, and appropriate storage of infectious waste. We used simple and multiple linear regression and quantile regression models to examine the association of HF’s readiness with their characteristics. Results were presented as beta (β) coefficients and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: The overall readiness scores of all HFs, federal/provincial hospitals, local HFs, and private hospitals were 59.9±15.6, 67.1±14.4, 59.6±15.6, and 62.6±15.5, respectively. Across all eight health service delivery domains, the HFs’ readiness for tuberculosis services was the lowest (57.8±20.0) and highest for delivery and newborn care services (67.1±15.6). The HFs performing quality assurance activities (β = 3.68; 95%CI: 1.84, 5.51), reviewing clients’ opinions (β = 6.66; 95%CI: 2.54, 10.77), and HFs with a monthly meeting (β = 3.28; 95%CI: 1.08, 5.49) had higher readiness scores. The HFs from Bagmati, Gandaki, Lumbini, Karnali and Sudurpaschim had readiness scores higher by 7.80 (95%CI: 5.24, 10.36), 7.73 (95%CI: 4.83, 10.62), 4.76 (95%CI: 2.00, 7.52), 9.40 (95%CI: 6.11, 12.68), and 3.77 (95%CI: 0.81, 6.74) compared to Koshi. Conclusion: The readiness of HFs to implement standard precautions was higher in HFs with quality assurance activities, monthly HF meetings, and mechanisms for reviewing clients’ opinions. Emphasizing quality assurance activities, implementing client feedback mechanisms, and promoting effective management practices in HFs with poor readiness can help to enhance IPC efforts.

Objective: To assess the impact of introducing electronic decision support systems (EDSS)—electronic data entry implemented alongside existing paper-based antenatal care (ANC) records—on the completeness and agreement of ANC records. Design: Two-phase cross-sectional (before and after) substudy of the mobile health integrated model of hypertension, diabetes and ANC (mIRA project) process evaluation. Setting: Four rural districts in Bagmati Province, Nepal, in 19 primary healthcare facilities. Participants: ANC records from pregnant women attending facilities before (n=136) and after (n=138) EDSS implementation. Main outcome measures: For selected indicators in the ANC card and ANC register, we estimated the percentage completeness (any value recorded) and agreement (whether values matched) before and after EDSS implementation. We also reported the completeness of indicators in the EDSS and calculated the agreement between the ANC card and EDSS. χ ² or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate, was used to assess differences in completeness before and after implementation. Results: Completeness of paper-based ANC records was high before implementation (>90%) for all indicators, except tetanus vaccination (15% improvement in the completeness of tetanus vaccination date in paper-based ANC records (77.0%–96.4% for ANC cards and 81.9%–98.9% for ANC register). Agreement between the ANC card and ANC register increased slightly for all indicators after implementation, and the tetanus vaccination date showed the largest increase (38.2%–57.2%). Indicator completeness in the EDSS was low, ranging from 38.2% to 88.7%. Conclusion: We found slight improvements in the completeness and agreement of paper-based ANC records following EDSS implementation. The lower percentage of completeness in the EDSS suggests that any large-scale implementation should consider how to integrate digital and paper-based records to decrease the data entry burden on ANC providers. However, the study’s small sample size limited the ability to examine variation in effects.

Background Understanding implementation fidelity, or adherence to the intervention-as-intended, is essential to interpreting the results of evaluations. In this paper, we propose a longitudinal, explanatory approach to implementation fidelity through a realist evaluation lens. We apply this approach to a mixed-method assessment of implementation fidelity to an electronic decision support system intervention to improve the quality of antenatal care in Nepal. Methods The tablet-based electronic decision support system was implemented in 19 primary care facilities in Nepal. As part of the project’s process evaluation, we used four data sources – monitoring visit checklists and fieldnotes, software backend data, and longitudinal case studies in four facilities – to examine three components of fidelity: use at the point of care, use for all antenatal visits, and quality of data entry. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed thematically using template analysis to examine descriptive findings across the three fidelity components and later to develop and reflect on the causal mechanisms. Findings were synthesised, drawing on Normalization Process Theory, to understand the processes driving the different patterns of fidelity observed. Results Fidelity to point-of-care use declined over time with healthcare providers often entering data after antenatal visits had ended because providers understood the intervention as primarily about recordkeeping rather than decision support. Even in facilities with higher fidelity to point-of-care use, software decision-support prompts were largely ignored. Low antenatal client caseloads and the suggestion by fieldworkers to practice back-entering data from previous antenatal visits undermined understanding of the intervention’s purpose for decision support. Conclusions Our assessment explains how and why patterns of implementation fidelity occurred, yielding more nuanced understanding of the project evaluation’s null result that moves beyond intervention vs implementation failure. Our findings demonstrate the importance of discussing intervention theory in terms fieldworkers and participants understand so as not to undermine fidelity.