Jun-Cheng Weng

Dr. Jun-Cheng Weng

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2020 in Cancer Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KCKai-Fu Chang
Kai-Fu Chang
XHXiao-Fan Huang
Xiao-Fan Huang
JCJinghua Tsai Chang
Jinghua Tsai Chang
YHYa-Chih Huang
Ya-Chih Huang
JWJun-Cheng Weng
Jun-Cheng Weng
NTNu-Man Tsai
Nu-Man Tsai
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor with great invasiveness and resistance to chemotherapy, which presents a treatment challenge. In this study, we investigated the antitumor effect of Cedrol, a sesquiterpene alcohol isolated from Cedrus atlantica, against GBM cells in vitro and in vivo. Cedrol was found to potently inhibit cell growth and induce intracellular ROS generation and DNA damage response. In addition, Cedrol induced significant G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis via the extrinsic (Fas/FasL/Caspase-8) and intrinsic (Bax/Bcl-2/Caspase-9) pathways. In addition, Cedrol had a synergistic effect with temozolomide (TMZ) and reduced drug resistance by blockage of the AKT/mTOR pathway. Cedrol suppressed tumor growth in both orthotopic and xenograft GBM animal models with low or no short-term acute toxicity or long-term accumulative toxicity. In a molecular docking study, Cedrol targeted the androgen receptor (AR), and reduced DHT-mediated AR nuclear translocation, downstream gene KLK3/TMPRSS2 expression and cell proliferation. Our study demonstrates that Cedrol may be a potential candidate for drug development for single or combination treatment with TMZ in GBM therapy.

1 January 2018 in Behavioural Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSeh-Huang Chao
Seh-Huang Chao
YLYin-To Liao
Yin-To Liao
VCVincent Chin-Hung Chen
Vincent Chin-Hung Chen
CLCheng-Jui Li
Cheng-Jui Li
RMRoger S. McIntyre
Roger S. McIntyre
JWJun-Cheng Weng
Jun-Cheng Weng

1 January 2017 in NeuroImage: Clinical
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YTYeu-Sheng Tyan
Yeu-Sheng Tyan
JLJan-Ray Liao
Jan-Ray Liao
CSChao-Yu Shen
Chao-Yu Shen
YLYu-Chieh Lin
Yu-Chieh Lin
JWJun-Cheng Weng
Jun-Cheng Weng
The question of whether there are biological differences between male and female brains is a fraught one, and political positions and prior expectations seem to have a strong influence on the interpretation of scientific data in this field. This question is relevant to issues of gender differences in the prevalence of psychiatric conditions, including autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Tourette's syndrome, schizophrenia, dyslexia, depression, and eating disorders. Understanding how gender influences vulnerability to these conditions is significant. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) provides a non-invasive method to investigate brain microstructure and the integrity of anatomical connectivity. Generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI) has been proposed to characterize complicated fiber patterns and distinguish fiber orientations, providing an opportunity for more accurate, higher-order descriptions through the water diffusion process. Therefore, we aimed to investigate differences in the brain's structural network between teenage males and females using GQI. This study included 59 (i.e., 33 males and 26 females) age- and education-matched subjects (age range: 13 to 14 years). The structural connectome was obtained by graph theoretical and network-based statistical (NBS) analyses. Our findings show that teenage male brains exhibit better intrahemispheric communication, and teenage female brains exhibit better interhemispheric communication. Our results also suggest that the network organization of teenage male brains is more local, more segregated, and more similar to small-world networks than teenage female brains. We conclude that the use of an MRI study with a GQI-based structural connectomic approach like ours presents novel insights into network-based systems of the brain and provides a new piece of the puzzle regarding gender differences.

1 November 2016 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VCVincent Chin-Hung Chen
Vincent Chin-Hung Chen
CSChao-Yu Shen
Chao-Yu Shen
SLSophie Hsin-Yi Liang
Sophie Hsin-Yi Liang
ZLZhen-Hui Li
Zhen-Hui Li
YTYeu-Sheng Tyan
Yeu-Sheng Tyan
JWJun-Cheng Weng
Jun-Cheng Weng

29 February 2020 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJun-Cheng Weng
Jun-Cheng Weng
TLTung-Yeh Lin
Tung-Yeh Lin
YTYuan-Hsiung Tsai
Yuan-Hsiung Tsai
MCMan Teng Cheok
Man Teng Cheok
YCYi-Peng Eve Chang
Yi-Peng Eve Chang
VCVincent Chin-Hung Chen
Vincent Chin-Hung Chen
It is estimated that at least one million people die by suicide every year, showing the importance of suicide prevention and detection. In this study, an autoencoder and machine learning model was employed to predict people with suicidal ideation based on their structural brain imaging. The subjects in our generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI) dataset consisted of three groups: 41 depressive patients with suicidal ideation (SI), 54 depressive patients without suicidal thoughts (NS), and 58 healthy controls (HC). In the GQI dataset, indices of generalized fractional anisotropy (GFA), isotropic values of the orientation distribution function (ISO), and normalized quantitative anisotropy (NQA) were separately trained in different machine learning models. A convolutional neural network (CNN)-based autoencoder model, the supervised machine learning algorithm extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and logistic regression (LR) were used to discriminate SI subjects from NS and HC subjects. After five-fold cross validation, separate data were tested to obtain the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of each result. Our results showed that the best pattern of structure across multiple brain locations can classify suicidal ideates from NS and HC with a prediction accuracy of 85%, a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 75%. The algorithms developed here might provide an objective tool to help identify suicidal ideation risk among depressed patients alongside clinical assessment.

4 May 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VCVincent Chin-Hung Chen
Vincent Chin-Hung Chen
KLKai-Yi Lin
Kai-Yi Lin
YTYuan-Hsiung Tsai
Yuan-Hsiung Tsai
JWJun-Cheng Weng
Jun-Cheng Weng
Treatment modalities for breast cancer, the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide, include surgery, radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and hormonal therapy. The advancement in medical technology has facilitated substantial reduction in breast cancer mortality. However, patients may experience cognitive impairment after chemotherapy. This phenomenon called chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (i.e., “chemobrain”) is common among breast cancer survivors. However, cognitive function deficits may exist before chemotherapy initiation. This study examined the functional network alterations in breast survivors by using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We recruited 172 female participants and separated them into three groups: C+ (57 breast cancer survivors who had finished 3–12-month-long chemotherapy), C- (45 breast cancer survivors who had not undergone chemotherapy), and HC (70 participants with no breast cancer history). We analyzed mean fractional amplitudes of low-frequency fluctuation and graph theoretical topologies from resting-state fMRI and applied network-based analysis to portray functional changes among the three groups. Among the three groups, the C- group demonstrated hyperactivity in the prefrontal cortex, bilateral middle temporal gyrus, right inferior temporal gyrus and right angular gyrus. Only the left caudate demonstrated significantly more hypoactivity in the C- group than in the C+ group. Graph theoretical analysis demonstrated that the brains of the C+ group became inclined toward regular networks and the brains of the C- group became inclined toward random networks. Subtle alterations were noted in the brain activity and networks of our cancer survivors. Moreover, functional network disruptions occurred regardless of chemotherapeutic agent administration.