María Dolores Tabernero

Dr. María Dolores Tabernero

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2016 in Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPatrícia Domingues
Patrícia Domingues
MGMaría González-Tablas
María González-Tablas
ÁOÁlvaro Otero
Álvaro Otero
DPDaniel Pascual
Daniel Pascual
DMDavid Miranda
David Miranda
MTMaría Dolores Tabernero
María Dolores Tabernero

1 July 2015 in The American Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ICInes Crespo
Ines Crespo
AVAna Louisa Vital
Ana Louisa Vital
MGMaría Gonzalez-Tablas
María Gonzalez-Tablas
MPMaría del Carmen Patino
María del Carmen Patino
AOAlvaro Otero
Alvaro Otero
MTMaría Dolores Tabernero
María Dolores Tabernero

16 February 2014 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PDPatrícia Henriques Domingues
Patrícia Henriques Domingues
PSPablo Sousa
Pablo Sousa
ÁOÁlvaro Otero
Álvaro Otero
Jesús María Hernández-RivasJesús María Hernández-Rivas
Jesús María Hernández-Rivas
LRLaura Ruiz
Laura Ruiz
MTMaría Dolores Tabernero
María Dolores Tabernero
Tumor recurrence remains the major clinical complication of meningiomas, the majority of recurrences occurring among WHO grade I/benign tumors. In the present study, we propose a new scoring system for the prognostic stratification of meningioma patients based on analysis of a large series of meningiomas followed for a median of >5 years. Tumor cytogenetics were systematically investigated by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in 302 meningioma samples, and the proposed classification was further validated in an independent series of cases (n = 132) analyzed by high-density (500K) single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays. Overall, we found an adverse impact on patient relapse-free survival (RFS) for males, presence of brain edema, younger patients (50 mm, tumor localization at intraventricular and anterior cranial base areas, WHO grade II/III meningiomas, and complex karyotypes; the latter 5 variables showed an independent predictive value in multivariate analysis. Based on these parameters, a prognostic score was established for each individual case, and patients were stratified into 4 risk categories with significantly different (P < .001) outcomes. These included a good prognosis group, consisting of approximately 20% of cases, that showed a RFS of 100% ± 0% at 10 years and a very poor-prognosis group with a RFS rate of 0% ± 0% at 10 years. The prognostic impact of the scoring system proposed here was also retained when WHO grade I cases were considered separately (P < .001). Based on this risk-stratification classification, different strategies may be adopted for follow-up, and eventually also for treatment, of meningioma patients at different risks for relapse.

14 December 2020 in Brain Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMaría González‐Tablas Pimenta
María González‐Tablas Pimenta
AOAlvaro Otero-Rodríguez
Alvaro Otero-Rodríguez
DGDaniel Angel Arandia Guzman
Daniel Angel Arandia Guzman
DPDaniel Pascual‐Argente
Daniel Pascual‐Argente
LMLaura Ruíz Martín
Laura Ruíz Martín
MTMaría Dolores Tabernero
María Dolores Tabernero
The distribution and role of tumor‐infiltrating leucocytes in glioblastoma (GBM) remain largely unknown. Here, we investigated the cellular composition of 55 primary (adult) GBM samples by flow cytometry and correlated the tumor immune profile with patient features at diagnosis and outcome. GBM single‐cell suspensions were stained at diagnosis (n = 44) and recurrence following radiotherapy and chemotherapy (n = 11) with a panel of 8‐color monoclonal antibody combinations for the identification and enumeration of (GFAP+CD45−) tumor and normal astrocytic cells, infiltrating myeloid cells —i.e. microglial and blood‐derived tumor‐associated macrophages (TAM), M1‐like, and M2‐like TAM, neutrophils. and myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSC)— and tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) —i.e. CD3+T‐cells and their TCD4+, TCD8+, TCD4−CD8−, and (CD25+CD127lo) regulatory (T‐regs) subsets, (CD19+CD20+) B‐cells, and (CD16+) NK‐cells—. Overall, GBM samples consisted of a major population (mean ± 1SD) of tumor and normal astrocytic cells (73% ± 16%) together with a significant but variable fraction of immune cells (24% ± 18%). Within myeloid cells, TAM predominated (13% ± 12%) including both microglial cells (10% ± 11%) and blood‐derived macrophages (3% ± 5%), in addition to a smaller proportion of neutrophils (5% ± 9%) and MDSC (4% ± 8%). Lymphocytes were less represented and mostly included TCD4+ (0.5% ± 0.7%) and TCD8+ cells (0.6% ± 0.7%), together with lower numbers of TCD4−CD8− T‐cells (0.2% ± 0.4%), T‐regs (0.1% ± 0.2%), B‐lymphocytes (0.1% ± 0.2%) and NK‐cells (0.05% ± 0.05%). Overall, three distinct immune profiles were identified: cases with a minor fraction of leucocytes, tumors with a predominance of TAM and neutrophils, and cases with mixed infiltration by TAM, neutrophils, and T‐lymphocytes. Untreated GBM patients with mixed myeloid and lymphoid immune infiltrates showed a significantly shorter patient overall survival versus the other two groups, in the absence of gains of the EGFR gene (p = 0.02). Here we show that immune cell infiltrates are systematically present in GBM, with highly variable levels and immune profiles. Patients with mixed myeloid and T‐lymphoid infiltrates showed a worse outcome.

19 April 2015 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PDPatrícia Domingues
Patrícia Domingues
MGMaría González-Tablas
María González-Tablas
ÁOÁlvaro Otero
Álvaro Otero
DPDaniel Pascual
Daniel Pascual
LRLaura Ruiz
Laura Ruiz
MTMaría Dolores Tabernero
María Dolores Tabernero
Meningiomas are usually considered to be benign central nervous system tumors; however, they show heterogenous clinical, histolopathological and cytogenetic features associated with a variable outcome. In recent years important advances have been achieved in the identification of the genetic/molecular alterations of meningiomas and the signaling pathways involved. Thus, monosomy 22, which is often associated with mutations of the NF2 gene, has emerged as the most frequent alteration of meningiomas; in addition, several other genes (e.g. AKT1, KLF4, TRAF7, SMO) and chromosomes have been found to be recurrently altered often in association with more complex karyotypes and involvement of multiple signaling pathways. Here we review the current knowledge about the most relevant genes involved and the signaling pathways targeted by such alterations. In addition, we summarize those proposals that have been made so far for classification and prognostic stratification of meningiomas based on their genetic/genomic features.

30 November 2011 in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ICInês Crespo
Inês Crespo
AVAna Luísa Vital
Ana Luísa Vital
ANAna Belén Nieto-Librero
Ana Belén Nieto-Librero
OROlinda Rebelo
Olinda Rebelo
HTHermínio Tão
Hermínio Tão
MTMaría Dolores Tabernero
María Dolores Tabernero