Chitinases, enzymes that cleave chitin’s chain to low molecular weight chitooligomers, are widely distributed in nature. Mammalian chitinases belong to the 18-glycosyl-hydrolase family and can be divided into two groups: true chitinases with enzymatic activity (AMCase and chitotriosidase) and chitinase-like proteins (CLPs) molecules which can bind to chitin or chitooligosaccharides but lack enzymatic activity (eg, YKL-40). Chitinases are thought to be part of an innate immunity against chitin-containing parasites and fungal infections. Both groups of these hydrolases are lately evaluated also as chemical mediators or biomarkers involved in airway inflammation and fibrosis. The aim of this article is to present the current knowledge on the potential role of human chitinases and CLPs in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and course of obstructive lung diseases. We also assessed the potential role of chitinase and CLPs inhibitors as therapeutic targets in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.

Background. The cross-talk between the external and internal environment in the respiratory tract involves macrophage/dendritic cell (DC) transepithelial network. Epithelium triggers dendritic cell-mediated inflammation by producing thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), IL-33, and IL-17A. The study aimed to evaluate the expression of TSLP, IL-33, and IL-17A in human monocyte derived dendritic cells (moDCs) co-cultured with respiratory epithelium and monocyte derived macrophages (moMφs) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and healthy controls. Methods. The study used a triple-cell co-culture model, utilizing nasal epithelial cells, along with moMφs and moDCs. Cells were cultured in mono-, di-, and triple-co-cultures for 24 h. Results. Co-culture with epithelium and moMφs significantly increased TSLP in asthma and did not change IL-33 and IL-17A mRNA expression in moDCs. moDCs from asthmatics were characterized by the highest TSLP mRNA expression and the richest population of TSLPR, ST2, and IL17RA expressed cells. A high number of positive correlations between the assessed cytokines and CHI3L1, IL-12p40, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF in moDCs was observed in asthma and COPD. Conclusion. TSLP, IL-33, and IL-17A expression in moDCs are differently regulated by epithelium in asthma, COPD, and healthy subjects. These complex cell–cell interactions may impact airway inflammation and be an important factor in the pathobiology of asthma and COPD.

The recommendations were developed as answers to previously formulated questions concerning everyday diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. They were developed based on a review of the current literature using the GRADE methodology. The experts suggest that PF-ILD be diagnosed based on a combination of different criteria, such as the aggravation of symptoms, progression of radiological lesions, and worsening of lung function test parameters. The experts recommend a precise diagnosis of an underlying disease, with serological testing for an autoimmune disease always being included. The final diagnosis should be worked out by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Patients with an interstitial lung disease other than IPF who do not meet the criteria for the progressive fibrosis phenotype should be monitored for progression, and those with systemic autoimmune diseases should be regularly monitored for signs of interstitial lung disease. In managing patients with interstitial lung disease associated with autoimmune diseases, an opinion of an MDT should be considered. Nintedanib rather than pirfenidon should be introduced in the event of the ineffectiveness of the therapy recommended for the treatment of the underlying disease, but in some instances, it is possible to start antifibrotic treatment without earlier immunomodulatory therapy. It is also admissible to use immunomodulatory and antifibrotic drugs simultaneously. No recommendations were made for or against termination of anti-fibrotic therapy in the case of noted progression during treatment of a PF-ILD other than IPF. The experts recommend that the same principles of non-pharmacological and palliative treatment and eligibility for lung transplantation should be applied to patients with an interstitial lung disease other than IPF with progressive fibrosis as in patients with IPF.

Blood eosinophilia has been proposed as a surrogate marker for airway eosinophilia and as a predictor of treatment response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between blood and sputum eosinophils and to investigate the association between blood and sputum eosinophil count and clinical features of mild-to-moderate COPD. We performed a retrospective analysis of blood and sputum eosinophil count, as well as demographic and lung function data in a cohort of 90 stable, steroid-naive (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 1 or 2) COPD patients and 20 control subjects. Blood and sputum eosinophil count did not correlate both in patients with COPD (r = –0.04 p = 0.705) and in controls (r = 0.05, p = 0.838). Sputum eosinophilia (≥3%) was present in 40% of COPD patients. The median blood eosinophil count in patients with COPD was 180 (interquartile range 90–270)/μL; patients with low blood eosinophils (<180/μL) did not differ from those with high blood eosinophils (≥180/μL) in terms of forced expiratory volume in 1 second, bronchial reversibility or hyperresponsiveness. This was also the case when COPD patients with and without sputum eosinophilia were compared. At the same time, positive bronchial reversibility and positive bronchial hyperresponsiveness were observed in 2 (11%) COPD patients with high blood eosinophils and in 1 (5%) patient with sputum eosinophilia. There was a weak, albeit significant correlation (r = 0.22 p = 0.041) between blood eosinophil count and age in patients with COPD. Peripheral eosinophil count poorly reflects sputum eosinophils and lung function in stable steroid-naive mild-to-moderate COPD patients.