Igor A. Zolotukhin

Prof. Dr. Igor A. Zolotukhin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2017 in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IZIgor A. Zolotukhin
Igor A. Zolotukhin
ESEvgeny I. Seliverstov
Evgeny I. Seliverstov
YSYuri N. Shevtsov
Yuri N. Shevtsov
IAIlona P. Avakiants
Ilona P. Avakiants
ANAleksey S. Nikishkov
Aleksey S. Nikishkov
AKAlexander I. Kirienko
Alexander I. Kirienko

23 April 2023 in Journal of Venous Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESE.I. Seliverstov
E.I. Seliverstov
KLK.V. Lobastov
K.V. Lobastov
EIE.A. Ilyukhin
E.A. Ilyukhin
TAT.V. Apkhanova
T.V. Apkhanova
RAR.V. Akhmetzyanov
R.V. Akhmetzyanov
ISI.A. Suchkov
I.A. Suchkov
The guidelines are developed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation by the all-Russian public organization «Association of Phlebologists of Russia» with participation of the Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia, the Russian Society of Surgeons, the Russian Society of Angiologists and Vascular Surgeons, the Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedists of Russia, the Association of Oncologists of Russia, the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology, Russian Society of Oncohematologists, Russian Society of Cardiology, Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

14 May 2019 in Hernia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASA. Sazhin
A. Sazhin
IZIgor A. Zolotukhin
Igor A. Zolotukhin
ESE. Seliverstov
E. Seliverstov
ANA. Nikishkov
A. Nikishkov
YSY. Shevtsov
Y. Shevtsov
AKA. Kirienko
A. Kirienko

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKsenia Butova
Ksenia Butova
SSSergey Shayakhmetov
Sergey Shayakhmetov
MFMaxim Fedin
Maxim Fedin
IZIgor A. Zolotukhin
Igor A. Zolotukhin
SGSergio Gianesini
Sergio Gianesini
Consultation prioritization is fundamental in optimal healthcare management and its performance can be helped by artificial intelligence (AI)-dedicated software and by digital medicine in general. The need for remote consultation has been demonstrated not only in the pandemic-induced lock-down but also in rurality conditions for which access to health centers is constantly limited. The term “AI” indicates the use of a computer to simulate human intellectual behavior with minimal human intervention. AI is based on a “machine learning” process or on an artificial neural network. AI provides accurate diagnostic algorithms and personalized treatments in many fields, including oncology, ophthalmology, traumatology, and dermatology. AI can help vascular specialists in diagnostics of peripheral artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and deep vein thrombosis by analyzing contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound data and in diagnostics of pulmonary embolism on multi-slice computed angiograms. Automatic methods based on AI may be applied to detect the presence and determine the clinical class of chronic venous disease. Nevertheless, data on using AI in this field are still scarce. In this narrative review, the authors discuss available data on AI implementation in arterial and venous disease diagnostics and care.

2 August 2018 in Epigenomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMariya A. Smetanina
Mariya A. Smetanina
AKAlexander E Kel
Alexander E Kel
KSKsenia S Sevost’iAnova
Ksenia S Sevost’iAnova
IMIgor V Maiborodin
Igor V Maiborodin
ASAndrey I Shevela
Andrey I Shevela
MFMaxim L Filipenko
Maxim L Filipenko
Aim: To integrate transcriptomic and DNA-methylomic measurements on varicose versus normal veins using a systems biological analysis to shed light on the interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors. Materials & methods: Differential expression and methylation were measured using microarrays, supported by real-time quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry confirmation for relevant gene products. A systems biological ‘upstream analysis’ was further applied. Results: We identified several potential key players contributing to extracellular matrix remodeling in varicose veins. Specifically, our analysis suggests MFAP5 acting as a master regulator, upstream of integrins, of the cellular network affecting the varicose vein condition. Possible mechanism and pathogenic model were outlined. Conclusion: A coherent model proposed incorporates the relevant signaling networks and will hopefully aid further studies on varicose vein pathogenesis.

19 October 2016 in Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IZIgor A. Zolotukhin
Igor A. Zolotukhin
ESEvgeny I Seliverstov
Evgeny I Seliverstov
EZElena A Zakharova
Elena A Zakharova
AKAlexander I Kirienko
Alexander I Kirienko
Objective: To establish an effect of isolated phlebectomy in patients with incompetent great saphenous vein (Ambulatory Selective Varices Ablation under Local anesthesia (ASVAL) procedure) on the reflux and diameter of the trunk and to assess recurrence rate of varicose veins at one year. Material and methods: We conducted a prospective study on patients with primary varicose veins and with C2 or C2,3 or C2,3,4 or C2,4 classes of chronic venous disease and great saphenous vein incompetence. The study included 67 patients (51 women and 16 men; 75 limbs in total). Age varied from 17 to 71 years; mean age was 46.8 years (SD 13.9). We recorded the presence or absence of reflux in the great saphenous vein with duplex ultrasound before and after surgery. The recurrence of varicose veins was evaluated at 12 months. All the patients underwent isolated phlebectomy with preservation of incompetent great saphenous vein (ASVAL procedure) under local anesthesia. Results: At one year after removing of tributaries of the incompetent trunk, 66% of them were competent. Reflux persisted in 17% of great saphenous veins with reflux above mid-thigh and in 61% of trunks with reflux extended below the mid-thigh (p = 0.0004). The diameter of all the veins decreased significantly no matter reflux disappeared or not. Varicose veins reoccurred in 13.5% cases. In 6.5% of limbs with a reflux above the mid-thigh, the recurrence was registered at one year, while in the limbs with the reflux below the mid-thigh at a baseline, the recurrence rate was 25% (p = 0.036). Conclusion: Isolated phlebectomy with a preservation of incompetent great saphenous vein leads to disappearance of reflux in a majority of cases and to significant decrease of vein diameter in all the cases. ASVAL procedure could be considered as a less aggressive and less expensive approach in selected cases. Clear indications for isolated phlebectomy need to be established.