Background: Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy offers minor benefit to patients with mucosal melanoma (MM). Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the preferred approach in patients with advanced or metastatic cutaneous melanoma, the evidence of their clinical use for MM is still limited. This systematic review aims to summarize the efficacy and safety of ICIs in advanced or metastatic MM. Methods: We searched electronic databases, conference abstracts, clinical trial registers and reference lists for relevant studies. The primary outcomes included the overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), one-year PFS rate, and one-year OS rate. Results: This review identified 13 studies assessing anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy, 22 studies assessing anti-PD-1 monotherapy, two studies assessing anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 combination therapy, one study assessing anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with axitinib, and three studies assessing anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with radiotherapy. For most patients who received ipilimumab monotherapy, the ORR ranged from 0% to 17%, the median PFS was less than 5 months, and the median OS was less than 10 months. For patients who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy, most studies showed an ORR of more than 15% and a median OS of more than 11 months. The combined administration of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 agents showed benefits over single-agent therapy with an ORR of more than 33.3%. In a phase Ib trial of toripalimab in combination with axitinib, approximately half of patients had complete or partial responses. Three retrospective studies that investigated anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with radiotherapy showed an ORR of more than 50%, which was higher than each single modality treatment. Conclusions: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies alone and in combination with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies or other modalities, are promising treatment options for advanced or metastatic MM. However, high-level evidence is still needed to support the clinical application.

Background: Organ-specific response patterns reported in previous studies indicate different response toward immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with different metastatic sites. This study aims to compare the efficacy of ICIs with conventional therapy in NSCLC patients with bone, brain or liver metastases. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for studies comparing ICIs with conventional therapy in NSCLC patients with bone, brain or liver metastases. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among included studies was analyzed using the random effects model. Results: Eight studies consisting of 988 NSCLC patients were included, 259 with brain metastases and 729 with liver metastases. No available study with bone metastases information was identified. For patients with brain metastases, ICIs significantly improved their OS (HR, 0.57; P = 0.007). For patients with liver metastases, both OS (HR, 0.72; P = 0.006), and PFS (HR, 0.72; P = 0.004) improvements were observed in the ICI treatment arm. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on target of ICIs and treatment regimen. PD-1 inhibitors could benefit patients with liver or brain metastases on OS and PFS (brain metastases: OS, HR, 0.43; P < 0.001; liver metastases: PFS, HR, 0.52; P = 0.003; OS, HR, 0.66; P = 0.001), while PD-L1 inhibitors could not. Patients with brain metastases could only gain OS improvement from ICIs combined with chemotherapy (HR, 0.41; P = 0.001), but for patients with liver metastases, the benefit was detected using ICIs single agent (HR, 0.68; P = 0.012) or ICIs combined with chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF therapy (HR, 0.52; P = 0.005). Conclusion: ICIs could significantly improve OS in NSCLC patients with brain or liver metastases compared with conventional therapy. Patients with brain metastases could only gain OS benefit from ICIs combined with chemotherapy, while those with liver metastases obtained superior OS from ICIs single agent or ICIs combined with chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF therapy.

Although mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) has declined consistently in the United States, CVD remains a major public health burden for Black US residents.^1,2 Given that clinical trials provide the foundational evidence that helps shape guideline recommendations for physicians and support approval of new drugs by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), equitable representation of Black US residents in clinical trials is vitally important. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate the representation status of Black US residents in crucial clinical trials supporting FDA approval of cardiovascular drugs.

Digestive system neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are rare neoplasms originating from neuroendocrine cells with a poor prognosis and limited effective treatments. Programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockade has been used in the management of more than 10 solid tumors and has achieved promising clinical outcomes. PD-L1 expression, immune cell infiltration, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) are all verified biomarkers that can predict the response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Here, we investigated PD-L1 expression and immune cell infiltration density by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of tumor samples from 33 patients with digestive system NECs. Tumor and paratumor normal samples from 31 of these patients underwent whole-exome sequencing to evaluate TMB and the MSI-high (MSI-H) status. In total, 29.0% of digestive system NECs had positive PD-L1 expression according to the tumor proportion score (TPS). Infiltration of CD3⁺, CD8⁺, and CD68⁺ cells was observed in 69.7, 27.3, and 54.5% of patients, respectively. The TMB value for patients sequenced ranged from 0.57 to 11.75 mutations/Mb, with a median of 5.68 mutations/Mb. mSINGS, MSIsensor, and MSIseq were used to analyze the MSI status according to the sequencing data, and in our evaluation, no MSI-H status was detected. Our data might indicate a limited potential of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in digestive system NECs, although clinical trials are warranted.