Rationale: There is currently no effective pharmacological treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Recent investigations indicate that drugs with noradrenergic and antimuscarinic effects improve genioglossus muscle activity and upper airway patency during sleep. Objectives: We aimed to determine the effects of the combination of a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (atomoxetine) and an antimuscarinic (oxybutynin) on OSA severity (apnea–hypopnea index [AHI]; primary outcome) and genioglossus responsiveness (secondary outcome) in people with OSA. Methods: A total of 20 people completed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial comparing 1 night of 80 mg atomoxetine plus 5 mg oxybutynin (ato–oxy) to placebo administered before sleep. The AHI and genioglossus muscle responsiveness to negative esophageal pressure swings were measured via in-laboratory polysomnography. In a subgroup of nine patients, the AHI was also measured when the drugs were administered separately. Measurements and Main Results: The participants’ median (interquartile range) age was 53 (46–58) years and body mass index was 34.8 (30.0–40.2) kg/m². ato–oxy lowered AHI by 63% (34–86%), from 28.5 (10.9–51.6) events/h to 7.5 (2.4–18.6) events/h (P < 0.001). Of the 15/20 patients with OSA on placebo (AHI > 10 events/hr), AHI was lowered by 74% (62–88%) (P < 0.001) and all 15 patients exhibited a ≥50% reduction. Genioglossus responsiveness increased approximately threefold, from 2.2 (1.1–4.7)%/cm H₂O on placebo to 6.3 (3.0 to 18.3)%/cm H₂O on ato–oxy (P < 0.001). Neither atomoxetine nor oxybutynin reduced the AHI when administered separately. Conclusions: A combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic agents administered orally before bedtime on 1 night greatly reduced OSA severity. These findings open new possibilities for the pharmacologic treatment of OSA. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02908529).

Rationale: Therapies for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) could be administered on the basis of a patient’s own phenotypic causes (“traits”) if a clinically applicable approach were available. Objectives: Here we aimed to provide a means to quantify two key contributors to OSA—pharyngeal collapsibility and compensatory muscle responsiveness—that is applicable to diagnostic polysomnography. Methods: Based on physiological definitions, pharyngeal collapsibility determines the ventilation at normal (eupneic) ventilatory drive during sleep, and pharyngeal compensation determines the rise in ventilation accompanying a rising ventilatory drive. Thus, measuring ventilation and ventilatory drive (e.g., during spontaneous cyclic events) should reveal a patient’s phenotypic traits without specialized intervention. We demonstrate this concept in patients with OSA (N = 29), using a novel automated noninvasive method to estimate ventilatory drive (polysomnographic method) and using “gold standard” ventilatory drive (intraesophageal diaphragm EMG) for comparison. Specialized physiological measurements using continuous positive airway pressure manipulation were employed for further comparison. The validity of nasal pressure as a ventilation surrogate was also tested (N = 11). Measurements and Main Results: Polysomnography-derived collapsibility and compensation estimates correlated favorably with those quantified using gold standard ventilatory drive (R = 0.83, P < 0.0001; and R = 0.76, P < 0.0001; respectively) and using continuous positive airway pressure manipulation (R = 0.67, P < 0.0001; and R = 0.64, P < 0.001; respectively). Polysomnographic estimates effectively stratified patients into high versus low subgroups (accuracy, 69–86% vs. ventilatory drive measures; P < 0.05). Traits were near-identical using nasal pressure versus pneumotach (N = 11, R ≥ 0.98, both traits; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Phenotypes of pharyngeal dysfunction in OSA are evident from spontaneous changes in ventilation and ventilatory drive during sleep, enabling noninvasive phenotyping in the clinic. Our approach may facilitate precision therapeutic interventions for OSA.

Rationale: Randomized controlled trials have been unable to detect a cardiovascular benefit of continuous positive airway pressure in unselected patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We hypothesize that deleterious cardiovascular outcomes are concentrated in a subgroup of patients with a heightened pulse-rate response to apneas and hypopneas (ΔHR). Methods: We measured the ΔHR in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) (N = 1,395) and the SHHS (Sleep Heart Health Study) (N = 4,575). MESA data were used to determine the functional form of the association between the ΔHR and subclinical cardiovascular biomarkers, whereas primary analyses tested the association of the ΔHR with nonfatal or fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality in longitudinal data from the SHHS. Measurements and Main Results: In the MESA, U-shaped relationships were observed between subclinical CVD biomarkers (coronary artery calcium, NT-proBNP [N-terminal prohormone BNP], and Framingham risk score) and the ΔHR; notably, a high ΔHR (upper quartile) was associated with elevated biomarker scores compared with a midrange ΔHR (25th–75th centiles). In the SHHS, individuals with a high ΔHR compared with a midrange ΔHR were at increased risk of nonfatal or fatal CVD and all-cause mortality (nonfatal adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)], 1.60 [1.28–2.00]; fatal adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.68 [1.22–2.30]; all-cause adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.29 [1.07–1.55]). The risk associated with a high ΔHR was particularly high in those with a substantial hypoxic burden (nonfatal, 1.93 [1.36–2.73]; fatal, 3.50 [2.15–5.71]; all-cause, 1.84 [1.40–2.40]) and was exclusively observed in nonsleepy individuals. Conclusions: Individuals with OSA who demonstrate an elevated ΔHR are at increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study identifies a prognostic biomarker for OSA that appears useful for risk stratification and patient selection for future clinical trials.

Precision medicine for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) requires noninvasive estimates of each patient’s pathophysiological “traits.” Here, we provide the first automated technique to quantify the respiratory arousal threshold—defined as the level of ventilatory drive triggering arousal from sleep—using diagnostic polysomnographic signals in patients with OSA. Ventilatory drive preceding clinically scored arousals was estimated from polysomnographic studies by fitting a respiratory control model (Terrill et al.) to the pattern of ventilation during spontaneous respiratory events. Conceptually, the magnitude of the airflow signal immediately after arousal onset reveals information on the underlying ventilatory drive that triggered the arousal. Polysomnographic arousal threshold measures were compared with gold standard values taken from esophageal pressure and intraoesophageal diaphragm electromyography recorded simultaneously (N = 29). Comparisons were also made to arousal threshold measures using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) dial-downs (N = 28). The validity of using (linearized) nasal pressure rather than pneumotachograph ventilation was also assessed (N = 11). Polysomnographic arousal threshold values were correlated with those measured using esophageal pressure and diaphragm EMG (R = 0.79, p < .0001; R = 0.73, p = .0001), as well as CPAP manipulation (R = 0.73, p < .0001). Arousal threshold estimates were similar using nasal pressure and pneumotachograph ventilation (R = 0.96, p < .0001). The arousal threshold in patients with OSA can be estimated using polysomnographic signals and may enable more personalized therapeutic interventions for patients with a low arousal threshold.

We recently demonstrated that desipramine reduces the sleep-related loss of upper airway dilator muscle activity and reduces pharyngeal collapsibility in healthy humans without obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The aim of the present physiological study was to determine the effects of desipramine on upper airway collapsibility and apnoea–hypopnea index (AHI) in OSA patients.A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised crossover trial in 14 OSA patients was performed. Participants received treatment or placebo in randomised order before sleep. Pharyngeal collapsibility (critical collapsing pressure of the upper airway (P_crit)) and ventilation under both passive (V′_0,passive) and active (V′_0,active) upper airway muscle conditions were evaluated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) manipulation. AHI was quantified off CPAP.Desipramine reduced activeP_crit(median (interquartile range) −5.2 (4.3) cmH₂O on desipramineversus−1.9 (2.7) cmH₂O on placebo; p=0.049) but not passiveP_crit(−2.2 (3.4)versus−0.7 (2.1) cmH₂O; p=0.135). A greater reduction in AHI occurred in those with minimal muscle compensation (defined asV′_0,active−V′_0,passive) on placebo (r=0.71, p=0.009). The reduction in AHI was driven by the improvement in muscle compensation (r=0.72, p=0.009).In OSA patients, noradrenergic stimulation with desipramine improves pharyngeal collapsibility and may be an effective treatment in patients with minimal upper airway muscle compensation.