Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RC48-ADC, a novel humanized anti-HER2 antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, in patients with HER2+ locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) refractory to standard therapies.Patients and Methods: This was a phase II, open-label, multicenter, single-arm study of patients with HER2+ (IHC status 3+ or 2+) locally advanced or mUC who previously failed at least one line of systemic chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). The secondary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate, duration of response, overall survival (OS), and safety.Results: Forty-three patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 20.3 months. The overall confirmed ORR as assessed by the BIRC was 51.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 35.5%–66.7%]. Similar responses were observed in prespecified subgroups, such as those with liver metastasis and those previously treated with anti–programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapies. The median PFS and OS were 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.6–8.9) and 13.9 months (95% CI, 9.1–NE), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were hypoesthesia (60.5%), alopecia (55.8%), and leukopenia (55.8%). Twenty-five (58%) patients experienced grade 3 TRAEs, including hypoesthesia (23.3%) and neutropenia (14.0%). No grade 4 or grade 5 TRAEs occurred.Conclusions: RC48-ADC demonstrated a promising efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with HER2+ locally advanced or mUC who had failed at least one line of systemic chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin (DV, RC48-ADC), a novel humanized anti–human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) refractory to standard or regular therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data analyzed and reported are from two phase II, open-label, multicenter, single-arm studies (RC48-C005 and RC48-C009) in patients with HER2-positive (immunohistochemistry 3+ or 2+) locally advanced or metastatic UC who have progressed on at least one previous line of systemic chemotherapy. Patients received DV treatment (2 mg/kg IV infusion, once every 2 weeks). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients were enrolled in total. The overall confirmed ORR by BIRC was 50.5% (95% CI, 40.6 to 60.3). Consistent results were observed in prespecified subgroups including patients with liver metastasis and patients previously treated with anti–PD-1/L1 therapies. By the cutoff date of May 10, 2022, the median duration of response was 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 10.8). The median PFS and OS were 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.3 to 7.2) and 14.2 months (95% CI, 9.7 to 18.8), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were peripheral sensory neuropathy (68.2%), leukopenia (50.5%), AST increased (42.1%), and neutropenia (42.1%). Fifty-eight (54.2%) patients experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs, including peripheral sensory neuropathy (18.7%) and neutropenia (12.1%). CONCLUSION: DV demonstrated a promising efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic UC who had progressed on at least one line of systemic chemotherapy.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive subtype of lung cancer characterized by rapid tumor growth and early metastasis. Accurate prediction of prognosis and therapeutic response is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. In this study, we conducted a deep-learning analysis of Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained histopathological images using contrastive clustering and identified 50 intricate histomorphological phenotype clusters (HPCs) as pathomic features. We identified two of 50 HPCs with significant prognostic value and then integrated them into a pathomics signature (PathoSig) using the Cox regression model. PathoSig showed significant risk stratification for overall survival and disease-free survival and successfully identified patients who may benefit from postoperative or preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The predictive power of PathoSig was validated in independent multicenter cohorts. Furthermore, PathoSig can provide comprehensive prognostic information beyond the current TNM staging system and molecular subtyping. Overall, our study highlights the significant potential of utilizing histopathology images-based deep learning in improving prognostic predictions and evaluating therapeutic response in SCLC. PathoSig represents an effective tool that aids clinicians in making informed decisions and selecting personalized treatment strategies for SCLC patients.

To evaluate the diagnostic value of a novel fully automated immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay for detection of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion in a large number of ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients. We tested 196 lung ADCs for ALK rearrangement by two IHC assays (Ventana pre-diluted ALK D5F3 antibody with the Optiview DAB IHC detection kit and Optiview Amplification kit, D5F3 by Cell Signaling Technology (CST) with Ultraview DAB detection kit by Ventana), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and real-time reverse transcription–PCR (RT–PCR). CST ALK IHC was scored using the scoring scheme of 0, no staining; 1+, faint; 2+, moderate; and 3+, strong cytoplasmic reactivity in ≥10% of tumor cells. As for Ventana IHC, a binary scoring system (positive or negative for ALK status) was adopted for evaluating the staining results. Among 196 cases tested, 63 (32%), 65 (33%), 70 (36%), and 69 (35%) cases were ALK positive by FISH, Ventana IHC, CST IHC, and RT–PCR, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of Ventana IHC were 100% and 98%, respectively. Two Ventana IHC-positive cases, which were also CST IHC score of 3+, showed FISH negative, but their ALK rearrangement was confirmed by RT–PCR and direct sequencing. The sensitivity and specificity of CST IHC with staining intensity score of 1+ or more were 100% and 95%, respectively. Five (25%, of 20) patients with CST IHC score of 1+ were both FISH and RT–PCR negative. The sensitivity and specificity of RT–PCR for detection of ALK fusion were 98% and 95%, respectively. The total accordance rate between ALK RT–PCR and Ventana IHC was 97%. The novel fully automated IHC assay is a reliable screening tool in routine pathologic laboratories for identification of patients with ALK rearrangement for targeted therapy in lung ADC.

Variable genomic breakpoints have been identified through the application of target-capture DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) for ALK, ROS1, and RET fusion detection in NSCLC. We investigated whether ALK, ROS1, and RET genomic breakpoint location can predict matched targeted therapy efficacy. NSCLCs were analyzed by DNA NGS, target-specific RNA NGS, whole-transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry. In total, 3787 NSCLC samples were analyzed. DNA NGS detected ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions in 241, 59, and 76 cases, respectively. These fusions were divided into canonical (single EML4-ALK, CD74/EZR/TPM3/SDC4-ROS1, and KIF5B/CCDC6-RET fusions), noncanonical (single non-EML4-ALK, non-CD74/EZR/TPM3/SDC4-ROS1, and non-KIF5B/CCDC6-RET fusions), and primary/reciprocal (both primary and reciprocal rearrangements were detected) subtypes on the basis of genomic breakpoint position, and noncanonical and primary/reciprocal subtypes were defined as uncommon fusions. Further RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry revealed that six of 47 (12.8%) uncommon fusions were actually nonproductive rearrangements that generated no aberrant transcripts or proteins. Moreover, genomic breakpoints of canonical ALK and RET, but not ROS1, fusions always predicted breakpoints at the transcript level, whereas 85.4% (35 of 41) of uncommon fusions actually produced canonical fusion transcripts. Patients with uncommon ALK fusion (n = 31) who received first-line crizotinib exhibited shorter median progression-free survival than those with canonical ALK fusion (n = 53, 8.4 mo versus 12.0 mo, p = 0.004). However, no difference in progression-free survival was observed when only ALK RNA or protein-positive cases were analyzed (p = 0.185). Uncommon ALK, ROS1, and RET genomic breakpoint is an unreliable predictor of matched targeted therapy efficacy. Functional validation by RNA or protein assay may add value for the accurate detection and interpretation of rare fusions.