The perfusion index (PI) is an objective tool used to assess a successful nerve block. Epinephrine is a widely used adjuvant to local anesthetics, and it may affect PI values because of the vasoconstrictive property. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of epinephrine on PI as an indicator of a successful block in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCBPB). In this randomized controlled trial, 82 adult patients underwent upper limb surgery under SCBPB were recruited between July 2018 and March 2019 in a single tertiary care center. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: non-epinephrine group (n = 41) or epinephrine group (5 mcg ml⁻¹, n = 41). The primary outcome was the comparison of the “PI ratio 10,” which was defined as the ratio of the PI 10 to the baseline. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the accuracy of the PI in predicting the block success at each time interval. The PI ratio 10 was 2.7 (1.9–4.0) in non-epinephrine group and 3.3 (2.2–4.4) in epinephrine group (median difference: 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] − 1.1 to 0.2; P = 0.207). The ROC curves compared without group identification were not significantly different over time. The cut-off value for the PI and PI ratio at 5 min (PI ratio 5) were 7.7 (area under the ROC [AUROC]: 0.89, 95% CI 0.83–0.94) and 1.6 (AUROC: 0.94, 95% CI 0.90–0.98), respectively. The perineural epinephrine did not affect the PI following a SCBPB. The PI ratio 5 > 1.6 might be considered as a relatively accurate predictor of a successful SCBPB.Trial registration: This study was registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea (https://cris.nih.go.kr. CriS No. KCT0003006).

Background: Dexmedetomidine is widely used for conscious sedation in patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery under regional anesthesia. We evaluated the postoperative analgesic effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine given during ankle surgery under spinal anesthesia. Methods: Forty-three participants underwent repair of lateral angle ligaments under spinal anesthesia. For sedation during surgery, participants were allocated to a dexmedetomidine group (n=22) that received a loading dose of 1 mcg.kg^−1, over 10 min, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.2–0.7 μg.kg^−1,.h^−1,; and a propofol group (n=21) that received an effective site concentration of 0.5–2.0 μg.mL^−1, via target-controlled infusion. The primary outcome was the postoperative, cumulative, intravenous (IV) morphine equivalent dose delivered via IV patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA) and rescue analgesic consumption in the first 24 h after surgery. We recorded sensory and motor block durations. Results: The postoperative IV morphine equivalent dose was 14.5 mg (0.75–31.75 mg) in the dexmedetomidine group compared to 48.0 mg (31.5–92.5 mg) in the propofol group (median difference, 33.2 mg; 95% confidence interval, 21.0–54.8 mg; P<0.001). The time to the first complaint of surgical site pain was significantly prolonged in the dexmedetomidine group (P<0.001), but the duration of motor block was comparable between the two groups (P=0.55). Conclusion: IV dexmedetomidine given as a sedative during ankle surgery under spinal anesthesia reduced postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 h. Thus, intraoperative dexmedetomidine is a versatile sedative adjunct. Level of evidence: Level I, prospective randomized trial.

The degree of neuromuscular blockade reversal may affect bispectral index (BIS) value. One possible reason is that the reverse of neuromuscular blockade affects electromyographic (EMG) signals of fascial muscle. Another reason is, the afferentation theory, the reverse of neuromuscular blockade relieves block signals generated in muscle stretch receptors from accessing the brain through afferent nerve pathways and induces arousal. Inaccurate BIS value may lead to overdose of drugs or the risk of intraoperative awareness. We compared changes in BIS and EMG values according to neuromuscular blockade reversal agents under steady-state desflurane anesthesia. A total of 65 patients were randomly allocated to receive either neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg, sugammadex 4 mg/kg, or pyridostigmine 0.25 mg/kg for neuromuscular blockade reversal under stable desflurane anesthesia, and 57 patients completed the study. The primary outcome was change in BIS and EMG values before and after administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents (between train-of-four [TOF] count 1–2 and TOF ratio 0.9). The change in BIS and EMG values before and after administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents were statistically different in each group (BIS: Neostigmine group, P < 0.001; Sugammadex group, P < 0.001; Pyridostigmine group, P = 0.001; EMG: Neostigmine group, P = 0.001; Sugammadex group, P < 0.001; Pyridostigmine group, P = 0.001; respectively). The BIS and EMG values had a positive correlation (P < 0.001). Our results demonstrate that the EMG and BIS values have increased after neuromuscular blockade reversal under desflurane anesthesia regardless of the type of neuromuscular blockade reversal agent. BIS should be applied carefully to measure of depth of anesthesia after neuromuscular blockade reversal.