Mehebub Sahana

Dr. Mehebub Sahana


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications


1 January 2021 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDeepakshi Babbar
Deepakshi Babbar
GAG. Areendran
G. Areendran
MSMehebub Sahana
Mehebub Sahana
KSKiranmay Sarma
Kiranmay Sarma
KRKrishna Raj
Krishna Raj
ASAkhil Sivadas
Akhil Sivadas


6 March 2019 in Natural Hazards
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SRSufia Rehman
Sufia Rehman
MSMehebub Sahana
Mehebub Sahana
HHHaoyuan Hong
Haoyuan Hong
HSHaroon Sajjad
Haroon Sajjad
BABaharin Bin Ahmed
Baharin Bin Ahmed

13 August 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Binh Thai PhamBinh Thai Pham
Binh Thai Pham
ASAtaollah Shirzadi
Ataollah Shirzadi
Himan ShahabiHiman Shahabi
Himan Shahabi
EOEbrahim Omidvar
Ebrahim Omidvar
Sushant Kumar SinghSushant Kumar Singh
Sushant Kumar Singh
Saro LeeSaro Lee
Saro Lee
Landslides have multidimensional effects on the socioeconomic as well as environmental conditions of the impacted areas. The aim of this study is the spatial prediction of landslide using hybrid machine learning models including bagging (BA), random subspace (RS) and rotation forest (RF) with alternating decision tree (ADTree) as base classifier in the northern part of the Pithoragarh district, Uttarakhand, Himalaya, India. To construct the database, ten conditioning factors and a total of 103 landslide locations with a ratio of 70/30 were used. The significant factors were determined by chi-square attribute evaluation (CSEA) technique. The validity of the hybrid models was assessed by true positive rate (TP Rate), false positive rate (FP Rate), recall (sensitivity), precision, F-measure and area under the receiver operatic characteristic curve (AUC). Results concluded that land cover was the most important factor while curvature had no effect on landslide occurrence in the study area and it was removed from the modelling process. Additionally, results indicated that although all ensemble models enhanced the power prediction of the ADTree classifier (AUCtraining = 0.859; AUCvalidation = 0.813); however, the RS ensemble model (AUCtraining = 0.883; AUCvalidation = 0.842) outperformed and outclassed the RF (AUCtraining = 0.871; AUCvalidation = 0.840), and the BA (AUCtraining = 0.865; AUCvalidation = 0.836) ensemble model. The obtained results would be helpful for recognizing the landslide prone areas in future to better manage and decrease the damage and negative impacts on the environment.