Mohamed Elsayed

Mr. Mohamed Elsayed


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ghaydaa ShehataGhaydaa Shehata
Ghaydaa Shehata
KLKevin Lord
Kevin Lord
MGMichaela Grudzinski
Michaela Grudzinski
MEMohamed Elsayed
Mohamed Elsayed
RARamy Abdelnaby
Ramy Abdelnaby
Hatem A. ElshabrawyHatem A. Elshabrawy
Hatem A. Elshabrawy
COVID-19 is a severe respiratory disease caused by the newly identified human coronavirus (HCoV) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The virus was discovered in December 2019, and in March 2020, the disease was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) due to a high number of cases. Although SARS-CoV-2 primarily affects the respiratory system, several studies have reported neurological complications in COVID-19 patients. Headache, dizziness, loss of taste and smell, encephalitis, encephalopathy, and cerebrovascular diseases are the most common neurological complications that are associated with COVID-19. In addition, seizures, neuromuscular junctions’ disorders, and Guillain–Barré syndrome were reported as complications of COVID-19, as well as neurodegenerative and demyelinating disorders. However, the management of these conditions remains a challenge. In this review, we discuss the prevalence, pathogenesis, and mechanisms of these neurological sequelae that are secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aim to update neurologists and healthcare workers on the possible neurological complications associated with COVID-19 and the management of these disease conditions.

10 June 2023 in New Microbes and New Infections
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Sarya SwedSarya Swed
Sarya Swed
HBHaidara Bohsas
Haidara Bohsas
Muhammad Mainuddin PatwaryMuhammad Mainuddin Patwary
Muhammad Mainuddin Patwary
HAHidar Alibrahim
Hidar Alibrahim
ARAmine Rakab
Amine Rakab
Ranjit SahRanjit Sah
Ranjit Sah
The monkeypox virus (MPXV), an Orthopoxvirus family member, is the zoonotic agent that causes mpox (formerly known as monkeypox). The ongoing mpox pandemic has caused cases across continents involving 110 countries. This study aimed to assess mpox knowledge and its determinants among healthcare personnel. This cross-sectional study was conducted from June 6 to June 25, 2022, among 17 Arab countries. The self-administered questionnaire consists of 53 questions assessing the knowledge about the monkeypox virus. In total, 5874 medical students and clinical doctors from 17 Arab countries participated in this study. Only 13.8% (n = 812) of respondents have ever received information about mpox during their studies in medicine. The mean knowledge score was 13.84, and the median score was 15 (range 1–34). More than half (51.3%, n = 3012) have heard about mpox before. A low proportion of the participants had a good level of knowledge on mpox. Only 11.7% of respondents had correctly identified the natural host and the incubation period of mpox. More than half (58.9%) were aware of the signs and symptoms of mpox. Few respondents (28%) believed that mpox and smallpox have similar signs and symptoms. Specialist doctors had higher knowledge of mpox (AOR = 2.96, 95% CI = 2.24–3.92, p < 0.001) than other cadres. Mpox awareness among Arabic medical students and practitioners is low; hence immediate action in creating awareness among arab healthcare professionals is the need of the hour. This is crucial in the mpox early detection and prevention of its spread.

25 April 2022 in Frontiers in Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MEMohamed Elsayed
Mohamed Elsayed
CSCarlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona
Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona
XWXenia Anna Welte
Xenia Anna Welte
KDKhaled Tarek Dardeer
Khaled Tarek Dardeer
MKManar Ahmed Kamal
Manar Ahmed Kamal
Muhammad Aziz RahmanMuhammad Aziz Rahman
Muhammad Aziz Rahman
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed enormous psychological discomfort and fear across the globe, including Germany.Objectives: To assess the levels of COVID-19 associated psychological distress and fear amongst Southern German population, and to identify their coping strategies.Methods: A cross-sectional survey using an online questionnaire was conducted in healthcare and community settings in the region of Ulm, Southern Germany. Assessment inventories were the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS), and the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S), which were valid and reliable tools.Results: A total of 474 Individuals participated in the study. The mean age was 33.6 years, and 327 (69%) were females. Most participants (n = 381, 80.4%) had high levels of psychological distress, whereas only 5.1% had high levels of fear, and two-thirds of participants showed higher levels of coping. Moderate to very high levels of psychological distress were associated with being female, living alone, distress due to employment changes, experiencing financial impact, having multiple co-morbidities, being a smoker, increased alcohol use over the previous 6 months, contact with COVID-19 cases and healthcare providers for COVID-19-related stress. Individuals who were ≥60 years, lived with non-family members, had co-morbidities and visited a healthcare provider had higher levels of fear. Higher levels of education and income showed better coping amongst participants.Conclusion: Psychological distress was very high during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany and associated with low levels of coping. This study identified vulnerable groups of people, who should be given priorities for addressing their health and wellbeing in future crisis periods.

5 May 2023 in Frontiers in Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AKAbdulrhman Khaity
Abdulrhman Khaity
NANada Mostafa Al-Dardery
Nada Mostafa Al-Dardery
KAKhaled Albakri
Khaled Albakri
OAOmar A. Abdelwahab
Omar A. Abdelwahab
MHMahmoud Tarek Hefnawy
Mahmoud Tarek Hefnawy
MEMohamed Elsayed
Mohamed Elsayed
Aims: We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-agonists (GLP-1RA) treatment on cardio-metabolic parameters among antipsychotic-treated patients with schizophrenia.Methods: We searched the Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus for relevant Randomized Clinical trials (RCTs) from inception until 1 August 2022. Documents were screened for qualified articles, and all concerned outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RR) or mean difference (MD) in the meta-analysis models using Review Manager (RevMan version 5.4).Results: Pooling data from 7 RCTs (398 patients) showed that GLP-1 RA was superior to placebo with regard to body weight [MD = - 4.68, 95% CI (-4.90,−4.46), P < 0.00001], waist circumference [MD = - 3.66, 95% CI (-3.89,−3.44), P < 0.00001], body mass index (BMI) [MD = - 1.09, 95% CI (-1.25,−0.93), P < 0.00001], systolic blood pressure (SBP) [MD = - 3.07, 95% CI (-3.61,−2.53), P < 0.00001], and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) [MD = - 2.02, 95% CI (-2.42,−1.62), P < 0.00001]. The total effect did not favor either of the two groups with respect to insulin and respiratory adverse events {[MD = - 0.06, 95% CI (-0.36, 0.24), p = 0.70], [RR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.31, 1.40), p = 0.28]; respectively}.Conclusion: Our analysis revealed that GLP-1 RA treatment is safe and effective on cardio-metabolic parameters over control in antipsychotic-treated patients with schizophrenia. Nevertheless, the present evidence is not sufficient to confirm the safety and efficacy of GLP-1RA treatment on insulin and respiratory adverse events. Therefore, further studies are recommended.Systematic review registration: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022333040.

31 May 2021 in Journal Of Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARamy Abdelnaby
Ramy Abdelnaby
MEMohamed Elsayed
Mohamed Elsayed
KMKhaled Mohamed
Khaled Mohamed
KDKhaled T. Dardeer
Khaled T. Dardeer
YSYousef Tarek Sonbol
Yousef Tarek Sonbol
AMAndrea Maier
Andrea Maier
Purpose: To establish the first comprehensive and standardized set of vagus nerve (VN) sonographic reference values across all the published studies that can be used to standardize and guide clinical practice and research. Methods: This systematic review includes all possible available data from a total of 27 studies and 21 of them were included in the meta-analysis having a total of 864 participants. Results: The overall mean cross-sectional area ranged from 2.29 to 2.76 mm2 for the right VN and from 1.83 to 2.23 mm2 for the left VN with 95% confidence interval. Sonographic reference values of VN at common carotid artery bifurcation, thyroid gland, and cartilage as well as other anatomic landmarks were provided. Conclusions: The mean cross-sectional area of the right VN of 2.53 mm2 and the left one of 2.03 mm2 can be considered as sonographic reference values in healthy adults. This review provides these reference values to be considered in the further sonographic evaluation of VNs.

29 March 2023 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sarya SwedSarya Swed
Sarya Swed
HBHaidara Bohsas
Haidara Bohsas
HAHidar Alibrahim
Hidar Alibrahim
ARAmine Rakab
Amine Rakab
Wael HafezWael Hafez
Wael Hafez
Ranjit SahRanjit Sah
Ranjit Sah
Background: The outbreak of monkeypox was declared a global public health emergency by the World Health Organization on 23 July 2022. There have been 60,000 cases reported worldwide, most of which are in places where monkeypox has never been seen due to the travel of people who have the virus. This research aims to evaluate the general Arabic population in regard to the monkeypox disease, fears, and vaccine adoption after the WHO proclaimed a monkeypox epidemic and to compare these attitudes to those of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed in some Arabic countries (Syria, Egypt, Qatar, Yemen, Jordan, Sudan, Algeria, and Iraq) between 18 August and 7 September 2022. The inclusion criteria were the general public residing in Arabic nations and being older than 18. This questionnaire has 32 questions separated into three sections: sociodemographic variables, prior COVID-19 exposure, and COVID-19 vaccination history. The second portion assesses the knowledge and anxieties about monkeypox, while the third section includes the generalized anxiety disorder (GAD7) scale. Logistic regression analyses were performed to compute the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their confidence intervals (95%CI) using STATA (version 17.0). Results: A total of 3665 respondents from 17 Arabic countries were involved in this study. Almost two-thirds (n = 2427, 66.2%) of the participants expressed more worry about COVID-19 than monkeypox diseases. Regarding the major cause for concern about monkeypox, 39.5% of participants attributed their anxiety to the fear that they or a member of their family may contract the illness, while 38.4% were concerned about monkeypox becoming another worldwide pandemic. According to the GAD 7 score, 71.7% of the respondents showed very low anxiety toward monkeypox and 43.8% of the participants scored poor levels of knowledge about monkeypox disease. Participants with previous COVID-19 infection showed a 1.206 times greater acceptance to receive the monkeypox vaccine than those with no previous infection. A 3.097 times higher concern for monkeypox than COVID-19 was shown by the participants who perceived monkeypox as dangerous and virulent than those who did not. Participants who have a chronic disease (aOR: 1.32; 95%CI: 1.09–1.60); participants worried about monkeypox (aOR: 1.21; 95%CI: 1.04–1.40), and perceived monkeypox as a dangerous and virulent disease (aOR: 2.25; 95%CI: 1.92–2.65); and excellent knowledge level (aOR: 2.28; 95%CI: 1.79–2.90) have emerged as significant predictors. Conclusions: Our study reported that three-fourths of the participants were more concerned about COVID-19 than monkeypox disease. In addition, most of the participants have inadequate levels of knowledge regarding monkeypox disease. Hence, immediate action should be taken to address this problem. Consequently, learning about monkeypox and spreading information about its prevention is crucial.