Stephanie M. Moleski

Dr. Stephanie M. Moleski

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMStephanie M. Moleski
Stephanie M. Moleski
ASApeksha Shah
Apeksha Shah
PDPhilip Durney
Philip Durney
MMMichael Matthews
Michael Matthews
Gagan KaushalGagan Kaushal
Gagan Kaushal
ADAnthony J. DiMarino
Anthony J. DiMarino

2 April 2015
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SMStephanie M. Moleski
Stephanie M. Moleski
CLChristina C. Lindenmeyer
Christina C. Lindenmeyer
JVJ. Jon Veloski
J. Jon Veloski
RMRobin S. Miller
Robin S. Miller
CMCynthia L. Miller
Cynthia L. Miller
ADAnthony J. DiMarino
Anthony J. DiMarino
Celiac disease is an immune-mediated small bowel disorder that develops in genetically susceptible individuals upon exposure to dietary gluten. Celiac disease could have extra-intestinal manifestations that affect women’s reproductive health. The aim of this study was to investigate fertility and outcomes of pregnancy among women with celiac disease. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed information collected from patients at a tertiary care celiac center and from members of 2 national celiac disease awareness organizations. Women without celiac disease were used as controls. Women completed an anonymous online survey, answering 43 questions about menstrual history, fertility, and outcomes of pregnancy (329 with small bowel biopsy-confirmed celiac disease and 641 controls). Of the 970 women included in the study, 733 (75.6%) reported that they had been pregnant at some point; there was no significant difference between women with celiac disease (n=245/329, 74.5%) and controls (488/641, 76.1%; P=0.57). However, fewer women with celiac disease than controls (79.6% vs. 84.8%) gave birth following 1 or more pregnancies (P=0.03). Women with celiac disease had higher percentages of spontaneous abortion than controls (50.6% vs. 40.6%; P=0.01), and of premature delivery (23.6% vs. 15.9% among controls; P=0.02). The mean age at menarche was higher in the celiac disease group (12.7 years) than controls (12.4 years; P=0.01). In a retrospective cohort analysis examining reproductive features of women with celiac disease, we associated celiac disease with significant increases in spontaneous abortion, premature delivery, and later age of menarche.

1 January 2015 in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAbhik Roy
Abhik Roy
CSColin Smith
Colin Smith
CDConstantine Daskalakis
Constantine Daskalakis
KVKristin Voorhees
Kristin Voorhees
SMStephanie M. Moleski
Stephanie M. Moleski
DKDavid Kastenberg
David Kastenberg
Aim: Screening first-degree relatives of celiac disease (CD) patients offers an opportunity to diagnose CD in a high-risk population. This study aims to determine how frequently CD patients receive a physician-issued recommendation for first-degree relative screening. Materials and Methods: A 12-question survey assessing whether CD patients receive a physician recommendation to screen first-degree relatives for CD, and the impact of such a recommendation, was validated with outpatients in a university gastroenterology practice (“University”). The 12-question survey was then distributed online to members of a celiac organization - the National Foundation for Celiac Awareness (“NFCA”). Results were collected over 3 months. Univariate analysis was used to compare cohort means and assess the association between demographic and diagnostic factors and first-degree relative screening recommendations. Results: 87 University patients participated in the validation phase. Test-retest reliability of 4 key survey questions was high (Kappa coefficient >0.80). The main analyses were based on data from 677 NFCA and 82 University respondents. Respondents were predominantly female, with a mean age of 45 years. Significantly more University patients received a recommendation for screening (78% vs. 44%, p < 0.001). Ninety-eight percent receiving a screening recommendation (both groups) discussed this with family members, leading to CD screening (University 71%, NFCA 79%) and, ultimately, a CD diagnosis (University 18%, NFCA 27%). Conclusions: Physicians of CD patients often do not recommend screening first-degree family members. The high clinical impact of this recommendation suggests that greater physician compliance with screening may increase the diagnosis of CD in high risk individuals.

30 May 2025 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJason C. Lin
Jason C. Lin
JLJohn C. Lin
John C. Lin
JZJoy Zhao
Joy Zhao
EHElizabeth G. Holt
Elizabeth G. Holt
EMEdwin K. Mcdonald
Edwin K. Mcdonald
SMStephanie M. Moleski
Stephanie M. Moleski