For patients with locally advanced and unresectable pancreatic cancer (PDAC), neodadjuvant treatment and consecutive surgical exploration have been studied during the last decade with various neoadjuvant therapies including chemotherapy and combinations with radiation. Aim of the study was the evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy with a focus on Folfirinox. All consecutive patients undergoing surgery for PDAC after neoadjuvant treatment were analyzed (clinico-pathological characteristics, secondary resection rates, outcome). Patients receiving Folfirinox were compared with other treatment regimens. Between December 2001 and June 2015, 575 patients received neoadjuvant treatment and were scheduled for resection after re-staging. A successful resection was achieved in 292 patients (50.8%). Resection rates following Folfirinox were 61% (76/125 patients) compared with 46% (150/322 patients) after gemcitabine and radiation, and 52% (66/128 patients) after other treatments (P = 0.026). Median overall survival was 15.3 months after resection vs 8.5 months after exploration alone (P < 0.0001). Subgroup median survival was 16.0 months (Folfirinox) vs 16.5 months (gemcitabine) and 14.5 months (others) with 3-year survival of 28.1%, 23.2%, and 19.7%, respectively (P = 0.8582). By multivariable analysis, Folfirinox was confirmed to be independently associated with a favorable prognosis. Folfirinox is a valuable treatment option in the neoadjuvant therapy of PDAC. From the present data, which represent the largest available study population to date, Folfirinox seems to be the most effective protocol resulting in a significantly better secondary resection rate and overall survival than other treatments. It should be considered in all patients fit for this regimen and consecutive surgical exploration.

Background: Surgery is the only therapy with potentially curative intention in pancreatic cancer. This analysis aimed to determine prognostic parameters in a patient cohort with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma with a special focus on the revised R1-definition. Methods: Between October 2001 and August 2009, data from 1071 consecutively resected patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were prospectively collected in an electronical database. Parameters tested for survival prediction in univariate analysis included patient, tumor, and resection characteristics as well as adjuvant therapy. The parameters with significant results were used for multivariate survival analysis. Identified parameters with positive or negative prognostic effect were used to define risk groups and to assess the effects on patient survival. Results: Age, ASA-score, CEA and CA19–9 levels, preoperative insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, T-, N-, M-, R-, G-tumor classification, advanced disease, and LNR were all significant in univariate analysis, whereas gender, NYHA score, BMI, insurance status, type of surgical procedure, and adjuvant therapy were not. In multivariate analysis, age ≥70 years, preoperative insulin-dependent diabetes, CA19–9 ≥400 U/mL, T4-, M1- or G3-status, and LNR > 0.2 were independent negative predictors, whereas Tis/T1/T2-status, G1-differentiation, and R0-status (revised definition) were independently associated with good prognosis. Using these risk factors, patients were stratified into 4 risk-groups with significantly different prognosis; 5-year survival varied between 0% and 54.5%. Risk stratification resulted in improved survival prognostication within the predominant AJCC IIA and AJCC IIB stages. Conclusions: A newly defined prognostic profiling including the revised R1-definition discriminates survival of patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma better than the AJCC staging system, and may be of particular relevance for patient-adjusted therapy in the heterogeneous group of AJCC stage II tumors.

To assess the relevance of resection margin status for survival outcome after resection and adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. The definitions for R0 and R1 margin status after resection for pancreatic cancer are controversial. The strict definition of R0 requiring a 1 mm tumor-free margin is not commonly accepted. Reported R0/R1 rates and associated survival are highly heterogeneous. A standardized protocol with rigorous assessment of circumferential margins and the R0 definition with a 1 mm free margin were introduced into clinical routine in 2005. From a prospective database, patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma between January 1, 2006 and December 12, 2012 were identified. The rates of R0 (≥1 mm margin), R1 (<1 mm clearance), and R1 (direct margin involvement) status and associated survival were assessed by uni- and multivariable analyses. Of 561 patients included, 112 patients (20.0%) had R0 and 449 patients (80.0%) had R1 resections, including 123 (21.9%) R1 (≤1 mm) and 326 (58.1%) R1 (direct) resections. A total of 438 (85.9%) received adjuvant therapy. With R0, R1 (<1 mm), and R1 (direct) status the median survival times and 5-year survival rates were 41.6, 27.5, and 23.4 months; and 37.7%, 30.1%, and 20.3%, respectively (P < 0.0001). By multivariable analysis, margin status was confirmed to be independently associated with survival. In the context of adjuvant therapy, the resection margin status remains an important independent determinant of postresection survival. R0/R1 resection rates and associated survival vary significantly with the definitions used. An international consensus is urgently needed to achieve comparability with respect to studies and protocols on patients with adjuvant therapy.