Cadmium (Cd), a heavy metal with strong carcinogenic properties has been linked with breast cancer risk. Epidemiological data on the association between Cd exposure and breast cancer are not consistent and suggest that this relationship may be modulated by a number of different factors. The mechanisms of action underlying the molecular effects of Cd, especially in terms of its carcinogenicity, are generally not well understood. Specifically, in the mammary gland, the effects of Cd are considered to be related mainly to its oestrogenic potential, however, several other mechanisms have also been suggested, such as epigenetic alterations, inhibition of DNA repair pathways, induction of oxidative stress, interference with metallothioneins, cadherins and integrins, as well as interactions with xenobiotics. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge in this field, including potential mechanisms of action of Cd in breast cancer initiation and progression, as well as possible ways of protection against its toxicity. Importantly, there are many research gaps in this area since limited evidence is available from experimental studies. Important issues to be further investigated concern exact molecular mechanisms of Cd accumulation in the tissues and Cd-induced activation of eostrogen receptors. Impact on DNA damage and epigenome upon Cd exposure in breast cancer development remains still highly unexplored area and should gain more interest.

Breast cancer has a multifactorial etiology. One of the supposed and novel mechanisms is an alteration of circadian gene expression. Circadian genes play a crucial role in many physiological processes. These processes, such as genomic stability, DNA repair mechanism and apoptosis, are frequently disrupted in breast tumors. To assess the significance of circadian gene expression in breast cancer, we carried out an analysis of CLOCK, BMAL1, NPAS2, PER1, PER2, PER3 and CRY1, CRY2, TIMELESS, CSNK1E expression by the use of the quantitative Real-Time PCR technique in tumor tissue and non-tumor adjacent normal tissue sampled from 107 women with a newly diagnosed disease. The obtained data were compared to the clinical and histopathological features. PER1, PER2, PER3, CRY2 were found to be significantly down-expressed, while CLOCK, TIMELESS were over-expressed in the studied tumor samples compared to the non-tumor samples. Only gene expression of CRY1 was significantly down-regulated with progression according to the TNM classification. We found significantly decreased expression of CRY2, PER1, PER2 genes in the ER/PR negative breast tumors compared to the ER/PR positive tumors. Additionally, expression of CRY2, NPAS2 genes had a decreased level in the poorly differentiated tumors in comparison with the well and moderately differentiated ones. Our results indicate that circadian gene expression is altered in breast cancer tissue, which confirms previous observations from various animal and in vitro studies.

Breast cancer (BC) is a major problem for civilization, manifested by continuously increasing morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Core circadian genes may play an important role in cancer development and progression. To evaluate the effects of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in circadian genes in BC risk, 16 functional SNPs were genotyped in 321 BC patients and 364 healthy women using the TaqMan fluorescence-labelled probes or High-Resolution Melt Curve technique in the Real-Time PCR system. The selected SNPs were analyzed for the risk of BC, progression, and the influence on gene expression in BC tissue pairs to demonstrate the functionality of genetic variants. The study showed a relationship between an increased BC risk under the dominant genetic model of CRY2 rs10838524, PER2 rs934945, and recessive genetic model of PER1 rs2735611. A protective effect of BMAL1 rs2279287 was observed among carriers with at least one variant allele. Moreover, we found an increased risk of estrogen-/progesterone-positive tumors under the dominant genetic model of PER2 rs934945 and estrogen negative tumors under the variant genotype of CRY2 rs10838524, PER1 rs2735611. We demonstrated significantly altered gene expression of BMAL1, CRY2, PER1, PER2, PER3 according to particular genotypes in the BC tissue pairs. Our findings support the hypothesized role of circadian genes in breast carcinogenesis and indicate probable biomarkers for breast cancer susceptibility.

A significant challenge in psychiatry is the differential diagnosis of depressive episodes in the course of mood disorders. Gene expression profiling may provide an opportunity for such distinguish...

One of the supposed mechanisms that may lead to breast cancer (BC) is an alteration of circadian gene expression and DNA methylation. We undertook an integrated approach to identify methylation pattern of core circadian promoter regions in BC patients with regard to clinical features. We performed a quantitative methylation-specific real-time PCR analysis of a promoter methylation profile in 107 breast tumor and matched non-tumor tissues. A panel of circadian genes CLOCK, BMAL1, PERIOD (PER1, 2, 3), CRYPTOCHROME (CRY1, 2) and TIMELESS as well as their association with clinicopathological characteristics were included in the analysis. Three out of the eight analyzed genes exhibited marked hypermethylation (PER1, 2, 3), whereas CLOCK, BMAL1, CRY2 showed significantly lower promoter CpG methylation in the BC tissues when compared to the non-tumor tissues. Among variously methylated genes we found an association between the elevated methylation level of PERs promoter region and molecular subtypes, histological subtypes and tumor grading of BC. Methylation status may be associated with a gene expression level of circadian genes in BC patients. An aberrant methylation pattern in circadian genes in BC may provide information that could be used as novel biomarkers in clinics and molecular epidemiology as well as play an important role in BC etiology.