Sex differences in human social behaviors and abilities have long been a question of public and scientific interest. Females are usually assumed to be more socially oriented and skilful than males. However, despite an extensive literature, the very existence of sex differences remains a matter of discussion while some studies found no sex differences whereas others reported differences that were either congruent or not with gender stereotypes. Moreover, the magnitude, consistency and stability across time of the differences remain an open question, especially during childhood. As play provides an excellent window into children's social development, we investigated whether and how sex differences change in social play across early childhood. Following a cross-sectional design, 164 children aged from 2 to 6 years old, divided into four age groups, were observed during outdoor free play at nursery school. We showed that sex differences are not stable over time evidencing a developmental gap between girls and boys. Social and structured forms of play emerge systematically earlier in girls than in boys leading to subsequent sex differences in favor of girls at some ages, successively in associative play at 3–4 years, cooperative play at 4–5 years, and social interactions with peers at 5–6 years. Preschool boys also display more solitary play than preschool girls, especially when young. Nevertheless, while boys catch up and girls move on towards more complex play, sex differences in social play patterns are reversed in favor of boys at the following ages, such as in associative play at 4–5 years and cooperative play at 5–6 years. This developmental perspective contributes to resolve apparent discrepancies between single-snapshot studies. A better understanding of the dynamics of sex differences in typical social development should also provide insights into atypical social developments which exhibit sex differences in prevalence, such as autism.

Worker sterility is a defining characteristic of eusociality. The existence of the sterile worker caste remains a fundamental question for evolutionary biology as it requires the existence of genes that reduce personal reproduction. Currently, little is known about the proximate mechanisms underpinning worker sterility. Studies into a mutant “anarchistic” strain (in which workers can activate their ovaries) of honey bee, Apis mellifera, identified a list of candidate genes that regulate ovary activation. We quantified the expression of the four most promising candidate genes (Anarchy, Pdk1, S6k, and Ulk3) in nonactivated and activated ovaries of wild-type workers. Ovarian expression of Anarchy, a peroxisomal membrane protein, predicts the ovary state of workers with 88.2% accuracy. Increased expression of Anarchy in the ovary is strongly associated with suppression of oogenesis and its expression is sensitive to the presence of the queen. Therefore, Anarchy satisfies key criteria for a “gene underlying altruism”. When we knocked down expression of Anarchy in the ovary using RNA interference (RNAi) we altered the expression of Buffy, a gene that regulates programmed cell death. Whole-mount multiplex fluorescent in situ hybridization (mFISH) shows Anarchy transcripts localize to degenerating oocytes within the ovary. Our results suggest that Anarchy is involved in the regulation of oogenesis through programmed cell death. The evolution of facultative worker sterility most likely occurred when the conserved mechanism of programmed cell death was co-opted to regulate ovary activation. Anarchy may therefore be the first example of a gene that has evolved through kin selection to regulate worker sterility.