Mikhail Ovchinnikov

Dr. Mikhail Ovchinnikov


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 November 2009 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JFJiwen Fan
Jiwen Fan
TYTianle Yuan
Tianle Yuan
JCJennifer M. Comstock
Jennifer M. Comstock
SGSteven Ghan
Steven Ghan
AKAlexander Khain
Alexander Khain
MOMikhail Ovchinnikov
Mikhail Ovchinnikov

1 February 2011 in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GMGreg M. McFarquhar
Greg M. McFarquhar
SGSteven Ghan
Steven Ghan
JVJohannes Verlinde
Johannes Verlinde
AKAlexei Korolev
Alexei Korolev
JSJ. Walter Strapp
J. Walter Strapp
AGAndrew Glen
Andrew Glen
A comprehensive dataset of microphysical and radiative properties of aerosols and clouds in the boundary layer in the vicinity of Barrow, Alaska, was collected in April 2008 during the Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC). ISDAC's primary aim was to examine the effects of aerosols, including those generated by Asian wildfires, on clouds that contain both liquid and ice. ISDAC utilized the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Pro- gram's permanent observational facilities at Barrow and specially deployed instruments measuring aerosol, ice fog, precipitation, and radiation. The National Research Council of Canada Convair-580 flew 27 sorties and collected data using an unprecedented 41 stateof- the-art cloud and aerosol instruments for more than 100 h on 12 different days. Aerosol compositions, including fresh and processed sea salt, biomassburning particles, organics, and sulfates mixed with organics, varied between flights. Observations in a dense arctic haze on 19 April and above, withi... Abstract A comprehensive dataset of microphysical and radiative properties of aerosols and clouds in the boundary layer in the vicinity of Barrow, Alaska, was collected in April 2008 during the Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC). ISDAC's primary aim was to examine the effects of aerosols, including those generated by Asian wildfires, on clouds that contain both liquid and ice. ISDAC utilized the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Pro- gram's permanent observational facilities at Barrow and specially deployed instruments measuring aerosol, ice fog, precipitation, and radiation. The National Research Council of Canada Convair-580 flew 27 sorties and collected data using an unprecedented 41 stateof- the-art cloud and aerosol instruments for more than 100 h on 12 different days. Aerosol compositions, including fresh and processed sea salt, biomassburning particles, organics, and sulfates mixed with organics, varied between flights. Observations in a dense arctic haze on 19 April and above, withi...

28 November 2016 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KCKamal Kant Chandrakar
Kamal Kant Chandrakar
WCWill Cantrell
Will Cantrell
KCKelken Chang
Kelken Chang
DCDavid Ciochetto
David Ciochetto
DNDennis Niedermeier
Dennis Niedermeier
Fan YangFan Yang
Fan Yang
The influence of aerosol concentration on the cloud-droplet size distribution is investigated in a laboratory chamber that enables turbulent cloud formation through moist convection. The experiments allow steady-state microphysics to be achieved, with aerosol input balanced by cloud-droplet growth and fallout. As aerosol concentration is increased, the cloud-droplet mean diameter decreases, as expected, but the width of the size distribution also decreases sharply. The aerosol input allows for cloud generation in the limiting regimes of fast microphysics ( <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo><</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>τc<τt ) for high aerosol concentration, and slow microphysics ( <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>></mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>τc>τt ) for low aerosol concentration; here, <mml:math><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math>τc is the phase-relaxation time and <mml:math><mml:msub><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math>τt is the turbulence-correlation time. The increase in the width of the droplet size distribution for the low aerosol limit is consistent with larger variability of supersaturation due to the slow microphysical response. A stochastic differential equation for supersaturation predicts that the standard deviation of the squared droplet radius should increase linearly with a system time scale defined as <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>τ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>τs−1=τc−1+τt−1 , and the measurements are in excellent agreement with this finding. The result underscores the importance of droplet size dispersion for aerosol indirect effects: increasing aerosol concentration changes the albedo and suppresses precipitation formation not only through reduction of the mean droplet diameter but also by narrowing of the droplet size distribution due to reduced supersaturation fluctuations. Supersaturation fluctuations in the low aerosol/slow microphysics limit are likely of leading importance for precipitation formation.

8 February 2014 in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MOMikhail Ovchinnikov
Mikhail Ovchinnikov
AAAndrew S. Ackerman
Andrew S. Ackerman
AAAlexander Avramov
Alexander Avramov
ACAnning Cheng
Anning Cheng
JFJiwen Fan
Jiwen Fan
KSKara Sulia
Kara Sulia
Large‐eddy simulations of mixed‐phase Arctic clouds by 11 different models are analyzed with the goal of improving understanding and model representation of processes controlling the evolution of these clouds. In a case based on observations from the Indirect and Semi‐Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC), it is found that ice number concentration, Ni, exerts significant influence on the cloud structure. Increasing Ni leads to a substantial reduction in liquid water path (LWP), in agreement with earlier studies. In contrast to previous intercomparison studies, all models here use the same ice particle properties (i.e., mass‐size, mass‐fall speed, and mass‐capacitance relationships) and a common radiation parameterization. The constrained setup exposes the importance of ice particle size distributions (PSDs) in influencing cloud evolution. A clear separation in LWP and IWP predicted by models with bin and bulk microphysical treatments is documented and attributed primarily to the assumed shape of ice PSD used in bulk schemes. Compared to the bin schemes that explicitly predict the PSD, schemes assuming exponential ice PSD underestimate ice growth by vapor deposition and overestimate mass‐weighted fall speed leading to an underprediction of IWP by a factor of two in the considered case. Sensitivity tests indicate LWP and IWP are much closer to the bin model simulations when a modified shape factor which is similar to that predicted by bin model simulation is used in bulk scheme. These results demonstrate the importance of representation of ice PSD in determining the partitioning of liquid and ice and the longevity of mixed‐phase clouds.

15 August 2012 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMinghuai Wang
Minghuai Wang
SGSteven Ghan
Steven Ghan
XLXiaohong Liu
Xiaohong Liu
TLTristan S. L'Ecuyer
Tristan S. L'Ecuyer
KZKai Zhang
Kai Zhang
JPJoyce E. Penner
Joyce E. Penner

9 June 2011 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWM. Wang
M. Wang
SGS. Ghan
S. Ghan
MOMikhail Ovchinnikov
Mikhail Ovchinnikov
XLX. Liu
X. Liu
RER. Easter
R. Easter
HMH. Morrison
H. Morrison
Much of the large uncertainty in estimates of anthropogenic aerosol effects on climate arises from the multi-scale nature of the interactions between aerosols, clouds and dynamics, which are difficult to represent in conventional general circulation models (GCMs). In this study, we use a multi-scale aerosol-climate model that treats aerosols and clouds across multiple scales to study aerosol indirect effects. This multi-scale aerosol-climate model is an extension of a multi-scale modeling framework (MMF) model that embeds a cloud-resolving model (CRM) within each vertical column of a GCM grid. The extension allows a more physically-based treatment of aerosol-cloud interactions in both stratiform and convective clouds on the global scale in a computationally feasible way. Simulated model fields, including liquid water path (LWP), ice water path, cloud fraction, shortwave and longwave cloud forcing, precipitation, water vapor, and cloud droplet number concentration are in reasonable agreement with observations. The new model performs quantitatively similar to the previous version of the MMF model in terms of simulated cloud fraction and precipitation. The simulated change in shortwave cloud forcing from anthropogenic aerosols is −0.77 W m−2, which is less than half of that (−1.79 W m−2) calculated by the host GCM (NCAR CAM5) with traditional cloud parameterizations and is also at the low end of the estimates of other conventional global aerosol-climate models. The smaller forcing in the MMF model is attributed to a smaller (3.9 %) increase in LWP from preindustrial conditions (PI) to present day (PD) compared with 15.6 % increase in LWP in stratiform clouds in CAM5. The difference is caused by a much smaller response in LWP to a given perturbation in cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations from PI to PD in the MMF (about one-third of that in CAM5), and, to a lesser extent, by a smaller relative increase in CCN concentrations from PI to PD in the MMF (about 26 % smaller than that in CAM5). The smaller relative increase in CCN concentrations in the MMF is caused in part by a smaller increase in aerosol lifetime from PI to PD in the MMF, a positive feedback in aerosol indirect effects induced by cloud lifetime effects from aerosols. The smaller response in LWP to anthropogenic aerosols in the MMF model is consistent with observations and with high resolution model studies, which may indicate that aerosol indirect effects simulated in conventional global climate models are overestimated and point to the need to use global high resolution models, such as MMF models or global CRMs, to study aerosol indirect effects. The simulated total anthropogenic aerosol effect in the MMF is −1.05 W m−2, which is close to the Murphy et al. (2009) inverse estimate of −1.1±0.4 W m−2 (1σ) based on the examination of the Earth's energy balance. Further improvements in the representation of ice nucleation and low clouds in MMF are needed to refine the aerosol indirect effect estimate.