JiaFeng Chen

Dr. JiaFeng Chen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 January 2020 in Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJiaFeng Chen
JiaFeng Chen
CHChung-Yuan Hsu
Chung-Yuan Hsu
SYShan-Fu Yu
Shan-Fu Yu
CKChi-Hua Ko
Chi-Hua Ko
WCWen-Chan Chiu
Wen-Chan Chiu
TCTientsai Cheng
Tientsai Cheng
Objectives: To investigate changes in BMD in RA patients receiving 3-year biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARD) or conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). Methods: Patients with RA were recruited from September 2014 until March 2019. Clinical characteristics, BMD and evidence of fragility fractures at enrolment were documented. Participants were treated according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines over a 3-year observation period. Repeated BMD was measured at the end of the study period. Participants were grouped into those receiving b/tsDMARD or csDMARD and by propensity score matching (1:2). Results: A total of 388 participants completed the 3-year follow-up. After propensity score matching, 92 and 184 participants were allocated to the b/tsDMARD (Group I) and csDMARD (Group II), respectively. After 3 years, BMD remained stable at the femoral neck (FN), hip (total) (TH) and lumbar vertebra (L1-4) (P =0.09, 0.15, 0.87) in Group I. However, BMD decreased significantly in Group II (P=0.045, <0.001, 0.004) at corresponding sites. Participants receiving combined b/tsDMARD and anti-osteoporosis therapy experienced a greater BMD preserving effect than other subgroups. Conclusion: Long-term b/tsDMARDs therapy had protective effects on bone loss for patients with RA. Patients receiving concomitant anti-osteoporosis therapy and b/tsDMARDs therapy experienced the greatest BMD preserving effect.

17 January 2019 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLShang-Hung Lin
Shang-Hung Lin
JHJi-Chen Ho
Ji-Chen Ho
SLSung-Chou Li
Sung-Chou Li
JCJiaFeng Chen
JiaFeng Chen
CHChang-Chun Hsiao
Chang-Chun Hsiao
CLChih-Hung Lee
Chih-Hung Lee
In psoriatic arthritis (PsA), progressive bone destruction is mediated by monocyte-derived osteoclasts. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate many pathophysiological processes; however, their function in PsA patient monocytes has not been examined. This study aims to address whether specific miRNAs in CD14+ monocytes and monocyte-derived osteoclasts cause active osteoclastogenesis in PsA patients. Candidate miRNAs related to monocyte activation (miR-146a-5p, miR-146b-5p and miR-155-5p) were measured in circulatory CD14+ monocytes collected from 34 PsA patients, 17 psoriasis without arthritis (PsO) patients, and 34 normal controls (NCs). CD14+ monocytes were cultured with media containing TNF-α and RANKL to differentiate into osteoclasts. Osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption were measured by TRAP immunostaining and dentin slice resorption, respectively. The results showed that the miR-146a-5p expression was higher in PsA patient-derived CD14+ monocytes compared to PsO and NCs. Activation and bone resorption were selectively enhanced in osteoclasts from PsA patients, but both were abrogated by RNA interference against miR-146a-5p. More importantly, after clinical improvement using biologics, the increased miR-146a-5p expression in CD14+ monocytes from PsA patients was selectively abolished, and associated with blood CRP level. Our findings indicate that miR-146a-5p expression in CD14+ monocytes derived from PsA patients correlates with clinical efficacy, and induction of osteoclast activation and bone resorption.

20 April 2021 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHChung-Yuan Hsu
Chung-Yuan Hsu
YSYu-Jih Su
Yu-Jih Su
JCJiaFeng Chen
JiaFeng Chen
CSChi‐Chin Sun
Chi‐Chin Sun
TCTien‐Tsai Cheng
Tien‐Tsai Cheng
Tien-Hsing ChenTien-Hsing Chen
Tien-Hsing Chen
Background: Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. It is believed that using disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to control inflammation can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. In this study, we investigated whether patients who responded differently to DMARDs might sustain different cardiovascular events. Methods and Results: We designed a cohort study using the Chang Gung Research Database. We identified 7114 patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. After strict exclusion criteria, we collected 663 individuals as an inadequate response to DMARDs group. Then, 2034 individuals were included as the control group. The end point was composite vascular outcomes, including acute coronary syndrome or ischemic stroke. We used the inverse probability of treatment weighting to keep the covariates between these 2 groups well balanced. We compared the risk of these outcomes using the Cox proportional hazards model. The mean follow‐up time was 4.7 years. During follow‐up, there were 7.5% and 6.4% of patients with composite vascular outcomes in the DMARD‐inadequate response and control groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the risk of composite vascular outcomes (95% CI, 0.94–1.41) and ischemic stroke (95% CI, 0.84–1.36). The risk of acute coronary syndrome was significantly higher in the DMARD‐inadequate response group (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.02–2.05). Conclusions: Patients with DMARD‐inadequate response rheumatoid arthritis have a higher risk of developing acute coronary syndrome than those whose disease can be controlled by DMARDs.

19 February 2024 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJiaFeng Chen
JiaFeng Chen
SYShan-Fu Yu
Shan-Fu Yu
WCWenChan Chiu
WenChan Chiu
CKChi-Hua Ko
Chi-Hua Ko
CHChung-Yuan Hsu
Chung-Yuan Hsu
TCTientsai Cheng
Tientsai Cheng
Long-term Glucocorticoid (GC) use results in compromised bone strength and fractures, and several treatment recommendations have been developed to prevent fractures, but none have been validated in a real-world setting. This study aims to create a treatment decision tool and compares this tool to the treatment suggestions from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Calcified Tissue Society (IOF-ECTS), and GC-adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (GC-FRAX), above the intervention threshold. We utilized registry data gathered at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung, Taiwan, between September 2014 and April 2021. This research is a single-center, observational, and case-controlled study. We recruited participants using prednisone for at least 2.5 mg/day or the equivalent dose for over 3 months, excluding those younger than 40, those with malignancies, or those currently undergoing anti-osteoporosis therapy. The primary endpoint was new fragility fractures within 3 years, including morphometric vertebral fractures detected at baseline and with a follow-up thoracic–lumbar spine X-ray. Participants were randomly allocated into derivation and validation sets. We developed the Steroid-Associated Fracture Evaluation (SAFE) tool in the derivation cohort by assessing the weights of exploratory variables via logistic regression. Prediction performance was compared in the validation set by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve (AUC), and sensitivity and specificity. A total of 424 treatment-naïve subjects were enrolled, and 83 (19.6%) experienced new fractures within 3 years. The final formula of the SAFE tool includes osteoporosis (1 point), an accumulated GC dose ≥ 750 mg within 6 months (or equivalent prednisolone of ≥4.5 mg/day for 6 months) (1 point), a BMI ≥ 23.5 (1 point), previous fractures (1 point), and elderliness of ≥70 years (2 points). In the validation set, a treatment decision based on the SAFE ≥ 2 points demonstrated an AUC of 0.65, with a sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 75.9/54.0/58.9, with an ACR of 0.56 (100.0/11.0/31.0), IOF-ECTS 0.61 (75.9/46.0/52.7), and GC-FRAX 0.62 (82.8/42.0/51.2). Among current GIOP recommendations, the SAFE score serves as an appropriate treatment decision tool with increased accuracy and specificity.

12 November 2025 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJiaFeng Chen
JiaFeng Chen
SYShan-Fu Yu
Shan-Fu Yu
WCWenChan Chiu
WenChan Chiu
CKChi-Hua Ko
Chi-Hua Ko
CHChung-Yuan Hsu
Chung-Yuan Hsu
TCTientsai Cheng
Tientsai Cheng
The authors are issuing a corrigendum for their article