Dietmar Georg

Dr. Dietmar Georg

Department of Radiation Oncology and Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2011 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RPRichard Pötter
Richard Pötter
PGPetra Georg
Petra Georg
JDJohannes C.A. Dimopoulos
Johannes C.A. Dimopoulos
MGMagdalena Grimm
Magdalena Grimm
DBDaniel Berger
Daniel Berger
Christian KirisitsChristian Kirisits
Christian Kirisits
To analyse the overall clinical outcome and benefits by applying protocol based image guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)±chemotherapy (ChT). Treatment schedule was EBRT with 45-50.4Gy±concomitant cisplatin chemotherapy plus 4×7Gy High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Patients were treated in the "protocol period" (2001-2008) with the prospective application of the High Risk CTV concept (D90) and dose volume constraints for organs at risk including biological modelling. Dose volume adaptation was performed with the aim of dose escalation in large tumours (prescribed D90>85Gy), often with inserting additional interstitial needles. Dose volume constraints (D(2cc)) were 70-75Gy for rectum and sigmoid and 90Gy for bladder. Late morbidity was prospectively scored, using LENT/SOMA Score. Disease outcome and treatment related late morbidity were evaluated and compared using actuarial analysis. One hundred and fifty-six consecutive patients (median age 58years) with cervix cancer FIGO stages IB-IVA were treated with definitive radiotherapy in curative intent. Histology was squamous cell cancer in 134 patients (86%), tumour size was >5cm in 103 patients (66%), lymph node involvement in 75 patients (48%). Median follow-up was 42months for all patients. Interstitial techniques were used in addition to intracavitary brachytherapy in 69/156 (44%) patients. Total prescribed mean dose (D90) was 93±13Gy, D(2cc) 86±17Gy for bladder, 65±9Gy for rectum and 64±9Gy for sigmoid. Complete remission was achieved in 151/156 patients (97%). Overall local control at 3years was 95%; 98% for tumours 2-5cm, and 92% for tumours >5cm (p=0.04), 100% for IB, 96% for IIB, 86% for IIIB. Cancer specific survival at 3years was overall 74%, 83% for tumours 2-5cm, 70% for tumours >5cm, 83% for IB, 84% for IIB, 52% for IIIB. Overall survival at 3years was in total 68%, 72% for tumours 2-5cm, 65% for tumours >5cm, 74% for IB, 78% for IIB, 45% for IIIB. In regard to late morbidity in total 188 grade 1+2 and 11 grade 3+4 late events were observed in 143 patients. G1+2/G3+4 events for bladder were n=32/3, for rectum n=14/5, for bowel (including sigmoid) n=3/0, for vagina n=128/2, respectively. 3D conformal radiotherapy±chemotherapy plus image (MRI) guided adaptive intracavitary brachytherapy including needle insertion in advanced disease results in local control rates of 95-100% at 3years in limited/favourable (IB/IIB) and 85-90% in large/poor response (IIB/III/IV) cervix cancer patients associated with a moderate rate of treatment related morbidity. Compared to the historical Vienna series there is relative reduction in pelvic recurrence by 65-70% and reduction in major morbidity. The local control improvement seems to have impact on CSS and OS. Prospective clinical multi-centre studies are mandatory to evaluate these challenging mono-institutional findings.

1 February 2018 in Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RPRichard Pötter
Richard Pötter
KTKari Tanderup
Kari Tanderup
Christian KirisitsChristian Kirisits
Christian Kirisits
ALAstrid de Leeuw
Astrid de Leeuw
KKKathrin Kirchheiner
Kathrin Kirchheiner
IJIna Jürgenliemk-Schulz
Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz
The publication of the GEC-ESTRO recommendations one decade ago was a significant step forward for reaching international consensus on adaptive target definition and dose reporting in image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer. Since then, IGABT has been spreading, particularly in Europe, North America and Asia, and the guidelines have proved their broad acceptance and applicability in clinical practice. However, a unified approach to volume contouring and reporting does not imply a unified administration of treatment, and currently both external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and IGABT are delivered using a large variety of techniques and prescription/fractionation schedules. With IGABT, local control is excellent in limited and well-responding tumours. The major challenges are currently loco-regional control in advanced tumours, treatment-related morbidity, and distant metastatic disease. Emerging evidence from the RetroEMBRACE and EMBRACE I studies has demonstrated that clinical outcome is related to dose prescription and technique. The next logical step is to demonstrate excellent clinical outcome with the most advanced EBRT and brachytherapy techniques based on an evidence-based prospective dose and volume prescription protocol. The EMBRACE II study is an interventional and observational multicentre study which aims to benchmark a high level of local, nodal and systemic control while limiting morbidity, using state of the art treatment including an advanced target volume selection and contouring protocol for EBRT and brachytherapy, a multi-parametric brachytherapy dose prescription protocol (clinical validation of dose constraints), and use of advanced EBRT (IMRT and IGRT) and brachytherapy (IC/IS) techniques (clinical validation). The study also incorporates translational research including imaging and tissue biomarkers.

1 June 2006 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Christian KirisitsChristian Kirisits
Christian Kirisits
SLStefan Lang
Stefan Lang
JDJohannes Dimopoulos
Johannes Dimopoulos
DBDaniel Berger
Daniel Berger
Dietmar GeorgDietmar Georg
Dietmar Georg
RPRichard Pötter
Richard Pötter

1 July 2005 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Christian KirisitsChristian Kirisits
Christian Kirisits
RPRichard Pötter
Richard Pötter
SLStefan Lang
Stefan Lang
JDJohannes Dimopoulos
Johannes Dimopoulos
NWNatascha Wachter-Gerstner
Natascha Wachter-Gerstner
Dietmar GeorgDietmar Georg
Dietmar Georg

15 February 2011 in Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Dietmar GeorgDietmar Georg
Dietmar Georg
TKTommy Knöös
Tommy Knöös
BMBrendan McClean
Brendan McClean

1 February 2012 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPetra Georg
Petra Georg
RPRichard Pötter
Richard Pötter
Dietmar GeorgDietmar Georg
Dietmar Georg
SLStefan Lang
Stefan Lang
JDJohannes C.A. Dimopoulos
Johannes C.A. Dimopoulos
WDWolfgang Dörr
Wolfgang Dörr