Ehud Ahissar

Prof. Ehud Ahissar

Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 November 2001 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ehud AhissarEhud Ahissar
Ehud Ahissar
SNSrikantan Nagarajan
Srikantan Nagarajan
MAMerav Ahissar
Merav Ahissar
APAthanassios Protopapas
Athanassios Protopapas
HMHenry Mahncke
Henry Mahncke
MMMichael M. Merzenich
Michael M. Merzenich
Speech comprehension depends on the integrity of both the spectral content and temporal envelope of the speech signal. Although neural processing underlying spectral analysis has been intensively studied, less is known about the processing of temporal information. Most of speech information conveyed by the temporal envelope is confined to frequencies below 16 Hz, frequencies that roughly match spontaneous and evoked modulation rates of primary auditory cortex neurons. To test the importance of cortical modulation rates for speech processing, we manipulated the frequency of the temporal envelope of speech sentences and tested the effect on both speech comprehension and cortical activity. Magnetoencephalographic signals from the auditory cortices of human subjects were recorded while they were performing a speech comprehension task. The test sentences used in this task were compressed in time. Speech comprehension was degraded when sentence stimuli were presented in more rapid (more compressed) forms. We found that the average comprehension level, at each compression, correlated with ( i ) the similarity between the frequencies of the temporal envelopes of the stimulus and the subject's cortical activity (“stimulus-cortex frequency-matching”) and ( ii ) the phase-locking (PL) between the two temporal envelopes (“stimulus-cortex PL”). Of these two correlates, PL was significantly more indicative for single-trial success. Our results suggest that the match between the speech rate and the a priori modulation capacities of the auditory cortex is a prerequisite for comprehension. However, this is not sufficient: stimulus-cortex PL should be achieved during actual sentence presentation.

1 July 2000 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ehud AhissarEhud Ahissar
Ehud Ahissar
RSRonen Sosnik
Ronen Sosnik
SHSebastian Haidarliu
Sebastian Haidarliu

1 October 2001 in Neuron
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ehud AhissarEhud Ahissar
Ehud Ahissar
AAAmos Arieli
Amos Arieli

18 April 2006 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CYChunxiu Yu
Chunxiu Yu
DDDori Derdikman
Dori Derdikman
SHSebastian Haidarliu
Sebastian Haidarliu
Ehud AhissarEhud Ahissar
Ehud Ahissar
In active sensation, sensory information is acquired via movements of sensory organs; rats move their whiskers repetitively to scan the environment, thus detecting, localizing, and identifying objects. Sensory information, in turn, affects future motor movements. How this motor-sensory-motor functional loop is implemented across anatomical loops of the whisker system is not yet known. While inducing artificial whisking in anesthetized rats, we recorded the activity of individual neurons from three thalamic nuclei of the whisker system, each belonging to a different major afferent pathway: paralemniscal, extralemniscal (a recently discovered pathway), or lemniscal. We found that different sensory signals related to active touch are conveyed separately via the thalamus by these three parallel afferent pathways. The paralemniscal pathway conveys sensor motion (whisking) signals, the extralemniscal conveys contact (touch) signals, and the lemniscal pathway conveys combined whisking–touch signals. This functional segregation of anatomical pathways raises the possibility that different sensory-motor processes, such as those related to motion control, object localization, and object identification, are implemented along different motor-sensory-motor loops.

9 May 2016 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Ehud AhissarEhud Ahissar
Ehud Ahissar
EAEldad Assa
Eldad Assa
Perception of external objects involves sensory acquisition via the relevant sensory organs. A widely-accepted assumption is that the sensory organ is the first station in a serial chain of processing circuits leading to an internal circuit in which a percept emerges. This open-loop scheme, in which the interaction between the sensory organ and the environment is not affected by its concurrent downstream neuronal processing, is strongly challenged by behavioral and anatomical data. We present here a hypothesis in which the perception of external objects is a closed-loop dynamical process encompassing loops that integrate the organism and its environment and converging towards organism-environment steady-states. We discuss the consistency of closed-loop perception (CLP) with empirical data and show that it can be synthesized in a robotic setup. Testable predictions are proposed for empirical distinction between open and closed loop schemes of perception.

15 September 2001 in Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EGEfrat Gamzu
Efrat Gamzu
Ehud AhissarEhud Ahissar
Ehud Ahissar
While scanning a textured surface with fingers, tactile information is encoded both spatially, by differential activation of adjacent receptors, and temporally, by changes in receptor activation during movements of the fingers across the surface. We used a tactile discrimination task to examine the dependence of human tactile perception on the availability of spatial and temporal cues. Subjects discriminated between spatial frequencies of metal gratings presented simultaneously to both hands. Tactile temporal cues were eliminated by preventing lateral hand movements; tactile spatial cues were eliminated by using gloves with an attached rubber pin. Analysis revealed separation of the subjects into two groups: “spatiotemporal” (ST) and “latent-temporal” (LT). Under normal conditions, the performance of ST subjects was significantly better than that of the LT subjects. Prevention of lateral movements impaired performance of both ST and LT subjects. However, when only temporal cues were available, the performance of ST subjects was significantly impaired, whereas that of the LT subjects either improved or did not change. Under the latter condition, LT subjects changed strategy to scanning with alternating hands, at velocities similar to the velocities normally used by ST subjects. These velocities generated temporal frequencies between 15 and 30 Hz. The LT subjects were unaware of their improved performance. Nine of ten LT subjects significantly improved their performance under normal conditions when trained to scan gratings using alternating hands and velocities similar to those used by ST subjects. We conclude that (1) temporal cues are essential for spatial-frequency discrimination, (2) human subjects vary in the tactile strategies they use for texture exploration, and (3) poor tactile performers can significantly improve by using strategies that emphasize temporal cues.