Glenn Newnham

Dr. Glenn Newnham

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 November 2014 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Kim CaldersKim Calders
Kim Calders
GNGlenn Newnham
Glenn Newnham
ABAndrew Burt
Andrew Burt
SMSimon Murphy
Simon Murphy
PRPasi Raumonen
Pasi Raumonen
MKMikko Kaasalainen
Mikko Kaasalainen
Summary: Allometric equations are currently used to estimate above‐ground biomass (AGB) based on the indirect relationship with tree parameters. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) can measure the canopy structure in 3D with high detail. In this study, we develop an approach to estimate AGB from TLS data, which does not need any prior information about allometry. We compare these estimates against destructively harvested AGB estimates and AGB derived from allometric equations. We also evaluate tree parameters, diameter at breast height (DBH) and tree height, estimated from traditional field inventory and TLS data. Tree height, DBH and AGB data are collected through traditional forest inventory, TLS and destructive sampling of 65 trees in a native Eucalypt Open Forest in Victoria, Australia. Single trees are extracted from the TLS data and quantitative structure models are used to estimate the tree volume directly from the point cloud data. AGB is inferred from these volumes and basic density information and is then compared with the estimates derived from allometric equations and destructive sampling. AGB estimates derived from TLS show a high agreement with the reference values from destructive sampling, with a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0·98. The agreement between AGB estimates from allometric equations and the reference is lower (CCC = 0·68–0·78). Our TLS approach shows a total AGB overestimation of 9·68% compared to an underestimation of 36·57–29·85% for the allometric equations. The error for AGB estimates using allometric equations increases exponentially with increasing DBH, whereas the error for AGB estimates from TLS is not dependent on DBH. The TLS method does not rely on indirect relationships with tree parameters or calibration data and shows better agreement with the reference data compared to estimates from allometric equations. Using 3D data also enables us to look at the height distributions of AGB, and we demonstrate that 80% of the AGB at plot level is located in the lower 60% of the trees for a Eucalypt Open Forest. This method can be applied in many forest types and can assist in the calibration and validation of broad‐scale biomass maps.

27 October 2015 in Current Forestry Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GNGlenn Newnham
Glenn Newnham
JAJohn D. Armston
John D. Armston
Kim CaldersKim Calders
Kim Calders
MDMathias Disney
Mathias Disney
JLJenny L. Lovell
Jenny L. Lovell
FDF. Mark Danson
F. Mark Danson
Plot-scale measurements have been the foundation for forest surveys and reporting for over 200 years. Through recent integration with airborne and satellite remote sensing, manual measurements of vegetation structure at the plot scale are now the basis for landscape, continental and international mapping of our forest resources. The use of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) for plot-scale measurement was first demonstrated over a decade ago, with the intimation that these instruments could replace manual measurement methods. This has not yet been the case, despite the unparalleled structural information that TLS can capture. For TLS to reach its full potential, these instruments cannot be viewed as a logical progression of existing plot-based measurement. TLS must be viewed as a disruptive technology that requires a rethink of vegetation surveys and their application across a wide range of disciplines. We review the development of TLS as a plot-scale measurement tool, including the evolution of both instrument hardware and key data processing methodologies. We highlight two broad data modelling approaches of gap probability and geometrical modelling and the basic theory that underpins these. Finally, we discuss the future prospects for increasing the utilisation of TLS for plot-scale forest assessment and forest monitoring.

1 November 2011 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TYTian Yao
Tian Yao
XYXiaoyuan Yang
Xiaoyuan Yang
FZFeng Zhao
Feng Zhao
ZWZhuosen Wang
Zhuosen Wang
Qingling ZhangQingling Zhang
Qingling Zhang
ASAlan Strahler
Alan Strahler

15 June 2010 in Trees
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
THThomas Hilker
Thomas Hilker
MLMartin Van Leeuwen
Martin Van Leeuwen
Nicholas CoopsNicholas Coops
Nicholas Coops
MWMichael Wulder
Michael Wulder
GNGlenn Newnham
Glenn Newnham
DCDarius S. Culvenor
Darius S. Culvenor

1 February 2019 in Environmental Science & Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNeil C. Sims
Neil C. Sims
JEJacqueline R. England
Jacqueline R. England
GNGlenn Newnham
Glenn Newnham
SASasha Alexander
Sasha Alexander
CGCarly Green
Carly Green
AHAlex Held
Alex Held

1 November 2011 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FZFeng Zhao
Feng Zhao
XYXiaoyuan Yang
Xiaoyuan Yang
MSMitchell A. Schull
Mitchell A. Schull
MRMiguel O. Román-Colón
Miguel O. Román-Colón
TYTian Yao
Tian Yao
ASAlan H. Strahler
Alan H. Strahler