Mika Aalto

Dr. Mika Aalto

LUT-University
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 March 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGArun Gyawali
Arun Gyawali
Mika AaltoMika Aalto
Mika Aalto
JPJussi Peuhkurinen
Jussi Peuhkurinen
MVMaria Villikka
Maria Villikka
Tapio RantaTapio Ranta
Tapio Ranta
Biomass stored in young forests has enormous potential for the reduction of fossil fuel consumption. However, to ensure long-term sustainability, the measurement accuracy of tree height is crucial for forest biomass and carbon stock monitoring, particularly in young forests. Precise height measurement using traditional field measurements is challenging and time consuming. Remote sensing (RS) methods can, however, replace traditional field-based forest inventory. In our study, we compare individual tree height estimation from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and Digital Aerial Photogrammetry (DAP) with field measurements. It should be noted, however, that there was a one-year temporal difference between the field measurement and LiDAR/DAP scanning. A total of 130 trees (32 Scots Pine, 29 Norway Spruce, 67 Silver Birch, and 2 Eurasian Aspen) were selected for height measurement in a young private forest in south-east Finland. Statistical correlation based on paired t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA, one way) was used to compare the tree height measured with the different methods. Comparative results between the remote sensing methods and field measurements showed that LiDAR measurements had a stronger correlation with the field measurements and higher accuracy for pine (R2 = 0.86, bias = 0.70, RMSE = 1.44) and birch (R2 = 0.81, bias = 0.86, RMSE = 1.56) than DAP, which had correlation values of (R2 = 0.71, bias = 0.82, RMSE = 2.13) for pine and (R2 = 0.69, bias = 1.19, RMSE = 2.08) for birch. The correlation of the two remote sensing methods with the field measurements was very similar for spruce: LiDAR (R2 = 0.83, bias = 0.30, RMSE = 1.17) and DAP (R2 = 0.83, bias = 0.44, RMSE = 1.26). Moreover, the correlation was highly significant, with minimum error and mean difference (R2 = 0.79–0.98, MD = 0.12–0.33, RMSD = 0.45–1.67) between LiDAR and DAP for all species. However, the paired t-test suggested that there is a significant difference (p < 0.05) in height observation between the field measurements and remote sensing for pine and birch. The test showed that LiDAR and DAP output are not significantly different for pine and spruce. Presumably, the time difference in field campaign between the methods was the reason for these significant results. Additionally, the ANOVA test indicated that the overall means of estimated height from LiDAR and DAP were not significantly different from field measurements in all species. We concluded that utilization of LiDAR and DAP for estimating individual tree height in young forests is possible with acceptable error and comparable accuracy to field measurement. Hence, forest inventory in young forests can be carried out using LiDAR or DAP for height estimation at the individual tree level as an alternative to traditional field measurement approaches.

4 March 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Raghu KCRaghu KC
Raghu KC
Mika AaltoMika Aalto
Mika Aalto
OKOlli-Jussi Korpinen
Olli-Jussi Korpinen
Tapio RantaTapio Ranta
Tapio Ranta
Svetlana ProskurinaSvetlana Proskurina
Svetlana Proskurina
Even though biomass is characterised as renewable energy, it produces anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, especially from biomass logistics. Lifecycle assessment (LCA) is used as a tool to quantify the GHG emissions from logistics but in the past the majority of LCAs have been steady-state and linear, when in reality, non-linear and temporal aspects (such as weather conditions, seasonal biomass demand, storage capacity, etc.) also have an important role to play. Thus, the objective of this paper was to optimise the environmental sustainability of forest biomass logistics (in terms of GHG emissions) by introducing the dynamic aspects of the supply chain and using the geographical information system (GIS) and agent-based modelling (ABM). The use of the GIS and ABM adds local conditions to the assessment in order to make the study more relevant. In this study, GIS was used to investigate biomass availability, biomass supply points and the road network around a large-scale combined heat and power plant in Naantali, Finland. Furthermore, the temporal aspects of the supply chain (e.g., seasonal biomass demand and storage capacity) were added using ABM to make the assessment dynamic. Based on the outcomes of the GIS and ABM, a gate-to-gate LCA of the forest biomass supply chain was conducted in order to calculate GHG emissions. In addition to the domestic biomass, we added imported biomass from Riga, Latvia to the fuel mixture in order to investigate the effect of sea transportation on overall GHG emissions. Finally, as a sensitivity check, we studied the real-time measurement of biomass quality and its potential impact on overall logistical GHG emissions. According to the results, biomass logistics incurred GHG emissions ranging from 2.72 to 3.46 kg CO2-eq per MWh, depending on the type of biomass and its origin. On the other hand, having 7% imported biomass in the fuel mixture resulted in a 13% increase in GHG emissions. Finally, the real-time monitoring of biomass quality helped save 2% of the GHG emissions from the overall supply chain. The incorporation of the GIS and ABM helped in assessing the environmental impacts of the forest biomass supply chain in local conditions, and the combined approach looks promising for developing LCAs that are inclusive of the temporal aspects of the supply chain for any specific location.

1 June 2019 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mika AaltoMika Aalto
Mika Aalto
Raghu KCRaghu KC
Raghu KC
OKOlli-Jussi Korpinen
Olli-Jussi Korpinen
KKKalle Karttunen
Kalle Karttunen
TRTapio Ranta
Tapio Ranta

12 January 2023 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OKOlli-Jussi Korpinen
Olli-Jussi Korpinen
Mika AaltoMika Aalto
Mika Aalto
Raghu KCRaghu KC
Raghu KC
Timo TokolaTimo Tokola
Timo Tokola
Tapio RantaTapio Ranta
Tapio Ranta
The supply logistics of energy biomasses generally involves a complex system of supply chains, which aim to achieve timely and cost-efficient feedstock deliveries to biomass demand points. The performance of supply chains is often examined in case studies where spatial data about biomass sources and transportation networks are deployed in varying resolutions and to different geographical extents. In this paper, we have reviewed 94 publications, in which spatial data were used in case studies that focused on analysing and optimising energy biomass supply chains. The reviewed publications were classified into 16 categories, according to the publication year, study methods and objectives, biomass types, supply system complexity and the spatial features of each study area. This review found that the use of geographical information systems in this context has increased in popularity in recent years, and that and the multiformity of the applied methods, study objectives and data sources have increased simultaneously. Another finding was that most of the studies that we reviewed focused on countries in which spatial biomass and transport network data of high quality were unrestrictedly available. Nevertheless, case studies, including spatial data from multiple countries, were represented marginally in the papers that we reviewed. In this paper we also argue that a standard way of reporting geographical contents in biomass case studies should be developed to improve the comprehension and reproducibility of the publications in this field of research.

22 May 2025 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGArun Gyawali
Arun Gyawali
Mika AaltoMika Aalto
Mika Aalto
Tapio RantaTapio Ranta
Tapio Ranta
The precise identification and classification of tree species in young forests during their early development stages are vital for forest management and silvicultural efforts that support their growth and renewal. However, achieving accurate geolocation and species classification through field-based surveys is often a labor-intensive and complicated task. Remote sensing technologies combined with machine learning techniques present an encouraging solution, offering a more efficient alternative to conventional field-based methods. This study aimed to detect and classify young forest tree species using remote sensing imagery and machine learning techniques. The study mainly involved two different objectives: first, tree species detection using the latest version of You Only Look Once (YOLOv12), and second, semantic segmentation (classification) using random forest, Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). To the best of our knowledge, this marks the first exploration utilizing YOLOv12 for tree species identification, along with the study that integrates digital aerial photogrammetry with Planet imagery to achieve semantic segmentation in young forests. The study used two remote sensing datasets: RGB imagery from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) ortho photography and RGB-NIR from PlanetScope. For YOLOv12-based tree species detection, only RGB from ortho photography was used, while semantic segmentation was performed with three sets of data: (1) Ortho RGB (3 bands), (2) Ortho RGB + canopy height model (CHM) + Planet RGB-NIR (8 bands), and (3) ortho RGB + CHM + Planet RGB-NIR + 12 vegetation indices (20 bands). With three models applied to these datasets, nine machine learning models were trained and tested using 57 images (1024 × 1024 pixels) and their corresponding mask tiles. The YOLOv12 model achieved 79% overall accuracy, with Scots pine performing best (precision: 97%, recall: 92%, mAP50: 97%, mAP75: 80%) and Norway spruce showing slightly lower accuracy (precision: 94%, recall: 82%, mAP50: 90%, mAP75: 71%). For semantic segmentation, the CatBoost model with 20 bands outperformed other models, achieving 85% accuracy, 80% Kappa, and 81% MCC, with CHM, EVI, NIRPlanet, GreenPlanet, NDGI, GNDVI, and NDVI being the most influential variables. These results indicate that a simple boosting model like CatBoost can outperform more complex CNNs for semantic segmentation in young forests.