Alexandru G. Bardas

Dr. Alexandru G. Bardas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 July 2020 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YDYousif Dafalla
Yousif Dafalla
Bo LiuBo Liu
Bo Liu
DHDalton A. Hahn
Dalton A. Hahn
Hongyu WuHongyu Wu
Hongyu Wu
RAReza Ahmadi
Reza Ahmadi
ABAlexandru G. Bardas
Alexandru G. Bardas
Nanogrids are customer deployments that can generate and inject electricity into the power grid. These deployments are based on behind-the-meter renewable energy resources and are labeled as “prosumer setups”, allowing customers to not only consume electricity, but also produce it. A residential nanogrid is comprised of a physical layer that is a household-scale electric power system, and a cyber layer that is used by manufacturers and/or grid operators to remotely monitor and control the nanogrid. With the increased penetration of renewable energy resources, nanogrids are at the forefront of a paradigm shift in the operational landscape and their correct operation is vital to the electric power grid. In this paper, we perform a cybersecurity assessment of a state-of-the art residential nanogrid deployment. For this purpose, we deployed a real-world experimental nanogrid setup that is based on photovoltaic (PV) generation. We analyzed the security and the resiliency of this system at both the cyber and physical layers. While we noticed improvements in the cybersecurity measures employed in the current nanogrid compared to previous generations, there are still major concerns. Our experiments show that these concerns range from exploiting well-known protocols, such as Secure Shell (SSH) and Domain Name Service (DNS), to the leakage of confidential information, and major shortcomings in the software updating mechanism. While the compromise of multiple nanogrids can have a negative effect on the entire power grid, we focus our analysis on individual households and have determined through Simulink-based simulations the economic loss of a compromised deployment.

12 August 2017
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
ABAlexandru G. Bardas
Alexandru G. Bardas
SSSathya Chandran Sundaramurthy
Sathya Chandran Sundaramurthy
XOXinming Ou
Xinming Ou
SDScott A. DeLoach
Scott A. DeLoach

21 December 2021 in IEEE Security & Privacy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAlaa Daffalla
Alaa Daffalla
LSLucy Simko
Lucy Simko
TKTadayoshi Kohno
Tadayoshi Kohno
ABAlexandru G. Bardas
Alexandru G. Bardas

11 August 2023
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
ADAlaa Daffalla
Alaa Daffalla
ABAlexandru G. Bardas
Alexandru G. Bardas

21 October 2020 in arXiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
DHDalton A. Hahn
Dalton A. Hahn
DDDrew Davidson
Drew Davidson
ABAlexandru G. Bardas
Alexandru G. Bardas
Service meshes have emerged as an attractive DevOps solution for collecting, managing, and coordinating microservice deployments. However, current service meshes leave fundamental security mechanisms missing or incomplete. The security burden means service meshes may actually cause additional workload and overhead for administrators over traditional monolithic systems. By assessing the effectiveness and practicality of service mesh tools, this work provides necessary insights into the available security of service meshes. We evaluate service meshes from two perspectives: skilled system administrators (who deploy optimal configurations of available security mechanisms) and default configurations. Under these two models, we consider a comprehensive set of adversarial scenarios and uncover important design flaws with contradicting goals, as well as the limitations and challenges encountered in employing service mesh tools for operational environments.