Sepsis is one of the most important causes of death in intensive care units. Despite the fact that sepsis pathogenesis remains obscure, there is increasing evidence that oxidants and antioxidants play a key role. The imbalance of the abovementioned substances in favor of oxidants is called oxidative stress, and it contributes to sepsis process. The most important consequences are vascular permeability impairment, decreased cardiac performance, and mitochondrial malfunction leading to impaired respiration. Nitric oxide is perhaps the most important and well‐studied oxidant. Selenium, vitamin C, and 3N‐acetylcysteine among others are potential therapies for the restoration of redox balance in sepsis. Results from recent studies are promising, but there is a need for more human studies in a clinical setting for safety and efficiency evaluation.

Data on the effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients are limited. The present retrospective observational cohort study, which was conducted in two general intensive care units (ICUs) in central Greece, compared critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients suffering from carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections receiving CAZ-AVI to patients who received appropriate available antibiotic therapy.

Cardiac dysfunction may complicate the course of severe sepsis and septic shock with significant implications for patient’s survival. The basic pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to septic cardiomyopathy have not been fully clarified until now. Disease‐specific treatment is lacking, and care is still based on supportive modalities. Septic state causes destruction of redox balance in many cell types, cardiomyocytes included. The production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species is increased, and natural antioxidant systems fail to counterbalance the overwhelming generation of free radicals. Reactive species interfere with many basic cell functions, mainly through destruction of protein, lipid, and nucleic acid integrity, compromising enzyme function, mitochondrial structure and performance, and intracellular signaling, all leading to cardiac contractile failure. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy may result from oxidative imbalance. This review will address the multiple aspects of cardiomyocyte bioenergetic failure in sepsis and discuss potential therapeutic interventions.

Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response syndrome of suspected or confirmed infectious origin, which frequently culminates in multiorgan failure, including cardiac involvement. Septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) remains a poorly defined clinical entity, lacking a formal or consensus definition and representing a significant knowledge gap in critical care medicine. It is an often-underdiagnosed complication of sepsis. The only widely accepted aspect of its definition is that SCM is a transient myocardial dysfunction occurring in patients with sepsis, which cannot be attributed to ischemia or pre-existing cardiac disease. The pathogenesis of SCM appears to be multifactorial, involving inflammatory cytokines, overproduction of nitric oxide, mitochondrial dysfunction, calcium homeostasis dysregulation, autonomic imbalance, and myocardial edema. Diagnosis primarily relies on echocardiography, with advanced tools such as tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) providing greater sensitivity for detecting subclinical dysfunction and guiding therapeutic decisions. Traditional echocardiographic findings, such as left ventricular ejection fraction measured by 2D echocardiography, often reflect systemic vasoplegia rather than intrinsic myocardial dysfunction, complicating accurate diagnosis. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, identified as a critical component of SCM in many studies, has multifactorial pathophysiology. Factors including septic cardiomyopathy itself, mechanical ventilation, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia—particularly in cases complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)—increase RV afterload and exacerbate RV dysfunction. The prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers, such as troponins and natriuretic peptides, remains uncertain, as these markers primarily reflect illness severity rather than being specific to SCM. Treatment focuses on the early recognition of sepsis, hemodynamic optimization, and etiological interventions, as no targeted therapies currently exist. Emerging therapies, such as levosimendan and VA-ECMO, show potential in severe SCM cases, though further validation is needed. The lack of standardized diagnostic criteria, combined with the heterogeneity of sepsis presentations, poses significant challenges to the effective management of SCM. Future research should focus on developing cluster-based classification systems for septic shock patients by integrating biomarkers, echocardiographic findings, and clinical parameters. These advancements could clarify the underlying pathophysiology and enable tailored therapeutic strategies to improve outcomes for SCM patients.