Jie Dou

Prof. Dr. Jie Dou

China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2019 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Khabat KhosraviKhabat Khosravi
Khabat Khosravi
Himan ShahabiHiman Shahabi
Himan Shahabi
BPBinh Thai Pham
Binh Thai Pham
JAJan Adamowski
Jan Adamowski
ASAtaollah Shirzadi
Ataollah Shirzadi
IPIndra Prakash
Indra Prakash



28 June 2019 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thi-Le LeThi-Le Le
Thi-Le Le
HNHoang Nguyen
Hoang Nguyen
Jie DouJie Dou
Jie Dou
Jian ZhouJian Zhou
Jian Zhou
Energy-efficiency is one of the critical issues in smart cities. It is an essential basis for optimizing smart cities planning. This study proposed four new artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for forecasting the heating load of buildings’ energy efficiency based on the potential of artificial neural network (ANN) and meta-heuristics algorithms, including artificial bee colony (ABC) optimization, particle swarm optimization (PSO), imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA), and genetic algorithm (GA). They were abbreviated as ABC-ANN, PSO-ANN, ICA-ANN, and GA-ANN models; 837 buildings were considered and analyzed based on the influential parameters, such as glazing area distribution (GLAD), glazing area (GLA), orientation (O), overall height (OH), roof area (RA), wall area (WA), surface area (SA), relative compactness (RC), for estimating heating load (HL). Three statistical criteria, such as root-mean-squared error (RMSE), coefficient determination (R2), and mean absolute error (MAE), were used to assess the potential of the aforementioned models. The results indicated that the GA-ANN model provided the highest performance in estimating the heating load of buildings’ energy efficiency, with an RMSE of 1.625, R2 of 0.980, and MAE of 0.798. The remaining models (i.e., PSO-ANN, ICA-ANN, ABC-ANN) yielded lower performance with RMSE of 1.932, 1.982, 1.878; R2 of 0.972, 0.970, 0.973; MAE of 1.027, 0.980, 0.957, respectively.

1 June 2020 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jie DouJie Dou
Jie Dou
YunusAli PulpadanYunusAli Pulpadan
YunusAli Pulpadan
Abdelaziz MerghadiAbdelaziz Merghadi
Abdelaziz Merghadi
ASAtaollah Shirzadi
Ataollah Shirzadi
HNHoang Nguyen
Hoang Nguyen
HYHiromitsu Yamagishi
Hiromitsu Yamagishi

VNViet-Ha Nhu
Viet-Ha Nhu
ASAtaollah Shirzadi
Ataollah Shirzadi
Himan ShahabiHiman Shahabi
Himan Shahabi
Sushant Kumar SinghSushant Kumar Singh
Sushant Kumar Singh
Nadhir Al-AnsariNadhir Al-Ansari
Nadhir Al-Ansari
BABaharin Bin Ahmad
Baharin Bin Ahmad
Shallow landslides damage buildings and other infrastructure, disrupt agriculture practices, and can cause social upheaval and loss of life. As a result, many scientists study the phenomenon, and some of them have focused on producing landslide susceptibility maps that can be used by land-use managers to reduce injury and damage. This paper contributes to this effort by comparing the power and effectiveness of five machine learning, benchmark algorithms—Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine—in creating a reliable shallow landslide susceptibility map for Bijar City in Kurdistan province, Iran. Twenty conditioning factors were applied to 111 shallow landslides and tested using the One-R attribute evaluation (ORAE) technique for modeling and validation processes. The performance of the models was assessed by statistical-based indexes including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the receiver operatic characteristic curve (AUC). Results indicate that all the five machine learning models performed well for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment, but the Logistic Model Tree model (AUC = 0.932) had the highest goodness-of-fit and prediction accuracy, followed by the Logistic Regression (AUC = 0.932), Naïve Bayes Tree (AUC = 0.864), ANN (AUC = 0.860), and Support Vector Machine (AUC = 0.834) models. Therefore, we recommend the use of the Logistic Model Tree model in shallow landslide mapping programs in semi-arid regions to help decision makers, planners, land-use managers, and government agencies mitigate the hazard and risk.