Giridhar Athrey

Dr. Giridhar Athrey

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2022 in Cytogenetic and Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jacqueline SmithJacqueline Smith
Jacqueline Smith
JAJames M. Alfieri
James M. Alfieri
NANick Anthony
Nick Anthony
PAPeter Arensburger
Peter Arensburger
GAGiridhar Athrey
Giridhar Athrey
HZHuaijun Zhou
Huaijun Zhou

5 December 2019 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHShawna Marie Hubert
Shawna Marie Hubert
MAMorouj Al-Ajeeli
Morouj Al-Ajeeli
CBChristopher A. Bailey
Christopher A. Bailey
GAGiridhar Athrey
Giridhar Athrey
The gut microbiota of chicken has received much attention due to its importance for bird health, food safety, and performance. In the United States, the impending transition to cage-free housing environments has raised many questions about its consequences for poultry health, productivity, and welfare. Therefore, we investigated how housing environments and feed composition affect the poultry gut microbiome. Such data is necessary to inform the design of production systems that promote health and food safety. In this study, we investigated the cecal microbiome of both caged and cage-free laying hens that were fed either an industry-standard soy-based versus a soy-free diet. Caged hens were housed in standard industry-style layer cages with one bird per cage, and cage-free hens were housed in a poultry barn with an outdoor enclosed yard with multiple hens per pen. Our study showed significant differences in the gut microbiota between cage-free and caged environments. Cage free housing generated higher diversity compared to caged housing. Furthermore, we observed a synergistic interaction of soy-based feed in cage-free housing, as the cage-free soy group showed the highest alpha diversity, whereas the caged-soy group showed the lowest diversity overall.
1

5 August 2008 in Molecular Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KBKelly R. Barr
Kelly R. Barr
DLDenise L. Lindsay
Denise L. Lindsay
GAGiridhar Athrey
Giridhar Athrey
RLRichard F. Lance
Richard F. Lance
THTimothy J. Hayden
Timothy J. Hayden
PLPaul L. Leberg
Paul L. Leberg

24 January 2012 in Evolutionary Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GAGiridhar Athrey
Giridhar Athrey
KBKelly R. Barr
Kelly R. Barr
RLRichard F. Lance
Richard F. Lance
PLPaul L. Leberg
Paul L. Leberg
Anthropogenic alterations in the natural environment can be a potent evolutionary force. For species that have specific habitat requirements, habitat loss can result in substantial genetic effects, potentially impeding future adaptability and evolution. The endangered black‐capped vireo (Vireo atricapilla) suffered a substantial contraction of breeding habitat and population size during much of the 20th century. In a previous study, we reported significant differentiation between remnant populations, but failed to recover a strong genetic signal of bottlenecks. In this study, we used a combination of historical and contemporary sampling from Oklahoma and Texas to (i) determine whether population structure and genetic diversity have changed over time and (ii) evaluate alternate demographic hypotheses using approximate Bayesian computation (ABC). We found lower genetic diversity and increased differentiation in contemporary samples compared to historical samples, indicating nontrivial impacts of fragmentation. ABC analysis suggests a bottleneck having occurred in the early part of the 20th century, resulting in a magnitude decline in effective population size. Genetic monitoring with temporally spaced samples, such as used in this study, can be highly informative for assessing the genetic impacts of anthropogenic fragmentation on threatened or endangered species, as well as revealing the dynamics of small populations over time.

13 December 2012 in PLOS Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GAGiridhar Athrey
Giridhar Athrey
THTheresa K. Hodges
Theresa K. Hodges
MRMichael R. Reddy
Michael R. Reddy
HOHans J. Overgaard
Hans J. Overgaard
AMAbrahan Matias
Abrahan Matias
MSMichel A. Slotman
Michel A. Slotman
Malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa have proven themselves very difficult adversaries in the global struggle against malaria. Decades of anti-vector interventions have yielded mixed results—with successful reductions in transmission in some areas and limited impacts in others. These varying successes can be ascribed to a lack of universally effective vector control tools, as well as the development of insecticide resistance in mosquito populations. Understanding the impact of vector control on mosquito populations is crucial for planning new interventions and evaluating existing ones. However, estimates of population size changes in response to control efforts are often inaccurate because of limitations and biases in collection methods. Attempts to evaluate the impact of vector control on mosquito effective population size (Ne) have produced inconclusive results thus far. Therefore, we obtained data for 13–15 microsatellite markers for more than 1,500 mosquitoes representing multiple time points for seven populations of three important vector species—Anopheles gambiae, An. melas, and An. moucheti—in Equatorial Guinea. These populations were exposed to indoor residual spraying or long-lasting insecticidal nets in recent years. For comparison, we also analyzed data from two populations that have no history of organized vector control. We used Approximate Bayesian Computation to reconstruct their demographic history, allowing us to evaluate the impact of these interventions on the effective population size. In six of the seven study populations, vector control had a dramatic impact on the effective population size, reducing Ne between 55%–87%, the exception being a single An. melas population. In contrast, the two negative control populations did not experience a reduction in effective population size. This study is the first to conclusively link anti-vector intervention programs in Africa to sharply reduced effective population sizes of malaria vectors. The battle against malaria mosquitoes in sub-Saharan Africa is being fought with two main weapons: indoor residual spraying of insecticides (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) campaigns. Although many programs have been successful in reducing malaria infection, demonstrating the impact of these programs on vector populations is typically confounded by numerous variables associated with collection methods. Here, we analyzed more than 1,500 samples of three important malaria vectors—Anopheles gambiae, An. melas, and An. moucheti—from seven sites in Equatorial Guinea that were collected over the course of anti-vector programs in that country (2004–2010). Taking advantage of recently developed coalescent genetic approaches, we derived the demographic history, estimated the effective population size, and determined the timings of population size changes. We demonstrate convincingly for the first time that both IRS– and LLIN–based control resulted in lowered effective population sizes in most cases. No such reductions were observed in negative control populations. Our findings are especially important to malaria control because estimating population sizes using conventional trapping approaches is often limited by our ability to obtain representative samples. More importantly, we were able to conclusively link anti-vector interventions to genetic impacts, a linkage that has been difficult to establish in the past.

14 March 2019 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAnne-Sophie Charlotte Hieke
Anne-Sophie Charlotte Hieke
SHShawna Marie Hubert
Shawna Marie Hubert
GAGiridhar Athrey
Giridhar Athrey
The gut microbiota is crucial for metabolic homeostasis, immunity, growth and overall health, and it is recognized that early-life microbiota acquisition is a pivotal event for later-life health. Recent studies show that gut microbiota diversity and functional activity are synchronized with the host circadian rhythms in healthy individuals, and circadian disruption elicits dysbiosis in mammalian models. However, no studies have determined the associations between circadian disruption in early life, microbiota colonization, and the consequences for microbiota structure in birds. Chickens, as a major source of protein around the world, are one of the most important agricultural species, and their gut and metabolic health are significant concerns. The poultry industry routinely employs extended photoperiods (>18 h light) as a management tool, and their impacts on the chicken circadian, its role in gut microbiota acquisition in early life (first 3 weeks of life), and consequences for later life microbiota structure remain unknown. In this study, the objectives were to (a) characterize circadian activity under two different light regimes in layer chicken (12/12 h′ Light/Dark (LD) and 23/1 h LD), (b) characterize gut microbiota acquisition and composition in the first 4 weeks of life, (c) determine if gut microbiota oscillate in synchrony with the host circadian rhythm, and (d) to determine if fecal microbiota is representative of cecal microbiota in early life. Expression of clock genes (clock,bmal1, andper2) was assayed, and fecal and cecal microbiotas were characterized using 16S rRNA gene amplicon analyses from birds raised under two photoperiod treatments. Chickens raised under 12/12 LD photoperiods exhibited rhythmic clock gene activity, which was absent in birds raised under the extended (23/1 LD) photoperiod. There was differential microbiota acquisition under different photoperiod regimes in newly hatched chicks. Gut microbiota members showed a similar oscillating pattern as the host, but this association was not as strong as found in mammals. Finally, the fecal microbiota was found to be not representative of cecal microbiota membership and structure in young birds. This is one of the first studies to demonstrate the use of photoperiods to modulate microbiota acquisition in newly hatched chicks, and show their potential as a tool to promote the colonization of beneficial microorganisms.