RNA-guided nucleases (RGNs) based on the type II CRISPR-Cas9 system of Streptococcus pyogenes (Sp) have been widely used for genome editing in experimental models. However, the nontrivial level of off-target activity reported in several human cells may hamper clinical translation. RGN specificity depends on both the guide RNA (gRNA) and the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) recognized by the Cas9 protein. We hypothesized that more stringent PAM requirements reduce the occurrence of off-target mutagenesis. To test this postulation, we generated RGNs based on two Streptococcus thermophilus (St) Cas9 proteins, which recognize longer PAMs, and performed a side-by-side comparison of the three RGN systems targeted to matching sites in two endogenous human loci, PRKDC and CARD11. Our results demonstrate that in samples with comparable on-target cleavage activities, significantly lower off-target mutagenesis was detected using St-based RGNs as compared to the standard Sp-RGNs. Moreover, similarly to SpCas9, the StCas9 proteins accepted truncated gRNAs, suggesting that the specificities of St-based RGNs can be further improved. In conclusion, our results show that Cas9 proteins with longer or more restrictive PAM requirements provide a safe alternative to SpCas9-based RGNs and hence a valuable option for future human gene therapy applications.

DNA is the source of genetic information, and preserving its integrity is essential in order to sustain life. The genome is continuously threatened by different types of DNA lesions, such as abasic sites, mismatches, interstrand crosslinks, or single-stranded and double-stranded breaks. As a consequence, cells have evolved specialized DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms to sustain genome integrity. By orchestrating multilayer signaling cascades specific for the type of lesion that occurred, the DDR ensures that genetic information is preserved overtime. In the last decades, DNA repair mechanisms have been thoroughly investigated to untangle these complex networks of pathways and processes. As a result, key factors have been identified that control and coordinate DDR circuits in time and space. In the first part of this review, we describe the critical processes encompassing DNA damage sensing and resolution. In the second part, we illustrate the consequences of partial or complete failure of the DNA repair machinery. Lastly, we will report examples in which this knowledge has been instrumental to develop novel therapies based on genome editing technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas.

Clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) technology has revolutionized the field of gene therapy as it has enabled precise genome editing with unprecedented accuracy and efficiency, paving the way for clinical applications to treat otherwise incurable genetic disorders. Typically, precise genome editing requires the delivery of multiple components to the target cells that, depending on the editing platform used, may include messenger RNA (mRNA), protein complexes, and DNA fragments. For clinical purposes, these have to be efficiently delivered into transplantable cells, such as primary T lymphocytes or hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells that are typically sensitive to exogenous substances. This challenge has limited the broad applicability of precise gene therapy applications to those strategies for which efficient delivery methods are available. Electroporation-based methodologies have been generally applied for gene editing applications, but procedure-associated toxicity has represented a major burden. With the advent of novel and less disruptive methodologies to deliver genetic cargo to transplantable cells, it is now possible to safely and efficiently deliver multiple components for precise genome editing, thus expanding the applicability of these strategies. In this review, we describe the different delivery systems available for genome editing components, including viral and non-viral systems, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and recent clinical applications. Recent improvements to these delivery methods to achieve cell specificity represent a critical development that may enable in vivo targeting in the future and will certainly play a pivotal role in the gene therapy field.

Targeted modulation of gene expression represents a valuable approach to understand the mechanisms governing gene regulation. In a therapeutic context, it can be exploited to selectively modify the aberrant expression of a disease-causing gene or to provide the target cells with a new function. Here, we have established a novel platform for achieving precision epigenome editing using designer epigenome modifiers (DEMs). DEMs combine in a single molecule a DNA binding domain based on highly specific transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) and several effector domains capable of inducing DNA methylation and locally altering the chromatin structure to silence target gene expression. We designed DEMs to target two human genes, CCR5 and CXCR4, with the aim of epigenetically silencing their expression in primary human T lymphocytes. We observed robust and sustained target gene silencing associated with reduced chromatin accessibility, increased promoter methylation at the target sites and undetectable changes in global gene expression. Our results demonstrate that DEMs can be successfully used to silence target gene expression in primary human cells with remarkably high specificity, paving the way for the establishment of a potential new class of therapeutics.

Disruption of CCR5 or CXCR4, the main human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) co-receptors, has been shown to protect primary human CD4⁺ T cells from HIV-1 infection. Base editing can install targeted point mutations in cellular genomes, and can thus efficiently inactivate genes by introducing stop codons or eliminating start codons without double-stranded DNA break formation. Here, we applied base editors for individual and simultaneous disruption of both co-receptors in primary human CD4⁺ T cells. Using cytosine base editors we observed premature stop codon introduction in up to 89% of sequenced CCR5 or CXCR4 alleles. Using adenine base editors we eliminated the start codon in CCR5 in up to 95% of primary human CD4⁺ T cell and up to 88% of CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell target alleles. Genome-wide specificity analysis revealed low numbers of off-target mutations that were introduced by base editing, located predominantly in intergenic or intronic regions. We show that our editing strategies prevent transduction with CCR5-tropic and CXCR4-tropic viral vectors in up to 79% and 88% of human CD4⁺ T cells, respectively. The engineered T cells maintained functionality and overall our results demonstrate the effectiveness of base-editing strategies for efficient and specific ablation of HIV co-receptors in clinically relevant cell types.

CRISPR–Cas9 is a powerful genome-editing technology that can precisely target and cleave DNA to induce double-strand breaks (DSBs) at almost any genomic locus. While this versatility holds tremendous therapeutic potential, the predominant cellular pathway for DSB repair—non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ)—often introduces small insertions or deletions that disrupt the target site. In contrast, homology-directed repair (HDR) utilizes exogenous donor templates to enable precise gene modifications, including targeted insertions, deletions, and substitutions. However, HDR remains relatively inefficient compared to NHEJ, especially in postmitotic cells where cell cycle constraints further limit HDR. To address this challenge, numerous methodologies have been explored, ranging from inhibiting key NHEJ factors and optimizing donor templates to synchronizing cells in HDR-permissive phases and engineering HDR-enhancing fusion proteins. These strategies collectively aim to boost HDR efficiency and expand the clinical and research utility of CRISPR–Cas9. In this review, we discuss recent advances in manipulating the balance between NHEJ and HDR, examine the trade-offs and practical considerations of these approaches, and highlight promising directions for achieving high-fidelity genome editing in diverse cell types.