Thomas Pregger

Dr. Thomas Pregger

German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems (formerly Institute of Engineering Thermodynamics), Department Energy Systems Analysis, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2017 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJan Michalski
Jan Michalski
UBUlrich Bünger
Ulrich Bünger
FCFritz Crotogino
Fritz Crotogino
SDSabine Donadei
Sabine Donadei
GSGregor-Sönke Schneider
Gregor-Sönke Schneider
DHDominik Heide
Dominik Heide

1 March 2017 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HGHans Christian Gils
Hans Christian Gils
YSYvonne Scholz
Yvonne Scholz
TPThomas Pregger
Thomas Pregger
DTDiego Luca de Tena
Diego Luca de Tena
DHDominik Heide
Dominik Heide
Variable renewable energy (VRE) resources increasingly add fluctuations to power systems. The required types and capacities of balancing measures, amounts of curtailment, and costs associated with system integration need to be assessed for advising policy makers and economic actors. Previous studies mostly exclude storage from model-endogenous capacity expansion and omit concentrated solar power (CSP) completely. In this study, we stress the need for grid and backup capacity by investigating an integrated market in Europe, allowing for additional short-term as well as long-term storage and considering CSP as a dispatchable backup option. The Renewable Energy Mix (REMix) energy system model is introduced and applied to assess the capacity expansion and hourly dispatch at various levels of photovoltaic and wind power penetration. The model results demonstrate combinations of spatial and temporal balancing measures that enable net photovoltaic and wind supply shares of 60% and 70% of the annual demand, respectively. The usage of storage and grid can keep curtailments below 20% of the demand for theoretical VRE shares of up to 100%. Furthermore, we determine that the VRE supply structure has a strong impact on the least-cost allocation of power plants across Europe but only a limited effect on supply costs

1 December 2007 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EPElisabeth G. Pacyna
Elisabeth G. Pacyna
JPJozef M. Pacyna
Jozef M. Pacyna
JFJanina Fudala
Janina Fudala
ESEwa Strzelecka-Jastrzab
Ewa Strzelecka-Jastrzab
SHStanislaw Hlawiczka
Stanislaw Hlawiczka
RFRainer Friedrich
Rainer Friedrich

1 May 2009 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TPThomas Pregger
Thomas Pregger
DGDaniela Graf
Daniela Graf
WKWolfram Krewitt
Wolfram Krewitt
CSChristian Sattler
Christian Sattler
MRMartin Roeb
Martin Roeb
SMStephan Möller
Stephan Möller

1 August 2013 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TPThomas Pregger
Thomas Pregger
JNJoachim Nitsch
Joachim Nitsch
TNTobias Naegler
Tobias Naegler

12 July 2011 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPP. Peylin
P. Peylin
SHSander Houwelling
Sander Houwelling
MKM.C. (Maarten) Krol
M.C. (Maarten) Krol
UKU. Karstens
U. Karstens
CRC. Rödenbeck
C. Rödenbeck
MHMartin Heimann
Martin Heimann
Inverse modeling techniques used to quantify surface carbon fluxes commonly assume that the uncertainty of fossil fuel CO2 (FFCO2) emissions is negligible and that intra-annual variations can be neglected. To investigate these assumptions, we analyzed the differences between four fossil fuel emission inventories with spatial and temporal differences over Europe and their impact on the model simulated CO2 concentration. Large temporal flux variations characterize the hourly fields (~40 % and ~80 % for the seasonal and diurnal cycles, peak-to-peak) and annual country totals differ by 10 % on average and up to 40 % for some countries (i.e., the Netherlands). These emissions have been prescribed to seven different transport models, resulting in 28 different FFCO2 concentrations fields. The modeled FFCO2 concentration time series at surface sites using time-varying emissions show larger seasonal cycles (+2 ppm at the Hungarian tall tower (HUN)) and smaller diurnal cycles in summer (−1 ppm at HUN) than when using constant emissions. The concentration range spanned by all simulations varies between stations, and is generally larger in winter (up to ~10 ppm peak-to-peak at HUN) than in summer (~5 ppm). The contribution of transport model differences to the simulated concentration std-dev is 2–3 times larger than the contribution of emission differences only, at typical European sites used in global inversions. These contributions to the hourly (monthly) std-dev's amount to ~1.2 (0.8) ppm and ~0.4 (0.3) ppm for transport and emissions, respectively. First comparisons of the modeled concentrations with 14C-based fossil fuel CO2 observations show that the large transport differences still hamper a quantitative evaluation/validation of the emission inventories. Changes in the estimated monthly biosphere flux (Fbio) over Europe, using two inverse modeling approaches, are relatively small (less that 5 %) while changes in annual Fbio (up to ~0.15 % GtC yr−1) are only slightly smaller than the differences in annual emission totals and around 30 % of the mean European ecosystem carbon sink. These results point to an urgent need to improve not only the transport models but also the assumed spatial and temporal distribution of fossil fuel emission inventories.