Peter Cranston

Dr. Peter Cranston


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

51Years (1976-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 October 2011 in Systematic Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PCPeter Cranston
Peter Cranston
NHNate B. Hardy
Nate B. Hardy
GMGeoffrey E. Morse
Geoffrey E. Morse

31 December 2020 in WIREs Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSonja Jähnig
Sonja Jähnig
VBViktor Baranov
Viktor Baranov
FAFlorian Altermatt
Florian Altermatt
PCPeter Cranston
Peter Cranston
MFMartin Friedrichs‐Manthey
Martin Friedrichs‐Manthey
SDSami Domisch
Sami Domisch
A recent global meta‐analysis reported a decrease in terrestrial but increase in freshwater insect abundance and biomass (van Klink et al., Science 368, p. 417). The authors suggested that water quality has been improving, thereby challenging recent reports documenting drastic global declines in freshwater biodiversity. We raise two major concerns with the meta‐analysis and suggest that these account for the discrepancy with the declines reported elsewhere. First, total abundance and biomass alone are poor indicators of the status of freshwater insect assemblages, and the observed differences may well have been driven by the replacement of sensitive species with tolerant ones. Second, many of the datasets poorly represent global trends and reflect responses to local conditions or nonrandom site selection. We conclude that the results of the meta‐analysis should not be considered indicative of an overall improvement in the condition of freshwater ecosystems.This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness

26 February 2018 in Systematic Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSujatha Narayanan Kutty
Sujatha Narayanan Kutty
WWWing Hing Wong
Wing Hing Wong
KMKaren Meusemann
Karen Meusemann
RMRudolf Meier
Rudolf Meier
PCPeter Cranston
Peter Cranston
Culicomorpha is a particularly species‐rich clade within Diptera (true flies) that comprises c . 10% of the described diversity, including many medically important flies. Morphological studies – even when all life stages are included – yield relationships different from those derived from molecular data, notably with regard to the position of Chironomidae. Congruence amongst molecular studies has been weak due to limitations in gene‐ and family‐level taxon coverage. Here we use a whole‐transcriptome shotgun phylogenomic approach to clarify the relationships among all families of Culicomorpha. The dataset comprised 30 species (27 ingroup) and 364 888 amino acid residues for 1233 single‐copy protein‐encoding genes. Likelihood and parsimony analyses produce robust and highly congruent phylogenetic trees, with only one node in conflict. The superfamily Culicoidea is well supported and comprises Dixidae + [Corethrellidae + (Chaoboridae + Culicidae)]. As suggested previously, Chironomoidea is not monophyletic. The well supported Thaumaleidae + Simuliidae is sister group to Culicoidea, with the weakly supported Chironomidae + Ceratopogonidae probably being the sister group of all remaining Culicomorpha. We used random addition concatenation analysis (RADICAL) and four‐cluster likelihood mapping (FcLM) to assess the strengths of nodal support. The sister‐group relationship between Chironomidae + Ceratopogonidae is consistent with the FcLM results but support for this relationship emerges only when 1150 of the 1233 loci are analysed. We discuss briefly nodes that remain poorly supported even with thousands of genes and mention problems with vouchering in transcriptomic studies.

8 February 2011 in Freshwater Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMatt Krosch
Matt Krosch
ABA. M. Baker
A. M. Baker
PMP. B. Mather
P. B. Mather
PCPeter Cranston
Peter Cranston

12 May 2017 in Invertebrate Systematics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKM. N. Krosch
M. N. Krosch
PCPeter Cranston
Peter Cranston
LBL. M. Bryant
L. M. Bryant
FSF. Strutt
F. Strutt
SMS. R. McCluen
S. R. McCluen
A dated molecular phylogeny is proposed for the Tanypodinae, a diverse subfamily of Chironomidae (Diptera). We used molecular data from fragments of one ribosomal gene (28S), one nuclear protein-coding gene (CAD), and one mitochondrial protein-coding gene (COI), analysed using mixed model Bayesian and maximum likelihood inference methods. All proposed tribes were sampled, namely, Anatopyniini, Clinotanypodini, Coelopyniini, Fittkauimyiini, Macropelopiini, Natarsiini, Pentaneurini, Procladiini and Tanypodini. A multilocus dataset of 1938 characters was compiled from 123 individuals including outgroups. Monophyly was supported for all tribes although some relationships were not robust. Relationships between tribes and some genus groups are highly congruent with a morphology-based estimate. Relationships within tribe Pentaneurini mostly find weak support, yet previously hypothesised groupings and monophyly or lack thereof in well-sampled genera are revealed. The tempo of diversification of the family was deduced by divergence time analysis (BEAST). Origination of a subfamily stem group in the late Jurassic to early Cretaceous was inferred, with all tribes and many genera of Pentaneurini originating and diversifying in the Cretaceous. Some nodes are biogeographically informative. Gene sections supported the backbone, but more extensive sampling is needed to estimate shallower phylogenies and to better understand the tempo and diversification of Tanypodinae.